Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: September 2006

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Blog Index Of Articles So Far

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Blog Index Of Articles (Dec 05 - Sept 06):

Dadlani's Perversity:
- SuicideGirls.com & The Gothic Vaishnava
- Another Example Of Sanjay's Perversity
- Sanjay's Views On Teen Porn & Child Pornography
- Sanjay & Gomorrah: Dadlani's Jesus Sex Fetish
- Requests For Jesus, Biblical & Disney Pornography
- What Kishore Dadlani Really Thinks Of Women
- Sanjay Kishore Dadlani's StreetBitches Blog
- More Proof Sanjay Created The StreetBitches Blog

Dadlani's Psychological Problems:
- Sanjay Rejoiced When Sai Baba Temples Bombed
- Bitter And Poison
- Psychologically Unstable Hip Hop Boy
- Sanjay: Multiple Personalities?
- Sanjay Dadlani's Serious Drinking Problems
- Proof Sanjay Dadlani Is Mentally Disturbed
- Bad Pudgy Finger Day

Sanjay The Psychopath:
- Psychopathy, Psychopaths & Psychopathic Behavior

Dadlani's Hare Krishna Ties:
- The Hare Krishna Wannabee
- Sanjay Defending Sathya Sai Baba
- Lord Krishna's Inability To Protect His Devotees?
- Sathya Sai Baba, Lord Krishna & Terrorism
- Yajna For All Humanity
- Another Guru Or Fake Pic?

Dadlani's Character Problems:
- Sanjay's Holy War
- Sanjay's Purchase Of Drugs And Racist Comments

Dadlani's Satanic Inclinations:
- The Angel Of Death: Azra`iL
- Sanjay, 666, Incest, Satan, & Alleged Christian Sciptures
- Sanjay's Satanic Inclinations
- Sanjay And The Satanic Bible

Dadlani's Pathological Lies:
- Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lies
- More Lies: Trying to Keep Up
- Did Dr. Naresh Bhatia Molest Females?
- Is Tony O'Clery Bisexual/Homosexual And A Molestor?
- Was Glen Meloy A "Disturbed Person"?
- Arnold Schulman And The Alleged "Serpentine Lie"
- The Aghori Vimalananda Lie
- Kishore Dadlani - Vicious Slanderer Extraordinaire
- Pious Pretenses
- Sanjay's Pseudo-Devotee Status
- The Meat Eating Vegetarian

Amusing Stuff About Dadlani:
- Maybe This Will Help
- Dadlani likes merged images. Me too
- Studmuffin Sanjay
- Practical Tips For Sanjay
- Dying But Still Not Dead
- A Seminal Discussion On Ojas, Urdhvaretas And Kishore Dadlani
- Sanjay's Love Life Trumps London Attacks
- Swaaaami!!! La la la la laaaaa!!

Dadlani's Homoeroticism:
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion
- Move Over He-Man - Here Comes He-Krsna!
- Pink Blog Theme
- Dream About Sanjay

Defamatory Attacks:
- Gerald 'Joe' Moreno: A Response
- Newest Defamation Campaign

Sanjay Dadlani & Robert Priddy:
- Robert Priddy Bashes Sanjays Guru And Beliefs
- Robert Priddy: The Pseudo-Moralist
- Blog Exposing Robert Priddy

Miscellaneous:
- Fake Miracle Pictures Of Sathya Sai Baba
- Sanjay Dadlani Criminal & Drunk At Large
- Occurrences of the number 108 - 1008
- Tapati And Her Sanjay-Repercussions
- International Sai Tribune Blog
- Feng Shui Buddha Mandalas
- Sanjay Dadlani and Brian Steel's Flip-Flopping
- Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit
- SaiBabaExposed Blog Failing Fast
- saibabaexposed Not Number One
- Sai Baba's Internet Ban UN-CONFIRMED!
- Sanjay's Mind Of A Prostitute

Friday, September 22, 2006

SuicideGirls.com & The Gothic Vaishnava

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

It is a well known fact that Sanjay has an aberrant sexual taste for the kinky, deviant, perverse and dark. This has already been evidenced by his Satanic Inclinations and his usage of the name Azra'il (Angel Of Death) (where he admitted using that name because he "felt that there was sufficient gloominess, torture and mysteriousness in his nature"). Therefore, it shouldn't be surprising that Sanjay is also into goth and even created a soulblood blog entitled "While My Heart Gently Weeps" and dedicated to "moody gothic fiction". The only post that Sanjay made on his gothic blog was the following:

Prologue
The moon shone brightly as she cut her own wrist with a disposable razor and held it to her mouth, shedding a solitary tear as she sipped the blood in anger.

Not only is this post very disturbing, it also reflects Sanjay's self-injurious comments where he fantasized about slicing his flesh with razors to release his "intense pain" and listened to Hard Metal music because the sound had "the special quality of slicing through your flesh and gliding straight into a pain-wracked soul". There is no doubt that Sanjay's "pain-wracked soul" is filled with bitterness and anger, all of which reflects his questionable mental condition.

In addition, Sanjay made the following posts his former killuminati blog about goth women. Sanjay said:

Fri, May 28, 2004: Title: "Back to Virgin":
I kinda like this girl. When she smiles, she looks like this evil gothic-type woman who could quite easily pass for a super-bitch. Oh man, that is such a turn-on. Plus she's a real friendly person. Haha, that's be something - a friendly latina goth. Suddenly I had a vision of her dressed up in leather and that made me hard.

Sat, Oct 22, 2005: Title: "A Change of Direction?":
These days it almost seems like the place is Goth Paradise, and I must admit that I was on the lookout for some freaky goth bitches just to check out the scene and all. At the very least I could take a look around a place that I have never checked out much.

As if this is not disturbing enough, Sanjay links his gothic blog directly to the SuicideGirls.com website (link provided for referencing purposes only). The SuicideGirls.com website is a soft-porn website with pin-up girls who bare their breasts, vaginas, nude bodies, tattooes, psychedelic hair and body piercings for the world to see. The site became so controversial, that some of the more graphic images involving blood, death and bondage were removed from the site. SuicideGirls.com was even targeted by the FBI. The site also provides a forum for people to discuss their perverse sexual fantasies. Click Here For A Entirely Random Example. Needless to say, all this fits in well with Sanjay's deviant Boot Sex Fetish and Jesus, Biblical & Disney Sex Fetishes.

More Information About SuicideGirls.com:

SuicideGirls On Wired.com
SuicideGirls On Wikipedia
Interview With SuicideGirls Founder
Suicide Girls Remove Images Of Bondage, Death and Blood

Of course, all this leaves one wondering why a self-professed devotee of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and Lord Krishna is fascinated with gothic culture and enjoys linking to and viewing a porn site to get cheap, dirty thrills? One must remember that Sanjay is the same person who airs his holier-than-thou rantings on his Gaurasundara Blog (where he posts numerous images of deities from the Hare Krishna Bhaktivedanta Temple, preaches about Gaudiya Vaishnavism, shrieks like a devotee, bows like a devotee and pretends to be a devotee)!

Hare Krishna!

P.S.
I am still waiting for Robert Priddy to complain about Sanjay's filth and slime.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lies

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Regarding Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album, he said:

Hahahaha, I LOVE the last picture. So having a folder entitled 'Jesus' in my personal YahooPhotos area means that I have a Jesus porn fetish? And, there's a very good chance that there might be porn pics of Jesus in that folder? ROFL! Sorry Joe, you just proved the definition of 'Morono'. :-) I just love the way you add 2 + 2 and come up with 22. :-)) (Reference)

First and foremost, I never claimed or said anything about Dadlani having "porn pics of Jesus in that folder". Why would I say that when all of the pics in that folder were visible in the screen-capture I took? The point I made, obviously, is that it appears that Dadlani has some sort of unhealthy obsession with Jesus. Therefore, the only person adding "2 + 2 and coming up with 22" is Dadlani. Secondly, Dadlani is referring to me as "Morono" (which means "pig" in Spanish). Judging from Dadlani's pictures, I am at least 50lbs - 70lbs lighter than him. So I find it amusing he is calling me "morono" when he is far porkier than I!

In this same post, Dadlani said:

And by the way it's not deleted, it's still there. Don't blame me if Yahoo decide to modify their policies and make Photo folders available to the public only if the Yahoo user has paid for premium access. But you wouldn#t care about that do you? You would just like to give people the impression that I "deleted" the folder because I had "something to hide", LOL. Your "research" is beyond hope now.

This statement proves that Dadlani checked his Yahoo Photo Album sometime prior to Monday Oct 24th, 2005 (the date he posted the message). How else would he know that his Yahoo Photo Album was "still there"? Dadlani also gave a reason why his Yahoo Photo Album was not visible, i.e., "Yahoo decide to modify their policies and make Photo folders available to the public only if the Yahoo user has paid for premium access". Consequently, Dadlani admitted he checked his photo album and admitted it was not visible to other people because of a modification in Yahoo's policy.

Click Here to view my response to Dadlani's post. As trusting as I am, I actually removed my comment about Sanjay deleting his photo album. However (to be on the safe side) I decided to take Dadlani's advice and "research" his claim for myself. I created my own Yahoo Photo Album. Even though I have never paid for "Premium Access" on Yahoo (nor did the friend I sent the link to), my Photo Album is fully accessible to the general public (See For Yourself). Consequently, Dadlani lied. About 10 minutes after posting this on the SSB2 Yahoo Board (which is e-mailed to those who request it), Dadlani reactivated his Photo Album!

Click Here to view Dadlani's subsequent response (made on Tuesday Oct 25th, 2005) where he said:

Joe, earlier today I logged into my killuminati address to check out YOUR claims that my photo folder was not available. I discovered that this was not true as I viewed my album BEFORE and AFTER logging in, and I was able to see my photo folders. I also checked the availability settings and they were set at PUBLIC, which shows that you ORIGINALLY LIED when yous aid the folder was not available. So please, I just checked it out. If you claim that my album has 'suddenly' become available, this has nothing to do with me as I just checked the accoutn a little over an hour ago. Stop lying.

Needless to say, Dadlani changed his story (again). This time around, Dadlani said that he "just checked" his photo folder (when one day earlier he clearly implied he already checked it) and found that, all along, the settings on his Photo Album were set on "public". Of course, this fails to explain why Dadlani said his Photo Album was not visible because of Yahoo's "premium access" policy change. To further my argument, I made a screen-capture to Dadlani's Photo Album when it was offline. I will leave it to the reader to assess all of this information for him/her self.

Below: After publishing my original article (exposing Dadlani's requests for kinky Jesus porn, in which I provided a screen-capture to his photo-folder entitled "Jesus"), his entire photo album went offline and the following screen-capture said why:

Below: After I published my response exposing Dadlani's bold-faced untruth about Yahoo's "premium service" claim, Dadlani put his photo album back up and claimed it was never taken down. Gee, I guess you don't need "premium service" afterall:

Below: After leaving his photo album up for a couple of days, Dadlani disabled access to his Photo Albums (Today: October 27th 2005):

Below: Sanjay's "Jesus" photo album:

Update: November 8th 2005: Just recently, I came across one of Dadlani's blogs, entitled "killuminati", and found very disturbing posts where Dadlani claimed that his "Jesus look" was getting him more sex with women! He even thanked Jesus for bringing him more sex with his "look". Read the full story about Sanjay's Jesus Sex Fetish here.

In Conclusion...
In conclusion, Dadlani doesn't want us to know the truth about him because he's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtains of prevarication and perversity and you'll see a blinkered smart aleck hiding behind them, strenuously pulling the levers of rhetoric and loquacity, all the while beating drums and blowing horns and whistles, trying to distract from the main issue; which happens to be about him and his alleged "integrity".

In this story, however, it isn't the Tin Man who doesn't have a heart or the Lion who doesn't have courage or the Strawman who doesn't have a brain, it's Sanjay Kishore Dadlani. After exposing "the man behind the curtain", Dadlani still lives in denial and still tries to feed the notion that he is someone who he isn't. Everyone can see this but himself. Stuck in his perpetual victim and blame mentality, Dadlani miserably struggles to defend his reprehensible behavior. The sad fact of the matter is that there is no defense.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Maybe This Will Help

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Maybe Sanjay will understand this better?

What do you want to bet Sanjay is going to throw one of his flaming, girly hissy-fits and dutifully play the victim?

Sanjay Throwing His Girly Hissy-Fits

lol

Sanjay Rejoiced When Sai Baba Temples Bombed

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

This entry is an update to my former articles: Sanjay Defending Sathya Sai Baba & Lord Krishna's Inability To Protect His Devotees?

On the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group Sanjay said:

And damn right, I am so happy that SB temples are being bombed. This is SB's own karma coming back to him. What a great God he is, he couldn't even protect his own temple, what a magnificent avatar. I wonder if anyone actually died in the blast (Reference).

Sanjay Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again

Regarding the bombing at the ISKCON temple, let me repeat my former argument (using Sanjay's words) with a slight modification: What a great God Lord Krishna is: He couldn't even protect his own temple and devotees on his birthday celebrations. What a magnificent avatar!

Sanjay himself argued that an avatar's inability to protect his temple reveals the said avatar's real power. Needless to say, Sanjay just made the perfect argument against his own chosen savior (Sri Krishna) that he made against Sathya Sai Baba.

Sanjay is making this way too easy for me.

Enough said!

Regarding The Bombing Near A Sai Baba Temple:
First and foremost, the bombing did not occur at a Sathya Sai Baba temple. It occurred near a famous Shirdi Sai Baba Temple in Dilsukhnagar (Reference).

Anti-Sai Activists have erroneously contended (as they often do) that the bombing occurred near a Sathya Sai Baba temple in Andhra Pradesh and made the following comments:

http://www.saiguru.net/english/news/021122birthday.htm
At the same time, Naxalites and Maoists continue a bombing campaign in Andhra Pradesh about which the world hears nothing. The Express Network reports on 22-11-02 : "One killed, 16 hurt in bomb temple blast" and "a bomb went off near the popular Sai Baba temple in the crowded Dilsukhnagar area" (see link 2 below). Could it be that not everyone loves SB, as he claims. Not even in his own State?

Fortunately, Gulam Yazdani, the man who committed this bombing (among other vicious attacks), was gunned down and stopped by the police (Reference).

Needless to say, Sanjay jumped onto the Anti-Sai bandwagon-of-deceit and rejoiced in the bombing, expressing his happiness, excitement and delight that a Sai temple was bombed and wondered if anyone was killed!

Sanjay is a sicko desperately in need of orthodox psychological help.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

More Lies: Trying to Keep Up

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

It's always a chore trying to keep up with Sanjay's pathological lies. On Sanjay's blog against me (morenojoe.blogspot.com) he infringed on my copyrights and duplicated content from my blogs onto his. When the same is done to Sanjay, he throws his typical girly hissy-fits and blathers about copyright infringement. Apparently, Sanjay can't practice what he preaches.

Lie #1:
Sanjay said:

January 9, 2006
Moreno's anal synonym

"Needless to say, when Pro-Sai Activists discuss the behavior and character of Anti-Sai Activists, they whine and accuse

others of resorting to ad hominem attacks! More double standards and deceit from the A.S.S. (Anti-Sathya-Sai) Team."

Boo-boo here.

Needless to say, I was not the person who created the befitting acronym "A.S.S. Team" (Anti-Sathya-Sai Team). It was an acronym mentioned on my guestbook by a person named Srinivas. Part of his submission reads:

Hi Joe. I have been going through the contents on your website and your ongoing arguments with Premanand. It's a great job you are doing. While you have highligted the contradictions that the ASS teams have put out, I am going to list out a few, that perhaps escaped your attention. I am aware of these as I was a student at Swami's college (Reference).

So the only "boo-boo here" was on Sanjay's behalf. He obviously did not care to research the origin of the term "ASS Team" and jumped to his erroneous conclusions (as he often does) and blamed me. Don't expect Sanjay to retract his comments. He never corrects his lies but rather justifies them with endless half-baked excuses and rambling diatribes whose sole purpose is to confuse, confound and bore readers to near-catatonia.

Lie #2:
Sajay said:

September 14, 2006
An Example of Moreno's Homosexuality

Oh yeah, this comes from the guy who DENIES that he was sexually abused by Sai Baba when the latter rubbed oil on his "lower stomach" (you absolutely sure not the genitals?). Moreno claimed not to have any clue of what was going on, and he ALLOWED Sai Baba to molest him. That in itself speaks volumes. Can you just imagine what any normal person might do if a total stranger attempted to fondle their genitals or rub oil on their lower stomach?

I specifically addressed the issue of my oiling on July 3rd 2006 and said:

First and foremost, my genitals were never oiled by Sathya Sai Baba. At no time were my genitals ever exposed. As I described on my own Personal Website, Sathya Sai Baba put his hand up to my face, clearly made circular motions with his thumb on his forefingers and a wonderfully and profusely fragrant, green oil materialized. Sathya Sai Baba smeared this oil, in one motion of his hand, on my "lower stomach". That's all that occurred. When I wrote my account, on my personal website, I never foresaw that Anti-Sai Activists would use my story against me and claim that I was sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba. Therefore, when I wrote my interview experience, I did not give a detailed description about what I meant by my "lower stomach". As I have said before, Baba smeared the oil just below my navel/belly button, i.e., "lower stomach" (not to be confused with one's lower abdomen or pubic area). My pants were never pulled down and my genitals were never touched or exposed. Anti-Sai Activists have the audacity to continue their defamatory campaigns, claiming I was sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, despite my clarifications. This proves that Anti-Sai Activists are a group of perverts who fantasize about Sathya Sai Baba inappropriately touching people. There is no rationalizing with these deviantly and sexually-focused individuals who hypocritcally claim that they are devoted to the truth, justice and morality (Reference).

Despite my repeated clarifications about my oiling, Sanjay continues to lie (months after my clarification) and stated that I was molested by Sathya Sai Baba. Of course, Sanjay is a mentally disturbed person who also happens to be a pathological liar who similarly lied about Al Rahm (claiming that Al Rahm was oiled on his genitals when he was not)! Al Rahm said (several times) that he was oiled on his solar plexus and openly related his oiling experience at Sai Retreats, on video and even in a book (Reference)! Al Rahm's oiling experience was non-sexual, just like mine. At no time was Al Rahm's genitals exposed and at no time did Sathya Sai Baba touch him inappropriately (just as in the case of my experience).

Sanjay Can't Shut Up:
On the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group, Sanjay said:

I am going to sleep now because I am sick of all the mudflinging. That's all they can do because they have learnt it from the Pervert of Puttaparthi. They have proved me right once again that they have NOTHING to contribute here, so I am sticking to my signature and placing them all on my ignore list again. I will ignore the vast majority of their posts and reply only to those that REQUIRE a reply, not the usual deranged rubbish from any of them (Reference).

I also feel that, with the exception of Angel, the level of "discussion" on this board has become so cretinous and moronic that it achieves no positive purpose. Consequently I have decided that I will not be talking to Arsehole and his friends and will only be here to post my blogs as and when they are published, and MAY participate in any discussion that is generated as a result of said posting.

There is simply no use in talking to arseholes like Arsehole, Homosexual Lisa (who recently de facto admitted suffering from psychological problems) and Drunkard Simon, *somebody* has to make a change. I'm pleased to report that that 'somebody' will be me, and I will now take the high road and restrict myself to posting only news and views about Sathya Sai Baba as well as ancillary issues thereof. The nonsense ends here (Reference).

P.S. The comments of Gerald 'Joe' Moreno (vishvarupa108), Lisa De Witt (conscientiousobjector2000) and Simon Brace (sai2uk) to this post will go directly into my Trashcan. This is because these individuals have worked very hard for their places on my Ignore List. [See link for more info.]

There is no use in my answering their perverse criticisms since EVEN the repetitions and rehashings have been addressed before. Consequently they have publicly proved that they have NOTHING worthwhile to say.

After last night's utterly childish behaviour by Lisa De Witt and Simon Brace, I have decided to take the LONG OVERDUE decision of placing them on my Ignore List. I am simply NOT interested in anything they have to say since even the most recent "discussions" have publicly displayed their complete ignorance of the Sai Expose mechanics and the personality and philosophy of Sai Baba.

I shall, of course, continue to post my blogs here as well as indulge in discussion of the same with interested people. However, anything stated by Lisa De Witt and Simon Brace will go straight into my Trashcan. I have set up email filters that will block their mails. Out of sight, out of mind. And it's about time too.

Will they be able to respond to my posts? Sure they will, the grand difference is that I will not care for what they say and I am not interested either. They have EARNED their place in my Ignore List with blood, sweat and tears and I have finally granted their deep desires.

If they desperately seek my attention, they will have to contact me by other means. They are now PERSONA NON GRATA and will be treated as such (Reference).

Sanjay repeatedly fails in his vain attempts to ignore Lisa, Simon and me (apparently he can't enough of us). Sanjay also stalks me, has unhealthy fantasies about me being a homosexual (probably because of his homoeroticism and gender confusion) and obsessively makes his typical condescending, spiteful and bitter comments against me.

Even when Sanjay decided to take the "High Road", he still couldn't slither out of his gutter.

As I said many times before, there is no rationalizing with Sanjay. He is a whacko whose decrepit arguments are solicited and endorsed by Anti-Sai Activists.

Fake Miracle Pictures Of Sathya Sai Baba

Although there are numerous accounts of paranormal phenomena attributed to Sathya Sai Baba, there are also unscrupulous people who seek to introduce fraudulent, alleged phenomena into the Sai Movement, circulate it as "authentic" and then later rejoice in exposing the fraudulence they introduced. The following two examples have been introduced into the Sai Movement as "authentic" miracle pictures although they are not genuine.

The Fake "Sai Krishna" Miracle Picture:
Here is an alleged miracle picture of Krishna with Baba's face on it:

Connie Shaw asked Baba about this picture and Baba's response was related on saibaba.ws:

Connie showed Baba the recent photo making the rounds and asked if the so-called Krishna photo with Baba's face on it were legitimate, as it looked very suspicious to her and she suspected it was a computer rendering with a fraudulent story attached to the photo re its origin. Baba said, "This is artificial. It is (like a) painting." Connie asked, "You mean, as on the computer, Swami?" Baba replied, "Yes, I don't like artificial (things)." He tossed it down.Connie thanked Him for confirming it (Reference).

Therefore, Baba himself said this picture was a fake. This Sai Krishna picture was actually a composite picture of Baba and the Krishna picture below:

Sanjay dedicated no less than 3 blogged posts trying to argue that this "Sai Krishna" picture was a fake. Instead of making such a huge fuss, all Sanjay needed to do was quote Baba's comments that the picture was fake. Of course, Sanjay probably didn't know about Baba's comments because he conducts very poor research and never mentioned this fact.

The Fake "Sai In The Sky" Miracle Picture:
There is another "miracle picture" of Sathya Sai Baba allegedly appearing in the sky. As the story goes, an airplane was preparing for a landing in Venezuela when it ran into very serious trouble. The pilot announced that all was lost. A devotee prayed to Sathya Sai Baba and saw him appear in the sky among the clouds. The plane landed safely. The devotee, quickly took out her camera and snapped a picture of "Swami in the skies, among the clouds". This incident was allegedly reported in the "Venezuela Times" the next day in an article entitled "Indian Saint appears in mid air to save plane".

Well, for starters, there is no known "Venezuela Times" newspaper. Hari Sampath (an Anti-Sai Activist) gave his own speculative version of this incident. Hari Sampath said:

Like most landings, the pilot was expecting a bumpy touchdown, that is all. And like all Sai Baba devotees (if any of you have ever flown with Sai Baba devotees, you will know what I am saying), this particular devotee instantly started praying to Sai Baba. She had with her a copy of "Avatar" by Howard Murphet which she was reading and held the book close to her heart . As it was quite into early evening and slightly dark, she saw the reflection of the photo on the book cover on the glass window of the plane ( the picture she took is an exact replica of the photo on the cover of "Avatar", surrounded by clouds) . She was already in a panicky state of mind, and greatly excited, snapped what she thought she saw through the glass window, with her camera. The situation with the plane was ok, and they landed alright.

Below: The picture used on Howard Murphet's "Sai Baba Avatar" book. As one can see, the title covers most of the bottom half of the picture. The title clearly covers his thumb and part of his hand. Also, the picture, on the cover of this book, was hand painted. It is not the original picture.

Below: The "miracle picture" that was supposedly taken from an unnamed woman on an airplane that ran into serious trouble. After praying to SSB, the unnamed woman claimed she saw SSB in the clouds and took this picture through the window. One can see that the image is not taken from Howard Murphet's book (as the title is not seen on his thumb or SSB's clothes). This image is also the original picture. It was not hand painted, as was done on Howard Murphet's book. Hari Sampath, who knows what "really" happened, says that the image of Howard Murphet's book was reflected in the plane window and that is what the woman saw and took a picture of. This is simply untrue. If it were true, where is the title to the book that clearly covers SSB's thumb and clothing?

Below: How easy is it to create an image like the "miracle picture"? I merged an Om and another old picture of SSB into the "miracle picture" in less than 2 minutes. Anyone could have faked this miracle picture. Here is the result.

There are always antagonists who want to exploit devotee's faith by introducing fraudulent stories and pictures into the Sai Movement and then later rejoice in exposing these fraudulent stories and pictures. Luckily, many devotees and proponents have healthy skepticism and do not blindly believe such stories. I, for one, knew these two "miracle" pictures were actually altered with a computer before anyone ever publicly exposed them on the internet. As a matter of fact, I create these merged images myself. No miracles needed:

Saturday, September 16, 2006

Sanjay Dadlani Criminal & Drunk At Large

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay, obviously posting while being inebriated, made a post claiming that I am violating his copyrights and that I am a "criminal at large" even though he clearly has a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Licence on his blog! Needless to say, I fully attribute Sanjay's words to him, do not create derivative works nor is my blog for commercial purposes. Needless to say, Sanjay copied my blog posts, notably on his "Gerald Moreno: Tackling A Krishna Problem" blogged post, and saw absolutely nothing wrong with that!

More hypocrisy from the hypocrite extraordinaire!

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Another Example Of Sanjay's Perversity

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

This is the typical way Sanjay responds to others on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group, Sanjay said:

Get it into your THICK skull, drunkard. Moreno MISQUOTED me and a fool like you SWALLOWED it.

Just like you swallow everything in support of Sai Baba.

Even if Sai Baba asked you to perform oral sex on him, you would do it without a second thought and swallow his semen while you're at it. Your twelve years of studying Vedanta has not endowed you with a brain.

Get lost and get out. :-) (Reference)

Tell me Sanjay is not some sort of whacked out sexually-focused pervert.

Oh yeah, where is Robert Priddy with his holier-than-thou pseudo-morality complaining about Sanjay's sexually perverse language?

Sanjay Defending Sathya Sai Baba

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Regarding my former post about Lord Krishna's inability to protect his devotees, Sanjay (the Hare Krishna Wannabee) immediately frothed at the mouth, pulled out his hair and sprung into action defending his chosen savior with a rambling diatribe, replete with inherent contradictions, spiritual justifications and half-baked arguments that wholly and utterly compromise his critiques against Sathya Sai Baba as a perceived Avatar (incarnation of God).

Let me reiterate the basic premise made in my previous post: When it comes to violence, suffering, disease, famine, torture, terrorism, poverty, natural diasasters, violence, injustice, war and death, Anti-Sai Activists blame Sathya Sai Baba because he claims to be God (just as Sanjay did for Baba's alleged failure to warn his country of terrorist attacks and just a Robert Priddy did in regards to how devotees die). Needless to say, Anti-Sai Activsts do not believe Sathya Sai Baba is God. Consequently, violence, suffering, disease, famine, torture, terrorism, poverty, natural diasasters, violence, injustice, war and death are placed squarely on the shoulders of whomever Anti-Sai Activists do believe is the "real" God (i.e., Krishna, Shiva, Jesus, Allah, etc.).

I could go on, but why should I when Sanjay made a strong argument for me?

Sanjay argued that Lord Krishna, as God, allows all different types of miseries to occur because:

Vedanta philosophy does not blame God for calamities and catastrophes.

Devotees attain God at the time of their deaths, and thus the way they die is irrelevant in the greater spiritual schema.

Lord Krishna (as God) is detached and a neutral observer.

Natural disasters occur independent of God's will and as such, devotees and non-devotees alike are subjected to these entirely natural events that cause mass suffering and death.

Natural disasters are caused by personal and mass karma along with karmic repercussions.

Environmental catasrophes are the result of man's misuse of natural resources.

Sanjay said:

At first glance, Moreno's argument appears to have some merit but it is a person with only a cursory understanding of Hinduism/Vedanta who would attribute any such merit. Contrary to Moreno's strongly-held ideas, Vedanta philosophy does not agree with the premise of God being "blamed" for any calamity and catastrophe that occurs leaving alone the fact that much mainstream criticism of God for being "unconcerned" with world affairs and personal tragedies is unwarranted in the overwhelming majority of cases. To understand this further, let's take a look at Lord Krishna's words in India's best-loved scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita: "After attaining Me, the great souls, who are yogis in devotion, never return to this temporary world, which is full of miseries, because they have attained the highest perfection. From the highest planet in the material world down to the lowest, all are places of misery wherein repeated birth and death take place. But one who attains to My abode, O son of Kunti, never takes birth again." (8.15-16) Elsewhere: "O Dhananjaya [Arjuna], all this work cannot bind Me. I am ever detached, seated as though neutral." (9.9) Readers should please bear in mind that I am presenting these quotes in an extremely reductionist form and that the topic is certainly more complicated than to be restricted to just three verses, but it is possible to say that these three quoted verses represent the bare bones of the doctrine as a whole. Essentially speaking, the material world is intrinsically a place of misery and suffering whereby personal and environmental tragedies occur from time to time as a matter of course. It is in the nature of things to rise and fall, suffer upheaval and enjoy calm, and such happenings occur via the mechanisms of personal and mass karma too. Whereas God's involvement can be invoked, the general situation is that nature is like a self-actuating machine that functions according to it's intrinsic blueprint while God is seated detached and neutral. Personal tragedies are usually the result of man's inhumanity to (or interaction with) man, a favourite saying of Sai Baba's. Environmental catastrophes are almost always believed to be the result of man's misuse of natural resources. There is essentially a karmic repercussion behind every occurrence, good and bad. With all of these karmic connections interacting with each other on a personal, national and worldwide scale, this idea gains credence among spiritual aspirants as a workable method of understanding the problems of life.

So what does all this mean? Sanjay offers perfectly valid (spiritual) reasons why Sathya Sai Baba does not avert acts of terrorism, prevent natural disasters and why his devotees die just like everyone else! Thank you Sanjay.

Sanjay just made a strong spiritual argument for devotees and proponents of Sathya Sai Baba! For those who believe Sathya Sai Baba is God, the spiritual explanations that Sanjay just provided (to defend Lord Krishna with) are entirely applicable to Sathya Sai Baba who is perceived to be an Avatar and incarnation of Lord Krishna by his devotees. Therefore, Sanjay inadvertently vindicated Sathya Sai Baba by resorting to the very same spiritual explanations that devotees use to defend Sathya Sai Baba with on why he acts the way he does and why devotees die the way they do!

Once again, Sanjay flip-flops, belly-flops and sticks his big foot in his big mouth.

Update: September 14th 2006:
Since Sanjay whined about me not including the following paragraph, I will include it here. As far I am concerned, it is just more jibberish. Nevertheless, I will respond to it.

In the context of terrorist incidents, Sai Baba himself is noted for his frequent meetings with Indian politicians at the highest levels, occasionally meeting with the heads of state of other countries. After all, his devotees boast about these events often enough! In a deceptive bid to selectively quote me, Moreno attempted to do away with this prickly political clause in a misguided attempt to deride me and which backfired spectacularly. The point stands: "For this atrocity to happen ... casts doubt upon the ability of Sai Baba to warn and protect his own country from terrorism, despite his frequent meetings with Cabinet ministers and other government representatives.

Funny enough, Sanjay already solved this problem. Karma! lol Using Sanjay's spiritual explanations, Baba did not warn them because of their karma. Remember, there are "karmic repercussions" and "karmic connections" everywhere. lol

Put aside that debate that Baba is God. Lord Krishna cannot protect anyone anymore or any less than Sathya Sai Baba. Enough said :-)

Furthermore, Sri Krishna and Sri Balaram got personally involved in a failed diplomacy attempt that resulted in (if true) the bloodiest war in recorded history in which millions of men were said to have died in a matter of 18 days and rivers of blood flowed from the carnage! Needless to say, both Krishna and Balaram were directly involved with the diplomats of the day and could not avert the war. As a matter of fact, devotees of Lord Krishna (like Sanjay) actually try to justify the Kurukshetra war by resorting to the same "spiritual" mumbo-jumbo that Sanjay blithely ranted about.

For such an atrocity to happen casts valid doubts on Lord Krishna's ability to warn or protect his country despite his personal involvement with the diplomats of the day and despite the claims that Lord Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead from whom an atomic particle supports and sustains the entire Universe! Apparently, according to religious texts, God acts in mysterious ways that cannot be perceived by ordinary mortals. An excuse that devotees happen to use with Sathya Sai Baba, exactly as Sanjay does with his own beliefs.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Lord Krishna's Inability To Protect His Devotees?

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On August 21st 2006, no less than on Janmasthami Day itself (Lord Krishna's Birthday), a grenade was hurled into an Iskcon temple that ended up killing 5 people and injuring 40 others. Needless to say, among those who immediately condemned the vicious attack (displaying a rare sense of empathy for the Hare Krishna's who are generally antagonistic against Sathya Sai Baba) was the Sri Sathya Sai Seva Organisation of Assam, Manipur and North East States:

Other social organisations which have strongly condemned the incident include Kuki Mothers' Association, Manipur; Academy of Martial Arts and Cultural Organisation, Manipur; Ever Living Youth Sporting Agency, Thoubal Phouden; Old Cachar Road (Tongjei Maril) Chingmee-Tammee Development Committee, Bishnupur; Service Education for Welfare Action (SEWA), Manipur; Ima Keithel Auto Owners and Drivers' Union, Kongba Bazar; Loyalam Apunba Nupi Lup, Khumbong Bazar; Samurou Nupi Chaokhat Thoudang Lup, Imphal West; Oriental Leveller Association, WangkheiKongba; Sri Sathya Sai Seva Organisation (Assam, Manipur and North East States); Rural Service Agency, Palace Compound; Nilamani English School, Heingang United Clubs' Organisation; St Joseph's School, etc. (Reference).

Another news article:

Manipur Iskcon temple attacked, 4 dead
K Sarojkumar Sharma

IMPHAL: Janmashtami celebrations in Manipur turned bloody on Wednesday when a grenade was tossed into the Iskcon temple crowded with more than 20,000 devotees.

The blast left at least four devotees dead and 40 others injured, including Iskcon international director Damodara Swami, police said.

A woman and a child who came to the temple to offer Janmasthami prayers were among those killed. Four foreigners, two of them Americans and a Swiss national, were among the wounded, said additional SP (Imphal) Radheyshyam Singh.

He said the identity of one foreigner could not be immediately ascertained since all the injured had been rushed to different hospitals.

Police said suspected militants hurled a grenade at a mandap inside the temple when the classical Manipuri Raas Leela dance was being performed as part of Janmashtami celebrations. The grenade was hurled at the centre of the mandap where Damodara Swami was sitting.

Of those injured, the condition of at least four was critical. At least 10 children were hurt, most by shrapnel and splinters that tore through their arms and legs.

Organisers estimated about 20, 0000 devotees had gathered on Wednesday evening for Janmashtami, one of the biggest religious events in Manipur, where most Hindus were Krishna worshippers.

The Iskcon temple is one of the major shrines in Imphal valley which is predominantly inhabited by Vashnavite Manipuris. One of the top gurus of Iskcon movement, Damo-dara Swami, stays mostly in Imphal since he's a Manipuri. He was injured on his hands by splinters.

Security at Manipur's biggest shrine, the Sri Govindaji temple, was tightened following the Iskcon blast. Govindaji is another shrine where thousands of devotees gather on Janmasthami night (Reference).

Although this attack is horrifying, and should not be trivialized in any way, I can't help to wonder how Sanjay's arguments against Sathya Sai Baba come into play when applied to violent acts perpetuated against the Hare Krishna's?

For example, Sanjay discussed the terrorist blasts in Mumbai that killed 180 people and injured 660+ others. Sanjay said:

"For this atrocity to happen the day after the festival of Guru Poornima itself casts doubts upon the ability of Sai Baba to warn and protect his own country from terrorism..."

Putting aside the glaring fact that Lord Krishna (the "real" God, to Sanjay) was unable to warn or protect his country from the terrorist blasts in Mumbai, one can't help to notice how Sanjay flip-flops and ignores violence when directed towards the Hare Krishna's (of which he is a congregational member) and the implications thereof about his savior, Bhagavan Sri Krsna.

If Lord Krishna is really God (as Sanjay contends), then why did Sri Krishna allow others to die so horribly? Reflecting on Sanjay's words, in relation to the Iskcon attack (with a slight modification):

"For this atrocity to happen on Janmasthami Day itself, casts doubt upon Lord Krishna's ability to warn or protect his devotees or country from terrorism and attacks."

This is exactly the problem with Sanjay. His critiques are one-sided and highly selective. When wagging his tongue and frothing at the mouth, Sanjay fails to divulge the relevance of his critiques to his own belief system. No doubt, he does this in order to mislead others with his propaganda. Anti-Sai Activists do the same thing. They point out numerous world-wide atrocities and blame Sathya Sai Baba because he claims to be God. However, since Anti-Sai Activists do not consider Sathya Sai Baba to be God, all of their critiques and citations of atrocities fall flat at the door-step of their own chosen God concept!

If Lord Krishna could not protect his own devotees who gathered at a temple dedicated to him (no less than during his birthday celebrations), what hope does Sanjay have in being saved from his perversities, obscenities and absurdities? I think the chances are slim to none.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Sanjay's Mind Of A Prostitute

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Oh this is too funny!

Especially considering Sanjay's overemotional response to my dream about him in which he concluded that I was a homosexual simply because I dreamed about him. Using Sanjay's logic (illogic), what does his dream mean about wanting to have sex with a prostitute? That he is a prostitute? Sanjay said:

The Mind of a Prostitute
Last night I dreamt that I approached a prostitute with the intention of you-know-what. I wonder why. My dreams have taken on a sort of slapstick tone lately; for example, I might dream that I am cooking something and then all sorts of things and events happen within the dream that distract me far away from my purpose and by the end of it I haven't cooked anything. So in the same vein, I dreamt that I approached a prostitute to sleep with her but I never actually got to do the deed thanks to the circumstantial distractions that took place.

Even so, it was a strange dream and I wondered what had occurred to make me dream of such weird things. Recently I have been arguing the virtues of Krishna-worship (God-worship) versus demigod-worship. We all know of those Gita verses where demigod-worship is more or less banned, and also that quote in some Purana or other (Skanda?) that giving up Krishna to worship the demigods is like giving up your mother and living with a witch. Among demigod-worshippers it is usually the case that several demigods are worshipped as in the case of Adi Sankara and his panca-puja idea (worship of five different divinities). It is my own personal thing to term this as spiritual prostitution. I have also used this in the context of jumping from one guru to another, spiritual prostitution. So perhaps the usage of this term with all of it's mundane connotations went into my subconscious and accounted for my dream.

In any case I did realise when I woke up that I should not lend my mind to such ideas even if I do have good intentions like pointing out the irrelevance of demigod-worship. It is just not a good idea to think of things with such strong terms like "prostitution" even though I have been doing it for years.

And then all of a sudden it hit me in a eureka moment: the mind is like a prostitute, flitting from one thought to another in the same way as a prostitutes flits from man to man. After all, one of the side-aims of spiritual practice is to bring the mind under control so that it can be focused on God, who is incidentally the only Man (Purusha). Wow, even though I had to learn this lesson in a rather graphic way, it is still a heck of a lesson to learn!

nirantara sevā kare antarmanā hañā

"At all times, perform service in the mind."
(CC 2.22.159)

In other words, try to think of Krishna constantly, keeping material thoughts to a minimum. Wise words indeed (Reference).

Sanjay's mind IS like a prostitute. A slutty, kinky, sleazy, deviant and slimy one at that!

Keep trying to think of Lord Krsna, Sanjay. Sanjay obviously cannot think of Lord Krishna as evidence by the public exposure of his StreetBitches Blog, his Jesus Sex Fetish, his views on Child And Teen Pornography, his self-admitted Psychological Problems, his Disturbing Views About Women, his self-admitted Drinking Problems, his Satanic Inclinations, his Shocking Confessions, his Long And Established History As A Pathological Liar, his outward Denial Of His Own Hare Krishna Guru - Srila Prabhupada, his public Lie About Meeting Aghori Vimalananda, his Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion, his Inability To Keep A Girlfriend, his Pseudo-Devotee Posturing, his He-Man Inspired God Concept, his Lies About Being A Vegetarian, his weird claim that He Was Dying, his amusing Belief That Semen Can Be Sucked Up From The Testicles, Via The Spine, To The Brain and his Suicidal And Self-Injurious Statements.

Poor Sanjay. Can hear him crying his eyes out right now

Monday, September 04, 2006

Sanjay's Holy War

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay is an extremist who believes that he is waging a literal holy war against Sathya Sai Baba for his personal savior, Lord Krishna. On Sanjay's saiexposed420 Yahoo profile, his favorite quote is listed as:

Mam anusmara yudhya cha - Remember me and fight. -- Bhagavad-gita 8.7 (Reference).

This quote is directly in reference to the Kurukshetra War (if true, the bloodiest war in recorded history), in which alleged millions of men died in a matter of 18 days and rivers of blood flowed from the carnage because Lord Krishna (God Incarnate) failed in his attempt at diplomacy. Sanjay, putting himself in the place of Arjuna, imagines Lord Krishna talking to him and telling him to "Remember me and fight". And fight Sanjay does (in his characteristic shrieking, girly, whiny and frothing-at-the-mouth ways).

Not only does Sanjay desperately fight against Sathya Sai Baba and his devotees and proponents, he also attempts to justify his deviant, kinky, lustly sexual escapades, anger and hate by citing the words of Thakura Mahasaya (a Vaishnava Acarya). Sanjay posted the following verses on the Gaudiya-Repercussions site:

kAma krodha lobha moha, mada mAtsarjya dambha saha,
sthAne sthAne niyukta koribo.
Ananda kori hRdoy, ripu kori parAjoy,
anAyAse govinda bhajibo. (21)

Translation: I will engage lust, anger, greed, illusion, envy and pride all in their proper places. Thus I can defeat these enemies with a blissful heart and easily worship Govinda.

Sanjay's Words: "ThAkura MahAzaya further explains how such things may be used fruitfully in the pursuit of devotion":

kRSNa sevA kAmArpaNa, krodha bhakta-dveSI jane,
lobha sAdhu-saGge hari-kathA.
moha iSTa lAbha vine, mada kRSNa guNa gAne,
niyukta koribo yathA tathA. (22)

I offer my lust to the service of KRSNa, my anger towards the enemies of His devotees and my greed towards association with saints and topics of Lord Hari. I am deluded without my beloved Lord, and I am proud when I sing KRSNa's glories. Thus I engage all them in KRSNa's service!

Apparently, Sanjay is utilizing all of his lust, anger, greed, illusion and pride in order to "fruitfully" pursue his devotion to Lord Krishna! Sanjay utilizes his anger, hatred, lies, deceit, defamation-tactics and frothing-at-the-mouth rhetoric against Sathya Sai Baba because he thinks he is waging a holy war (serving Lord Krishna) and will thereby increase his devotion and purify himself! In Sanjay's belief system, he can conveniently justify his vile and venom.

Of course, all of this sounds eerily similar to the religious extremists who believe they are fighting for God and thereby are entitled to express their anger and hatred in any way they choose.

Sanjay Dadlani Exposed