Sanjay Dadlani Exposed

Exposing the lies, deceit and dishonesty of one of the most vocal opponents of Sathya Sai Baba.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Sai Baba's Internet Ban UN-CONFIRMED!

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On his blog, Sanjay poorly attempted to argue that Sathya Sai Baba "banned" his devotees from using the internet. Of course, this claim is patently absurd. Sangay used the following quote to make his case:
Swami has nothing to do with internet. Not only now, even in future also you should not indulge in such wrong activities (Click Here to Read PDF File To Original Discourse).

If read in the proper context, Sathya Sai Baba said that one should not indulge in the wrong activities of "gossip", "mean talk" and "worthless talk". Anti-Sai Activists incorrectly surmised that Sathya Sai Baba said his devotees should not use the internet. Sathya Sai Baba never said that. As a matter of fact, the Sathya Sai Organization has no less than 6 official websites. If Sathya Sai Baba truly banned or prohibited his devotees from using the internet, why would Sathya Sai Baba allow his devotees to create official websites that are specifically put on the internet for his devotees to read?

Official Sathya Sai Baba Websites:

Just more proof that Sanjay & Co. will purposely distort Sathya Sai Baba's words to further their smear and hate campaigns against their former Guru.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Pink Blog Theme

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

For those wondering why I chose a pink color theme for this blog, look at my post entitled: Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion. Since this blog is about Sanjay, I think the pink color theme is entirely appropriate. Enough said :-)

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look
» » Sanjay's Incestuous Homoeroticism
» » Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion
» » Move Over He-Man - Here Comes He-Krsna!
» » Dream About Sanjay
» » "Effeminancy" On Wikipedia?

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Did Dr. Naresh Bhatia Molest Females?

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On the SathyaSaiBabaDiscussionClub Sanjay made some interesting claims about Dr. Naresh Bhatia and the Sathya Sai Baba Sex Scandal.

First of all, Sanjay gave a first hand account against Dr. Bhatia in which he claimed he personally caught Dr. Bhatia engaged in what seemed to be questionable behavior with a female doctor. Sanjay stated:
Your question about Bhatia's daughter needs in-depth explanation so I will oblige you on Monday. Please forgive me Were you present when Dr. Bhatia sexually harassed female doctors, as alleged? No. If not, do you give any credence to this (hearsay) allegation? Why or why not? Yes. Why? Why because I caught him alone in a room with a lady doctor when I went to his department for a blood donation. You should have seen him jump! So when I heard the rumours that he was complained against for harassment, really I was not surprised (Reference).


On another post, Sanjay voiced his doubts regarding the anonymous story published in The Findings that anonymously alleged that Sathya Sai Baba raped a 7-year-old child (which has subsequently been shown to be an utter fabrication). Although none of Sanjay's questions were ever answered about the 7-year-old child (because the story was never true to begin with), Sanjay (after becoming an Anti-Sai Activist) started repeating the lie that Baba raped a 7-year-old child! Sanjay repeated his former claim that Dr. Naresh Bhatia was thrown out of the ashram due to allegations that he was molesting females. Sanjay also claimed that Dr. Bhatia's daughter was caught writing letters to a male student by one of his friends (which would be considered taboo in India), and was almost expelled for doing so! Sanjay stated:
I wish to comment on the case of the seven-year-old child in the Findings? I have addressed this issue several times in the NS club, and here for the first time, so please, no flaming. Now: WHO is this child? Is he still there? WHICH two doctors of the hospital examined him? I trust they are still employed? What leads one to think that it was BHATIA who wrote the article, after all the entire testimony is given by an anonymous individual. Why would Bhatia say such things? You do know that he was thrown out of the ashram because of sexual harassment complaints against him by female doctors? You knew that right?You do know that his daughter (really cute girl) was CAUGHT by a friend of mine "dropping" a letter addressed to a male student, and was threatened with expulsion and came VERY close to actually getting expelled? You knew that, right?Is it any wonder then, that Bhatia comes out about his "sex life" with Sai for 15 years, something which he has never told his own wife? You do know that Bhatia had a spiritually eminent position in the ashram, and I personally saw various students touching his feet? His throwing out wouldn't cause him to get all angry and jealous about it, right? (Reference)

Sanjay's first-hand testimony lends credence to the claim that Dr. N. Bhatia had inappropriate sexual relationships with women and was thrown out of the ashram for this reason. Sanjay also rightly pointed out that Dr. Bhatia (who held a high position) would have been very angry, vindictive and jealous when he was thrown out of the ashram and this could have been the reason why Dr. Bhatia made false claims against Sathya Sai Baba. This most likely seems to be the case since Dr. Bhatia adamantly refused to talk to devotees or proponents of Sathya Sai Baba but instead chose to communicate exclusively with Anti-Sai Activists and those having an Anti-Sai Agenda.

Thanks to Sanjay for strengthening my case and weaking the case made by those opposing Bhagavan Sri Satya Sai Baba :-)

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lies
» » More Lies: Trying to Keep Up
» » Is Tony O'Clery Bisexual/Homosexual And A Molestor?
» » Was Glen Meloy A "Disturbed Person"?
» » Arnold Schulman And The Alleged "Serpentine Lie"
» » The Aghori Vimalananda Lie
» » Kishore Dadlani - Vicious Slanderer Extraordinaire
» » Pious Pretenses
» » Sanjay's Pseudo-Devotee Status
» » The Meat Eating Vegetarian

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Dream About Sanjay

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK


I really do not attribute much value to my dreams, however Sanjay seemed to attribute a lot of significance to an alleged dream he had about Lisa (which I personally do not believe he had). Since Sanjay seems to attribute some significance to dreams, I will relate a dream I had about him last night. The dream was as follows:
I awoke within a house that was filled with a strange darkness. At first I was taken aback, yet I felt that there was some purpose for me being in that house so I floated through a downstairs bedroom and noticed a middle-aged man who seemed physically ill. I left that bedroom and floated to a staircase that ascended to a bedroom located upstairs. Upon entering the upstairs bedroom, I immediately realized it was Sanjay's bedroom. The bedroom was filled with a thick, black fog, yet I was able to see things in the bedroom. The bedroom was cluttered with lots of stuff and there were piles of DVD's, CD's, magazines, books and plastic bags. Sanjay awoke and saw me in his bedroom and stayed silent, quietly and intently staring at me. Sanjay just stood there looking very resigned.

I sensed the Panca-tattva in a crevice on Sanjay's dresser and reached into that crevice and pulled out two deities, one of Sri Nityananda Prabhu and the other of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. These deities were neglected and covered in dust. I pulled them out and placed them on top of Sanay's dresser and the Sri Chaitanya deity was black. I was surprised at this because Sri Chaitanya is often called the "Golden Avatar" and is of very light complexion. As I touched these deities, an awareness descended upon me that my debates with (and exposures about) Sanjay were serving some useful purpose that, at some future time, would wraught a positive transformation within him.

End of dream.

This was definitely a dream because in this dream Sanjay was silent (whereas in real life, he never shuts up) and the thought that some sort of positive transformation would occur within Sanjay is simply unfathomable to me. Of course, I expect that in the near future Sanjay will claim he had some dream about me and will make something up and babble on and on about it (like he did with Lisa).

Oh well, there is always hope in dreams :-)

Predictable Update: June 20th 2006

Just recently, Sanjay accused me of being a homosexual because I allegedly:
1) recently confessed to having intimate dreams about Sanjay
2) publicly displayed an engrossing fascination towards Sanjay, even going so far as to confess the contents of my dreams

One will notice how Sanjay turned my one dream (singular) into "dreams" (plural). Then Sanjay claimed that my wholly non-intimate and non-sexual dream about him was "intimate" and implied I was homosexual for having it! lol Sanjay is a sexually-focused deviant who loves to perversely sexualize everything his opponents say about him. Makes one wonder why Sanjay does this (as he does it so often). Probably because he has been "sucking" too much of his semen into his brain through the alleged practice of urdhvaretas (Reference)! lol

Funny enough, on Sanjay's blog dated November 17th 2005, Sanjay related a dream he had about Sathya Sai Baba in which he was Baba's personal attendent. Sanjay talked about how he helped Baba to the bathroom to urinate, peeked inside to look at Baba, quickly stepped back when Baba turned around and pretended he hadn't witnessed anything. Baba locked Sanjay out and Sanjay felt Baba was going to take a shower. Using the very same logic (illogic) that Sanjay used with me, this must mean that Sanjay has a toilet fetish and is a homosexual because he shared "intimate" details to a dream he had with Sathya Sai Baba!

Sanjay sticks his big foot in his big mouth once again :-)

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look
» » Sanjay's Incestuous Homoeroticism
» » Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion
» » Move Over He-Man - Here Comes He-Krsna!
» » Pink Blog Theme
» » "Effeminancy" On Wikipedia?

Monday, June 12, 2006

Robert Priddy Bashes Sanjays Guru And Beliefs

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Robert Priddy (an Anti-Sai Extremist) wrote an article claiming that Sathya Sai Baba is "One of those many ignorami who sustain and spread false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches."

Apparently, Robert Priddy was also "one of those many ignorami who sustained and spread false beliefs about black magicians and witches" because he was an ardent follower and practitioner of Sathya Sai Baba's teachings for 17 long years! Priddy claimed to have studied Baba's teaching in such depth that he compiled an index (over the course of many years) entitled "Back to the Source" that contained Eighteen Thousand "separately-detailed entries" to Baba's teachings. So if Sathya Sai Baba is an ignorant person who spreads primitive beliefs in black magic and witches, this does not reflect well for Priddy's intelligence and mental state when he was a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba for 17 years!

While perusing my archived copy of Robert Priddy's index "Back To The Source", I discovered that Priddy actually made reference to "black magic", "demons", "evil" and "magic" (meaning that while Priddy was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, he was fully aware of of these teachings and thought they were worthy of being referenced)! The extractions read as follows:
Black magic not inflicted on Sai (heart attacks) 26 S3 16-93 S3
Demon & man, differences between (the 3 Da's) 396f S4 29-157 S5
Demonic type of person: ego/pride/hurtful 2 San 1-93 39-396 S25
Demons as symbol of evil thoughts, feelings, acts 198 San 8-95 19-204 S28
Evil: bring Me all the evil in you & leave it 176 S1 29-181 S1
Evil & egoism etc. poured into the yagna fire 76 V of Div
Evil forces, the product of grief 165 S3 4-23 S4
Evil & good both have right to exist 31 S3 17-99 S3
Evil & good, has ever been a struggle between 4 Geetha-V
Evil & good in world are both Divine expressions 37 San 2-95 1-1f S28
Evil habits: one leads to a whole gang of them 161 S7b 2-14 S11
Evil has potentiality to become good, remember 92 S1 15-89 S1
Evil: How does God, the ruler, permit it? 48f SSai-V
Evil in others, do not seek to discover 70f S10 24-156 S13
Evil in you manifests an obstacle in your path 118 S9 36-211 S12
Evil is from the ego, not from God 216 MyB&I 206 Convers
Evil is to be transformed by good association 32 S3 17-99 S3
Evil looks, thoughts, speech: try to give them up - - 9-75 S19
Evil: none exists except in man's activities 293 San 11-85 - -
Evil: none free from its taint/all need correcting 3 S4 1-4 S3
Evil now widespread & unconfined 153 S3 2-12 S4
Evil, ogres of 194 Bhagav-V
Evil: see, hear, think, talk, do no evil 187 San 7-91 11-122 S24
Evil: see, talk, hear, think, do no evil - but only good 1-7 Kodai-98 - -
Evil traits of many lives not instantly wiped out 39 S11 55-348 S14
Evil traits through many lives & generations 39 S11 - -
Evil used for purpose it's suited to 31 S3 17-99 S3
Evil will be destroyed by Sai 153 S3 2-12 S4
Evil won't affect the compassionate, true server 113 San 5-93 14-138 S26
Evil-doers, now no question of extermination of 23 S2 2-5 S2
Evil-minded elders, avoid (even if your own parents) 131 San 5-99
Magic; both black & white types do exist 227 S4 49-285 S4
Magic, miracle outwardly & leela inwardly 100 S2 18-91 S2

Right out of Priddy's own mouth when he was a devotee and among the "ignorami who sustain and spread false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches"!

Click Here to read an amusing article written by Robert Priddy (going back to 1988) in which he sustains and spreads false beliefs about "elves, fairies, leprechauns, gnomes, trolls, water spirits, animal and plant spirits or 'devas' , angels, invisible helpers, shaman 'spirits', 'allies', UFOs, extra-terrestrials, possessive demons, Satan, Pan-figures and other demi-gods"! Robert Priddy is a deeply conflicted person who not only criticizes others for their beliefs, but attempts (very hard) to suppress information about his beliefs that would include him among the ranks of "ignorami" who sustain and spread false beliefs in superstitious phenomena (even believing that a lizard and butterfly were supernatural manifestations of elemental spirits)!

Ironically enough, although Robert Priddy silently endorses Sanjay Dadlani (a Gaudiya Vaishnava Hare Krishna wannabee), Priddy indirectly and thoroughly bashed Sanjay's belief in scriptures that happen to promote "false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches"! Robert Priddy indirectly called Sanjay Dadlani's Guru (Srila Prabhupada) and the MahaBhagavata Sukadev Goswami, "ignorami" (both discuss black magic as if it was real)! Furthermore, Priddy indirectly bashed Sanjay's scriptures (Srimad Bhagavatam and the Bhagavad Gita As It Is) as "spreading false beliefs about black magicians and witches"! Funny how Anti-Sai Activists take such a variegated stance against Sathya Sai Baba that they end up bashing each other in the process and appear very foolish and clumsy as well.

Let us look at some quotes about black magic, vampires, hobgoblins, demons and ghosts (also known as "Yaksas" and "Raksasas") as discussed by the Srimad Bhagavatam and Srila Prabhupada:

Srimad Bhagavatam 10.55.21: Resorting to the black magic of the Daityas taught to him by Maya Danava, Sambara suddenly appeared in the sky and released a downpour of weapons upon Krishna's son.

Srimad Bhagavatam 10.66.40: Frustrated by the power of Lord Krishna's weapon, O King, the fiery creature produced by black magic turned his face away and retreated. Created for violence, the demon then returned to Varanasi, where he surrounded the city and then burned Sudakshina and his priests to death, even though Sudakshina was his creator.

Bhagavad-gita As It Is 9.25 (summary by Srila Prabhupada): Similarly, one can attain the Pita planets by performing a specific yajna. Similarly, one can go to many ghostly planets and become a Yaksha, Raksha or Pisaca. Pisaca worship is called "black arts" or "black magic." There are many men who practice this black art, and they think that it is spiritualism, but such activities are completely materialistic. Similarly, a pure devotee, who worships the Supreme Personality of Godhead only, achieves the planets of Vaikuntha and Krishnaloka without a doubt. It is very easy to understand through this important verse that if by simply worshiping the demigods one can achieve the heavenly planets, or by worshiping the Pitas achieve the Pita planets, or by practicing the black arts achieve the ghostly planets, why can the pure devotee not achieve the planet of Krishna or Vishnu? Unfortunately many people have no information of these sublime planets where Krishna and Vishnu live, and because they do not know of them they fall down.

Srimad Bhagavatam 10.66 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): Lord Siva advised him to worship the Dakshinagni fire with black magic rituals. This Sudakshina did, with the result that a fearsome demon with a body of flames appeared from the pit of the sacrificial fire. The demon rose up carrying a fiery trident and at once set off for Dvaraka.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 3:20-21: The demons who were born from the body of Brahma were called Yaksas and Raksasas because some of them cried that Brahma should be eaten and the others cried that he should not be protected. The ones who said that he should be eaten were called Yaksas, and the ones who said that he should not be protected became Raksasas, man-eaters. The two, Yaksas and Raksasas, are the original creation by Brahma and are represented even until today in the uncivilized men who are scattered all over the universe. They are born of the mode of ignorance, and therefore, because of their behavior, they are called Raksasas, or man-eaters.

Bhagavad-gita 9:25 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): Similarly, one can go to many ghostly planets and become a Yaksa, Raksa or Pisaca. Pisaca worship is called "black arts" or "black magic." There are many men who practice this black art, and they think that it is spiritualism, but such activities are completely materialistic.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 4:18:21 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): There are some types of living entities in the form of human beings whose living conditions and eatables are most abominable. Generally they eat flesh and fermented blood, which is mentioned in this verse as ksatajasavam. The leaders of such degraded men known as Yaksas, Raksasas, bhutas and pisacas, are all in the mode of ignorance. They have been placed under the control of Rudra. Rudra is the incarnation of Lord Siva and is in charge of the mode of ignorance in material nature. Another name of Lord Siva is Bhutanatha, meaning "master of ghosts." Rudra was born from between Brahma's eyes when Brahma was very angry at the four Kumaras.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 4:10:28 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): The demon Yaksas are by nature very heinous, and by their demoniac power of illusion they can create many strange phenomena to frighten one who is less intelligent.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 3:20:19 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): Out of disgust, Brahma threw off the body of ignorance, and taking this opportunity, Yaksas and Raksasas sprang for possession of the body, which continued to exist in the form of night. Night is the source of hunger and thirst.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 6:8:24: O club in the hand of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, you produce sparks of fire as powerful as thunderbolts, and you are extremely dear to the Lord. I am also His servant. Therefore kindly help me pound to pieces the evil living beings known as Kusmandas, Vainayakas, Yaksas, Raksasas, Bhutas and Grahas. Please pulverize them.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 10:4:15 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): Raksasas are understood to be accustomed to eating their own sons, as snakes and many other animals sometimes do. At the present moment in Kali-yuga, Raksasa fathers and mothers are killing their own children in the womb, and some are even eating the fetus with great relish. Thus the so-called civilization is gradually advancing by producing Raksasas.

Srimad-Bhagavatam 10:6:4 (Summary by Srila Prabhupada): Raksasis learn mystic powers by which they can travel in outer space without machines. In some parts of India there are still such mystical witches, who can sit on a stick and use it to fly from one place to another in a very short time. This art was known to Putana. Assuming the feature of a very beautiful woman, she entered Nanda Maharaja's abode, Gokula."

Canto 10, Chapter 63: The Fever in Conflict and Bana Defeated: Discharging sharp-pointed arrows from His bow, the S'arnga, drove S'auri [Krishna] away the Bhutas [spirits of the dead], the Pramathas [mystic spirits], the Guhyakas [the wealth-keepers of Kuvera], the Dakinis [female imps of Kali], the Yatudhanas [practicioners of black magic], Vetalas [vampires], the Vinayakas [demons of education, distracters, humiliaters], the Pretas [ghosts, hobgoblins], the Matas [demoniac mothers], the Pis'acas [child-demons], the Kushmandas [meditation-disturbers, diseasing demons] and the Brahma-rakshasas [fallen brahmins].


Apparently, Robert Priddy is taking jabs and making jests at Sanjay Dadlani's primitive beliefs, scriptures and gurus who are "many ignorami who sustain and spread false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches".

Poor Sanjay! Even his Anti-Sai buddies consider him brainwashed (although they are not bold enough to come right out and say it). Probably because they suffered from the very same brainwashing they are now attempting to expose in others. The weirdness never ends with Anti-Sai Activists. lol

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Robert Priddy: The Pseudo-Moralist
» » Blog Exposing Robert Priddy

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Is Tony O'Clery Bisexual/Homosexual And A Molestor?

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Back in September 2001, Sanjay claimed that he personally knew a male "informant", first-hand, who claimed that both Tony O'Clery and David Bailey had sex with him. Not only that, Sanjay claimed that Tony O'Clery was banned from the Vancouver Sai Center for sexual molestation.

Needless to say, Anthony "Tony" O'Clery denied these claims. O'clery said:
Sanjay produced an informant that alleged that I had sex with him, that Bailey had sex with him, and that I supposedly was banned from the Vancouver centre for molestation, phew what a calumnous liar that sanjay was. I'm glad that now the impediments on him now have been released and he can see sb for what he is. I have my doubts though. (Reference)


Since September 2001, Sanjay has never retracted these comments against O'Clery. As a matter of fact, Sanjay adamantly refuses to state why he made these comments against O'Clery in the first place. Consequently, one can only wonder whom this first-hand "informant" was, how he knew Sanjay and why he would claim that he had sex with Tony O'Clery and David Bailey if he didn't.

Since Anti-Sai Activists support, cheer and promote Kishore Dadlani, one is left to conclude that there is some truth in what Sanjay alleged against Tony O'Clery. However, this information will never be brought to light because Anti-Sai Activists converted Sanjay to their side before he disclosed any more information about his "informant" and how he got his information that Anthony O'Clery's was banned from the Vancouver Sai Center for sexual molestation.

How convenient.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Stunning Tony O'Clery & Glen Meloy Update
» » Blog Exposing Anthony Tony O'Clery

Was Glen Meloy A "Disturbed Person"?

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK


Glen Meloy was an Anti-Sai Activist who propagated many blatant lies about Sathya Sai Baba. Glen Meloy died on January 1st 2005 from cancer. Sanjay Dadlani published a post about Meloy on December 8th 2000 that stated:
Glen Meloy is a disturbed person.

I also know a few things about him that are quite distasteful and can potentially ruin his reputation, so I will not go into it here.

Needless to say, the guy doesn't really understand much. It is doubtful if he ever did. He has very little knowledge about the lives of Jesus, Rama and Krishna, yet he manages to find them a place in his letter?

Too much of hot air. (Reference)

Since December 2000, Sanjay never retracted his comments against Glen Meloy. Even after Meloy died, Sanjay adamantly refused to withdraw his former comments against him.

Consequently, one can only wonder what evidence Sanjay had against Glen Meloy that would have proved Meloy was truly a "disturbed person". One is also left to wonder what "quite distasteful" things Sanjay knew about Meloy that could have "potentially ruined his reputation".

Since Anti-Sai Activists support, cheer and promote Kishore Dadlani, one is left to conclude that there were, indeed, "quite distasteful" facts about Glen Meloy that were purposely suppressed by Anti-Sai Activists. According to Sanjay, these "quite distateful" facts would have proved that Meloy was truly a "disturbed person" and could have "potentially ruined his reputation". However, this information will never be brought to light because Anti-Sai Activists converted Sanjay to their side before he disclosed this information.

How convenient.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Stunning Tony O'Clery & Glen Meloy Update

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Sanjay, 666, Incest, Satan, & Alleged Christian Sciptures

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Just recently, Sanjay published an amusing blog-entry about Sathya Sai Baba being "born of incest" and cited an alleged biblical passage (taken from the fictional horror movie "Lost Souls") that alluded to a man being born of incest that would eventually become Satan. The relevant quote that Sanjay cited was:

A man born of incest Will become Satan. And the world as we know it Will be no more. (Deuteronomy 17)

Apparently, Sanjay is completely unaware that this alleged Biblical quote does not exist. Any person (with even the most remedial knowledge of the Bible) knows that the quote ascribed to Deuteronomy 17 bears no resemblance to any passage in the 5th book of the Pentateuch, or any other section in the canon. The Deuteronomy quote, cited from the horror movie "Lost Souls", is a fictional quote. Therefore, Sanjay's reference to this quote thoroughly negates any and all inferences he attempted to draw from it.

Sanjay also felt it was important to publish this post on 6-6-06. This is of little surprise considering Sanjay's Satanic Inclinations and reading of the Satanic Bible due to his "seriously contemplating on and accepting the possibility of the darker forces in life".

Sanjay attempted to argue that since Sathya Sai Baba's father and mother were "cousins", Baba was "born of incest", and therefore is the "Satan" alluded to in the non-existent Deuteronomy 17 passage.

Incest is sex between closely related family members: Reference. In Kasturi's Sathyam Shivam Sundaram (published in 1961), it specifically stated that:
He (Kodama) desired to bring his distant relatives, Subba Raju and family, nearer to Puttaparthi...

Therefore, although Sai Baba's father and mother were distantly related, this does not constitute, by definition, "incest". Leave it to Sanjay, the stalking and deviant porn pervert, to redefine the word "incest" to suit his defamatory campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba.

There are several interesting observations that can be made about Sanjay's poorly researched and puerile article against Sathya Sai Baba. First of all, Sanjay attempted to argue against incest by citing the Bible. This was Sanjay's first mistake.

The Bible is full of incest. Examples: Milcah (the sister of Lot) married her uncle Nahor; Lot's two daughters got their father drunk, had sex with him and give birth to his children; In one of the stories about Abraham, Sarah is his half sister (in Rabbinic literature, Sarah is Abraham's neice); Isaac married his second cousin Rebekah; Esau married two of his first cousins (the sisters Mahalath and Basemath); Jacob marries two of his first cousins daughters of his mother's brother; Laban; Judah mistakes his daughter-in-law Tamar for a prostitute and impregnates her; Amram married his paternal aunt; Zelophehad's five daughters married their cousins on their father's side; Adam and Eve's children had to engage in sex with each other in order to populate the Earth; and Amnon rapes his beautiful half-sister Tamar.

Secondly, Sanjay is a Hare Krishna wannabee. In scriptures that Sanjay defends, Lord Krishna is alleged to have lived in incest with his sister Subhadra (sharing her with his brother Balarama). The Rig Veda mentioned that the "Vedic Pushan is the lover of his sister". There are stories about how Lord Krishna's 16,000 drunken wives (yes, all allegedly married to one person) were ready to commit incest with Krishna's son, Samba. As a result of this incident, Lord Krishna cursed Samba to be afflicted with leprosy (how compassionate) and cursed his 16,000 wives to be carried off by barbarians after his death (which allegedly happened right before Arjuna's eyes). There are also references to Agni having sex with his sister and that Agni was born from the union of his father and his father's sister. Then there is Lord Brahma's incest with his daughter Saraswati.

Far be it for Sanjay to argue against incest when both his scriptures and the Bible are full of incest. Far be it for Sanjay to argue against incest when he doesn't even know the proper definition for "incest"! And far be it for Sanjay to infer that Sathya Sai Baba is Satan by citing a non-existent passage from Deuteronomy 17!

Just when one would think this could not get even more ridiculous, Sanjay is a confirmed Jesus Sex Fetishist who was caught, with his pants down, requesting (of all things) Jesus Pornography and attempted (admittedly) to get more sex with women by trying to look like Jesus Christ (Reference)!

This is the pervert who is citing non-existent Biblical passages and is trying to use Christian concepts against Sathya Sai Baba (although Sanjay is not a Christian)! Furthermore, there is little doubt that Christians would consider Sanjay Dadlani an idolator and a heathen (as he worships doll-deities that he considers to be God Incarnate on his altar)! These same Christian Scriptures put Sanjay is a very tenuous and abominable position himself.

Such is the "exposer" of Sathya Sai Baba. The only time Sanjay opens his mouth is to stick his other foot in it.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » The Angel Of Death: Azra`iL
» » Sanjay's Satanic Inclinations
» » Sanjay And The Satanic Bible

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Arnold Schulman And The Alleged "Serpentine Lie"

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK


Sanjay made the following comments about the "Serpentine Lie" based on information he obtained from Arnold Schulman's book "Baba":
Just one example of this relates to the tale of a cobra, which allegedly appeared miraculously after Sathyanarayana Raju (Sai Baba's birth name) was born. As Schulman noted: "One of Baba's two sisters, however, who claims to have been present at his birth, says that the cobra was not found under the blanket, but several hours after Baba was born a cobra was seen outside the house, a sight not uncommon in the village." It is curious to see how this significantly differs from several "official" accounts of the cobra event.

The funny thing about this is how N. Kasturi claimed to have collected his material by interviewing various family members and villagers. Kasturi dated this incidence as happening in July 1948, and later reveals that the book was finally published in 1960. Assuming that he included Baba's own sister in his research project, that left a comfortable twelve years for compiling and publishing an authorised biography with the input of Sai Baba and several contemporaries. How fascinating it is to observe a close member of the Baba's family disagreeing with a staple of the Sai mythos, leading one to wonder why Kasturi's little anecdote was allowed to be left in at all? For me, the reason was clear; the propaganda machine thought nothing of overblowing this out of all proportion in order to promote the idea that Sai Baba is an incarnation of Vishnu.

In conclusion, we can carefully consider that there is a huge gulf between facts and interpretations of those facts. If anything tangible is to be gleaned from Schulman's quote, it is that Sai Baba aggressively halted discussion about his past for a clear reason; the stories of all or most of his early escapades are probably untrue.

Needless to say, Sanjay did not tell the whole story regarding Schulman's alleged "serpentine lie". Sanjay forgot to turn the page and read what Schulman had to say about Baba' sister and how he obtained information from her. Arnold Schulman said:
In some cases interpreters were needed to interpret the interpreters, as in the case of the interviews with one of Baba's sisters who spoke only Telugu. At that particular time the available interpreters were a young man who spoke only HIndi and English, but no Telugu, and another young man who spoke Telugu and Hindi but no English. Everything the sister said had to be translated by one of the young men from Telugu into Hindi and then by the other young man from Hindi into English. Not only was this procedure frustratingly time-consuming but after being filtered through two separate and distinct personalities, what the writer was told the sister said might very well have been something quite different from what she actually said.

Are we to believe Kasturi (who actually spoke Telugu and had close, repeated, long-term and intimate access to Baba's sister) or are we to believe Schulman (who did not have close, repeated, long-term and intimate access to Baba's sister and who relied on translators to translate other translators as to what Baba's sister allegedly said)? I think the answer is perfectly clear.

No one can believe anything Sanjay Dadlani says. Sanjay repeatedly engages in inaccurate paraphrasing and quote-mining in an attempt to build a sand-castle using highly selective and misleading information. Sanjay also has a disturbing propensity to read something, obsess about it and draw wild and neutotic conclusions. An example of this type of behavior is when I used the word "poo" 14 times in my article about Jody Radzik (the Guruphiliac webmaster: Reference). Although Jody Radzik often used the word "poop" and "shit" to make his arguments against Gurus, Sanjay thinks nothing of Jody's usage of explicit words referring to fecal material. However, when I used the word "poo" (a very mild word to refer to fecal material) 14 times (out of a 5,484 word article or a .0025% word percentage), Sanjay irrationally and neurotically concluded that I was a "toilet sex pervet" and had a "fascination for fecal material"! Sanjay is the type of emotionally unstable and mentally questionable individual who tries to take an intellectual stand against Sathya Sai Baba and miserably fails.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lies
» » More Lies: Trying to Keep Up
» » Did Dr. Naresh Bhatia Molest Females?
» » Is Tony O'Clery Bisexual/Homosexual And A Molestor?
» » Was Glen Meloy A "Disturbed Person"?
» » The Aghori Vimalananda Lie
» » Kishore Dadlani - Vicious Slanderer Extraordinaire
» » Pious Pretenses
» » Sanjay's Pseudo-Devotee Status
» » The Meat Eating Vegetarian

Saturday, June 03, 2006

The Aghori Vimalananda Lie

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Click Here to read a discussion between Evakurvan and Sanjay Dadlani (using the name "Gaurasundara") about Aghori Vimalananda. Evakurvan rightly pointed out some amazing claims made by Sanjay and facts that wholly refuted Sanjay's claims about meeting Aghori Vimalananda.

Dadlani's response to Evakurvan was as follows:
Now, was I ever a disciple of Vimalananda? No. I met him on a few occasions and attended some of the informal lectures he used to hold in his house. This was a few months before he died. When I asked him about the possibilitiy of becoming his disciple [this was before I came to GV], he refused and said that his teachings would be published in some books, and that I should read those books. So did I receive some "secret tantra instructions" from him? No. I got it from his books, just like anyone can, as well as picking up some tips from his more senior disciples. As for the date of his death and my age at the time, this is pure nonsense. Anyone who has even a single clue about Vimalananda knows how enigmatic he was. He deliberately avoided certain situations just so he could avoid creating new karmic connections, which he felt were an obstacle towards his own deliverance. The date of his death was deliberately changed (read, put back to an earlier date) just so anyone who tried to seek out any records of him and his family could not do so. After his death, people have tried to seek his family out but they have moved away. To suggest that he died in 1983 and I was 5 years old, do you really think I am so stupid to talk about an episode of my life and open myself to criticism?

Therefore, Sanjay explicity claimed:
  • That he personally met Aghori Vimalananda "on a few occasions and attended some of the informal lectures he used to hold in his house" a few months before he died.

  • Asked Aghori Vimalananda about "the possiblity of becoming his disciple".

  • Aghori Vimalananda personally told him that book would be published about him and that he should wait for those books to be published (meaning that no books had yet been published).

  • That Aghori Vimalananda's date of death was put back to an earlier date.

  • Sanjay stated that he did not receive "secret tantra instuctions" from Aghori Vimalananda (the significance of this will be made shortly).

Click Here to view Dork Knight's response to Sanjay Dadlani (using the name Dark Knight). In this post, Sanjay said:
To answer your question, yes I was fortunate to meet Vimalananda in person. When he unfortunately passed away, some authentic astologer who lived near the are said that it would be at least 10,000 years before someone like him will be born again. Maybe it is an exaggeration, but knowing Vimalananda it is quite believable.

To be honest, I cannot remember every single detail of my meetings with him since it was quite some time ago, but one particular instruction he gave me was that he intended Svoboda (even then) to write about his own experiences regarding Vimalananda, and that I should read those books. So really, a few personal secret instructions about tantra-sadhana coupled with the knowledge found in the Aghora trilogy is what I know of Vimalananda's "philosophy." I know this because I was there when Vimalananda told him not to go home, and I heard from the wife what happened afterwards.

Therefore, Sanjay explicity claimed:
  • Again, that he personally met Aghori Vimalananda.

  • Again, that that he met Aghori Vimalananda prior to Svoboda writing his books on the Aghori and was personally instructed by the Aghori to read those books when they came out.

  • That he personally received a "few personal secret instructions about tantra-sadhana" from Aghori Vimalananda (which contradicts Sanjay's earlier claim that he did not receive "secret tantra instructions" from the Aghori).

On the former Istagosthi.org site Sanjay said the following (Reference):
What was my motivation to learn Aghora? At the time I had met Vimalananda who was a very great Aghori (it will be 10,000 years before someone like him is born again, thats how great he is) who convinced me that Maa was the supreme object of devotion. I was not a Vaishnava then, I was a Shaiva so I didn't really have any problems with this philosophy since worship of Shiva automatically includes his wife as well. So anyway I learnt all of these sexual tricks ansd may other Ahori rites of passage that are in fact extremely valuable to the spiritual aspirant who can be follwing ANY spiritual path. There are certain principles that are the common basis of all religions and spiritual paths, and I learnt these. Was I interested in Aghora to reach Maa, or wa smy devotion false and did I just want a quick lay in the guise of spirituality? Reflectively, it was obviously the latter in not so many words.

Since I was only a student (with incomlete training) I could last max 30-40 minutes. After I left my Aghora training and became a Vaishnava, I noted that some of my sexual and magical skills decreased a little, with the result that I became seriously depressed about the likelihood of becoming impotent earlier than expected.

He was afflicted with lust and was very keen on going home to have sex with his wife. Vimalananda repeatedly told him not to do so, knowing that what he was experiencing were the last throes of physical lust, but this guy thought he was too smart. So off he went home, had sex with his wife twice that night and fell asleep. In the morning he became a raving lunatic, babbling incoherently and spending 23 hours with his head underneath a cold tap. A day later he died. I know this because I was there when Vimalananda told him not to go home, and I heard from the wife what happened afterwards.

Therefore, Sanjay explicity claimed:
  • Again, that he pesonally met Aghori Vimalananda.

  • At the time of being with the Aghori, he learned "sexual tricks and many other Aghori rites of passage".

  • That he was interested in Aghora because he wanted "a quick lay in the guise of spirituality".

  • At that time, he was a student who learned how to keep his penis erect for 30-40 minutes max.

  • That he was personally present when Aghori Vimalananda told a man not to have sex with his wife and not to go home.

Click Here (look for highlighted sections) or Click Here (for the original profile) where Sanjay claimed, on his GaudiyaDiscussions.com profile that:
1998 - While with this pseudo-guru, I had undertaken an orthodox study of AdvaitavAda philosophy as well as being taught Vama-marga Aghora by Vimalananda for a brief while.

Therefore, Sanjay explicity claimed:
  • That he was personally taught Varma-marga Aghora by Vimalananda in 1998.

PROVING SANJAY LIED


First of all, Sanjay Dadlani was born on September 16th 1978. Vimalananda died in 1983 (meaning that Dadlani was 5 years old at that time). Robert Svoboda (the actual disciple of Vimalananda) said: "One of his fiercest lessons to me was his dying in my arms on December 12, 1983. That heartbreak was itself a reprise of his first lesson, delivered within the first days of our friendship more than eight years before, when he had predicted that I would cremate him" (Reference).

Svoboda's first book, Aghora: At the left hand of God, was first published in 1986. Since Dadlani clearly said that he was with Vimalananda prior to Svoboda publishing his books (Vimalananda allegedly told Dadlani to wait for these books to come out), Dadlani was younger than 7 years old when he allegedly met Vimalananda! Svoboda only wrote about Vimalananda after he died. Even if Dadlani is correct about Vimalananda's date of death being changed (I doubt it), the date could not have been changed by much (as Svoboda published his first book in 1986). Of course, it would have taken at least (conservatively) one year to write this book. Consequently, Vimalananda would have died, at the latest, in 1985 (making Sanjay a spunky 7 years old tot).

So how did Dadlani, as a 7 year old child receive "secret instructions about tantra-sadhana" from Vimalananda, learn "sexual tricks" and why was he trying to make his penis stay erect for 30-40 minutes max, at the tender age of seven? Also, why (as a 7 year old child) would he be having sex, visualizing himself as Shiva and his partner as Shakti if his desire was basically for a "quick lay in the guise of spirituality"? This is exactly what Sanjay claimed happened to him when he was 7 years old!

As if this isn't ridiculous enough, on the Gaudiya Discussions site, Dadlani claimed: "1998 - While with this pseudo-guru, I had undertaken an orthodox study of AdvaitavAda philosophy as well as being taught Vama-marga Aghora by Vimalananda for a brief while" How was Dadlani being taught Vama-marga by Vimalananda in 1998, when he passed away in 1983 (15 years before Sanjay claimed he was taught by him)?

Another amusing contradiction is when Dadlani said, "So did I receive some 'secret tantra instructions' from him? No. I got it from his books, just like anyone can, as well as picking up some tips from his more senior disciples." Later, Dadlani said, "...but one particular instruction he gave me was that he intended Svoboda (even then) to write about his own experiences regarding Vimalananda, and that I should read those books. So really, a few personal secret instructions about tantra-sadhana coupled with the knowledge found in the Aghora trilogy is what I know of Vimalananda's 'philosophy'." Even after meeting such a great Aghori as vimalananda, Sanjay completely contradicted himself as to whether or not he received "secret instructions" from Vimalananda!

Dadlani also made unbelievable claims to knowing "sadhus in India who lived to be over 300 years old". What are their names and when did he meet them? Dadlani also said, "if you conserve your semen properly, you can live to be thousands of years old" (see my article A Seminal Discussion On Ojas, Urdhvaretas And Kishore Dadlani)! These type of statements sound like they come from someone who is thoroughly brainwashed and utterly gullible. Dadlani's disturbing claims, when combined with his other equally outrageous assertions and online behavior, gives the valid impresssion that Dadlani has a chronic and habitual propensity to lie and exaggerate.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lies
» » More Lies: Trying to Keep Up
» » Did Dr. Naresh Bhatia Molest Females?
» » Is Tony O'Clery Bisexual/Homosexual And A Molestor?
» » Was Glen Meloy A "Disturbed Person"?
» » Arnold Schulman And The Alleged "Serpentine Lie"
» » Kishore Dadlani - Vicious Slanderer Extraordinaire
» » Pious Pretenses
» » Sanjay's Pseudo-Devotee Status
» » The Meat Eating Vegetarian

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Sanjay's Love Life Trumps London Attacks

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On July 7th 2005 four devastating explosions ripped across central London killing 52 people and injuring 700 others (Reference). Also, on July 21st there were four more attempted bomb attacks in which only detonators exploded (each as powerful as a large firework).

For the record, Sanjay was never near these areas when either of these attacks occurred. Sanjay never sustained any sort of injuries and never even witnessed the incidents first-hand.

What was Sanjay's response to these bomb attacks? In a purely egocentric and selfish way, Sanjay never expressed any remorse or condolences for the dead or injured. Rather, Sanjay pathetically whined (admittedly) that his ex-girlfriend Anna didn't contact HIM to see if HE was okay (although he was never in harms way)! THAT was Sanjay concern! Forget the scores of people killed and the hundreds of people injured. Sanjay's primary concern was that Anna (his ex-girlfriend who dumped him like a load of bricks) didn't contact HIM and that no one cared about HIM!

This type of egocentricity was discussed by Sanjay on his former killuminati blog. Sanjay talked about his inability to understand other's emotions except his. Sanjay said:
It's almost like my entire soul seems to be filled with poison. I don't know how else to describe it. I either feel just very vacant or empty, and at other times I just feel consumed by bitterness, anger and hatred. Consumed by poison. It's like when I close my eyes, I can actually feel the loneliness surrounding me, choking and suffocating me. Or at least my senses seem to sink within myself and become dull. A pessimistic attitude tints my vision and I cannot seem to understand other people's emotions except mine.

Here is Sanjay's post about the London Attacks taken from his former killuminati blog. This was Sanjay's response the day after the second attempted bomb attacks occurred:

Friday, July 22, 2005
Target LONDON!

I was kinda very pissed last night when I related how Anna didn't seem to care enough about me to ask if I was ok after the London bomb attacks 2 weeks ago. Felt very bitter about it and still am. It appears that London has suffered MORE attacks earlier today. This time a bomb went off at Warren Street Station, where I was hanging out at just YESTERDAY. Missed the chance to see Nikina and Vaishnava though, but hey, my brushes with death are coming closer and closer. Is it time for me to die?

Who the fuck cares anyway? Anna certainly doesn't.

And everyone keeps telling me, she needs her time to think, and blah blah. Like I give a fuck. No one seems to care about me or how I feel. I have reduced myself to whining on the virtual shoulder of an electronic blog, how sad is that? Hey, it helps. At least I can get it all out of me.

I can't stand this stupid silent treatment while she has to go "find herself" or whatever. It's like she doesn't even have the slightest bit of respect for me or anything. I feel so insulted. Who in their right minds cannot even find it within themselves to even inquire if some people are alright after a major terrorist attack on their country? I had so many old mates crawling out of the woodwork, but the ONE person I really needed has not even been there for me since I got back from Sri Lanka. That sucks serious ass.

I've told a few people how I'm starting to get increasingly pissed about it. Something that puzzles me is the relationship cycle. It is supposed to broadly split into four parts; denial, anger, grief, acceptance. I don't even know which stage I'm at, I seem to be fluctuating continuously between the first three and am inching towards the fourth, and then it's back to Square One. I tell you what, though, I fucking HATE it when people automatically assume that it's ALWAYS the guy's fault when a relationship breaks up. Monte told me as much, and I suspect Verum does too, which is why he seems to be ignoring me. Some mate he is. Another one who I had to support when he broke up with his chick, and is not around when I am in need. I thought he was a real mate, but seems that even he's abandoned me too. How nice. More and more I am getting so much pissed off.

When I was with Anna, it was the most magical thing ever. I couldn't believe it. I coold feel the gentleness of it all. It wa so joyful, just being with her. At least I got a chance to experience some of that. Maybe I was not destined for it, and thus it slipped through my fingers. Let me die alone. Just leave me to die alone. Let them find my body six months after I have died, why should I give a fuck? No one cares.

Nothing like a heartless and depressed egotist to defame Sathya Sai Baba and defend the Anti-Sai Movement! As anyone can see, Sanjay's opinions about Sathya Sai Baba are wholly compromised when one takes into consideration his very long and very troubled history of pathological lies, selfishness, pervertedness and depression. Sanjay (whom appears to be in need of anti-depressant medication) vents his frustration and venom on Sathya Sai Baba because that is the only way he gets a reaction & response out of people. Standing on his own merits, Sanjay is so boring and bilious, no one wants to be around him or listen to him (which is a frequent complaint of his)! And with good reason.