Sathya Sai Baba, Lord Krishna & Terrorism
Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK
Sanjay recently blogged about terrorist blasts in Mumbai (that killed 180 people with as many as 660+ injured) and stated that Sathya Sai Baba did not give a warning to "protect his own country from terrorism, despite his frequent meetings with Cabinet ministers and other government representatives".
What is amusing about Sanjay's comments is that he is a Hare Krishna Wannabee.
It is alleged that the Kurukshetra War (a war that if true would be the bloodiest war in recorded history) arose from a dispute between the Kauravas and the Pandavas after which the Karuavas won a game of dice through deceit, thereby exiling the Pandavas for 13 years. After the Pandava's exiled term expired, Duryodhana (the eldest Kaurava) refused to concede the throne back to the Pandavas.
The Pandavas were personally advised by Balarama (whom, according to the Hare Krishna's, is the first plenary expansion of the Supreme Personality of Godhead).
Lord Krishna himself (whom, according to the Hare Krishna's, is the Supreme Personality of Godhead out of which innumerable universes emanate) went on a peace mission to convince the Kauravas to accept peace and avert a war. Needless to say, Lord Krishna failed, the war was not averted and it is said that literally millions of men died within a period of 18 days (leaving innumerable wives widowed and children orphaned).
Isn't it strange that Sanjay Dadlani (a Hare Krishna Wannabee) is whining about a terrorist blast in India and Sathya Sai Baba's inability to give a warning to protect his own country when Lord Krishna personally got involved to protect his own country, failed and whose failure resulted in one of the bloodiest wars ever recorded in human history (in which literally millions of men perished in a matter of 18 days)?
Of course, Sanjay will resort to brainwashed babble to defend his beliefs and why Lord Krishna failed to avert the Kurukshetra War. One can similarly argue that whatever excuses Sanjay uses with Lord Krishna, Sathya Sai Baba's devotees will use with Sathya Sai Baba.
Of course this is only one example out of many.
During the life of Lord Krishna, there were allegedly numerous instances of violence, curses, demon-attacks, etc. that resulted in the deaths of many people, children and even babies (as in the case of Kamsa where he bludgeoned babies in anticipation of Lord Krishna's birth). The Yadava Clan succumbed to a curse and slaughtered themselves in an orgy of bloodlust. Lord Krishna cursed his 16,000 wives to be carried off by barbarians after his death (which happened before Arjuna's eyes). Sanjay accepts all these horrific stories and atrocities without doubt or question and even defends these stories.
Far be it for Sanjay to point his pudgy fingers at Sathya Sai Baba when his own personal God (Lord Krishna) arguably suffered from far greater deficiencies in far greater ways. Of course, Sanjay will probably point out that my criticism of Lord Krishna is peculiar, considering that Sathya Sai Baba is alleged to be an incarnation of Lord Krishna (in which case, Sathya Sai Baba's alleged failures could be justified using the very same spiritual explanations used to defend Lord Krishna).
The point is that Sanjay does not consider Sathya Sai Baba to be an incarnation of Lord Krishna yet metes out one-way and selective criticisms, ignoring his own belief system. Sathya Sai Baba's alleged failures pale in comparison to Lord Krishna's failures. There is no arguing with a failed peace effort that resulted in the deaths of millions of men (in a mere 18 day period) in which rivers of blood flowed from the carnage!
The hypocrisy never ends from Sanjay Dadlani.
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK
Sanjay recently blogged about terrorist blasts in Mumbai (that killed 180 people with as many as 660+ injured) and stated that Sathya Sai Baba did not give a warning to "protect his own country from terrorism, despite his frequent meetings with Cabinet ministers and other government representatives".
What is amusing about Sanjay's comments is that he is a Hare Krishna Wannabee.
It is alleged that the Kurukshetra War (a war that if true would be the bloodiest war in recorded history) arose from a dispute between the Kauravas and the Pandavas after which the Karuavas won a game of dice through deceit, thereby exiling the Pandavas for 13 years. After the Pandava's exiled term expired, Duryodhana (the eldest Kaurava) refused to concede the throne back to the Pandavas.
The Pandavas were personally advised by Balarama (whom, according to the Hare Krishna's, is the first plenary expansion of the Supreme Personality of Godhead).
Lord Krishna himself (whom, according to the Hare Krishna's, is the Supreme Personality of Godhead out of which innumerable universes emanate) went on a peace mission to convince the Kauravas to accept peace and avert a war. Needless to say, Lord Krishna failed, the war was not averted and it is said that literally millions of men died within a period of 18 days (leaving innumerable wives widowed and children orphaned).
Isn't it strange that Sanjay Dadlani (a Hare Krishna Wannabee) is whining about a terrorist blast in India and Sathya Sai Baba's inability to give a warning to protect his own country when Lord Krishna personally got involved to protect his own country, failed and whose failure resulted in one of the bloodiest wars ever recorded in human history (in which literally millions of men perished in a matter of 18 days)?
Of course, Sanjay will resort to brainwashed babble to defend his beliefs and why Lord Krishna failed to avert the Kurukshetra War. One can similarly argue that whatever excuses Sanjay uses with Lord Krishna, Sathya Sai Baba's devotees will use with Sathya Sai Baba.
Of course this is only one example out of many.
During the life of Lord Krishna, there were allegedly numerous instances of violence, curses, demon-attacks, etc. that resulted in the deaths of many people, children and even babies (as in the case of Kamsa where he bludgeoned babies in anticipation of Lord Krishna's birth). The Yadava Clan succumbed to a curse and slaughtered themselves in an orgy of bloodlust. Lord Krishna cursed his 16,000 wives to be carried off by barbarians after his death (which happened before Arjuna's eyes). Sanjay accepts all these horrific stories and atrocities without doubt or question and even defends these stories.
Far be it for Sanjay to point his pudgy fingers at Sathya Sai Baba when his own personal God (Lord Krishna) arguably suffered from far greater deficiencies in far greater ways. Of course, Sanjay will probably point out that my criticism of Lord Krishna is peculiar, considering that Sathya Sai Baba is alleged to be an incarnation of Lord Krishna (in which case, Sathya Sai Baba's alleged failures could be justified using the very same spiritual explanations used to defend Lord Krishna).
The point is that Sanjay does not consider Sathya Sai Baba to be an incarnation of Lord Krishna yet metes out one-way and selective criticisms, ignoring his own belief system. Sathya Sai Baba's alleged failures pale in comparison to Lord Krishna's failures. There is no arguing with a failed peace effort that resulted in the deaths of millions of men (in a mere 18 day period) in which rivers of blood flowed from the carnage!
The hypocrisy never ends from Sanjay Dadlani.
posted by Equalizer @ 10:48 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home