Blog Index Of Articles This Month

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Blog Index Of Articles For October 2006:

Exposing Jody Radzik: Guruphiliac Webmaster:
- Pictures of Guruphiliac Webmaster (Jody Radzik)
- Guruphiliac & SaiBabaExposed Blogs

"Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" Responses:
- Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1
- Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2
- Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3

Miscellaneous:
- Sanjay's Sympathy For Terrorists And Murderers
- "Effeminancy" On Wikipedia?
- Sanjay's Incestuous Homoeroticism
- The Cow Hating Leather Fetishist
- Stunning Tony O'Clery & Glen Meloy Update
- Sanjay Begs For Sathya Sai Baba
- *POW* Right On The Kisser
- Sathya Sai Baba Birthdate Debate
- Sanjay Dadlani's Fake Identity
- AbusedFor15Years / UsedByBaba Lies
- What Alan Kazlev Thought About Sanjay Dadlani
- Successor Of Sai Baba?
- Related Blogs - Exposing The Exposers

Previous Blogged Articles:
- Blog Index Of Articles (Dec 05 - Sept 06)

*POW* Right On The Kisser

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Just recently, the Anti-Sai Siamese-Twins (Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard) publicly humiliated Sanjay and gave him a whopping blow to the face when they said the following (in response to Venkataraman's stories about Lord Rama's drama with Ravana, Sabari, Jatayu, Sugriva, etc., in the Ramayana):

"Nor can any intelligent person make good or relevant sense of it in the modern world – it is just a fantastic, impossible concocted story of the 'Superman' kind – with 'monkey-man' Hanuman lifting and flying aloft with a whole mountain (so Rama could pick out a herb from it!) or jumping across the sea to Sri Lanka. Come on, how can one be so backward intellectually? This may be o.k. for ignorant peasants, but the thinking world must regard it as sheer delusion!"

Did you get that Sanjay?

...it is just a fantastic, impossible concocted story of the 'Superman' kind...

Come on, how can one be so backward intellectually?

This may be o.k. for ignorant peasants, but the thinking world must regard it as sheer delusion!

The reason why this is so amusing is because Sanjay is a Hare Krishna Congregational Member who happens to be one those "backward intellectually" "ignorant peasants" who believes in "impossible concocted stories of the 'Superman' kind"!

That's right, Sanjay fully believes that the Ramayana, Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam are Divine Scriptures that document literal and historical miracles, lilas, manifestations and paranormal events in the lives of Avatars (incarnations of God). Sanjay fully believes in the "superman" miracles and stories attributed to Lord Ramachandra, Lord Krishna, Hanuman (the Monkey God) etc. As a matter of fact, Sanjay engaged me in a fierce debate in which he defended his belief that Lord Krishna literally manifested 16,000 human forms, married 16,000 separate wives and procreated with each one of them producing innumerable offspring!

What makes this even more weird is that Sanjay is a staunch defender of the same people (Priddy & Pittard) who openly mock his religious beliefs! This is not the first time that Robert Priddy bashed Sanjay's religious beliefs. Priddy formerly bashed Sanjay as being: "One of those many ignorami who sustain and spread false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches." See For Yourself.

Niiiiiiice friends you have there, Sanjay.


Sanjay is the black sheep of the Anti-Sai Movement. Keeping in character with his outcast role, Sanjay bleets "Baa Baa" "Baa Baa", obsessively tracking Sathya Sai Baba-related news so he can twist it for his Anti-Sai friends who use him and his big mouth for their own nefarious ends.

Sathya Sai Baba Birthdate Debate

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani recently published three blogged articles pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba's birthday date and stated that there is conclusive proof that Sathya Sai Baba was not born on November 23rd 1926, but rather was born on October 4th 1929. As will be shown, Sanjay's conclusive proof is not conclusive at all.

First and foremost, Sanjay's critiques and criticisms about Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate are not unique. Sanjay heavily relied on Brian Steel's past research regarding this matter and re-packaged it, trying to pass it off as something new. It isn't.

Sanjay believes that he has conclusively proven that Sathya Sai Baba was born on October 4th 1929 based exclusively on the following four "proofs":

1. One Kamalapuram school transfer certificate that showed Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate as "October 4th 1929".


2. One Bukkapatnam school record that showed Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate as "October 4th 1929".


3. One Uravakonda school record that showed Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate as "October 4th 1939" (which was corrected to "October 4th 1929" 33 years later by some unknown person).


4. One quote from the book "Anyatha Saranam Nasthi" - by Smt. Vijayamma Hemchand (aka Kuppam Vijayamma), a Sai Devotee.

That's it.

MENU (click on link to go to relevant section)
Kamalapuram Transfer Certificate Details
Bukkapatnam School Record Details
Uravakonda School Record Details
Vijayamma's "Anyatha Saranam Nasthi" Citation
Brian Steel's Observation
LIMF's (Love Is My Form) Clarification
In Conclusion

Now, let us take a look at Sanjay's four "proofs".

KAMALAPURAM TRANSFER CERTIFICATE DETAILS:
Return To Menu

*Name of the school which the pupil is leaving: B.M. School Kamalapuram
*Name of the pupil: Ratnakaram Satyanarayana
*Date of birth as entered in the admission register: 4.10.1929 (Fourth October Nineteen Twenty Nine)
*Class or form in which the pupil was [unintelligible] at the time of leaving (in words): First Form
*Date of admission or promotion to that class or form: 11.6.40
*Date when the pupil actually left the school: 22.4.41
*Date on which application for transfer certificate was made on behalf of the pupil by the parent or guardian: 20.6.41
*Date of transfer certificate: 20.6.41

It is my contention that Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate was incorrectly recorded on the Kamalapuram school record, which was transferred to Sathya Sai Baba's subsequent school at Bukkapatnam, and the incorrect birthdate was copied from it. Sanjay attempted to refute this contention by stating the following:

Ha ha ha ha ha ha, Moreno's argument is changing with the wind! Stop talking bullshit, Moreno, LOL! The earliest (English) record is the Kamalapuram transfer form, which has the same birthdate as the Bukkapatnam record. Whaddya know? The same birthdate occurs in the Uravakonda school records. And Moreno wants us to think that these records were copied from each other at a time when it was very difficult to travel by bullock cart, let alone by foot.

Since the earliest record is a transfer certificate, this record was required to be presented to the next school in order for the admission to occur. The information on the Bukkapatnam school record was copied from the Kamalapuram transfer certificate. Sanjay poorly attempted to argue that this was not the case because "it was very difficult to travel by bullock cart, let alone by foot". Nevertheless, the fact remains that the Kamalapuram transfer certificate was required as proof that Sathya Sai Baba passed his previous schooling and qualified for promotion to the Bukkapatnam school. How else was the Bukkapatnam school to ascertain whether or not Sathya Sai Baba passed his previous schooling? Therefore, contrary to Sanjay's claims, this record was shared between schools and information was copied from it.

BUKKAPATNAM SCHOOL RECORD DETAILS:
Return To Menu

Click Here For The Full Image (And Text Transcription) To The Bukkapatnam School Record

The Bukkapatnam school record is extremely important because it shows:

1. How poorly birthdates were recorded.


2. The apathy and lack of importance given to valid birthdates.


3. How early Indian school-records from rural villages are wholly unreliable means of ascertaining someone's birthday.

The LIMF image to the Bukkpatnam school record shows the names to the following 16 students who were admitted in July 1941:

1. 462 Gludappa 1-7-34 (7 years old)


2. 463 Adeppa 1-7-35 (6 years old)


3. 464 Gangappa 1-7-35 (6 years old)


4. 465 Ganganna 1-7-34 (7 years old)


5. 466 Sathyanarayana 4-10-29 (12 years old)


6. 467 Narayana Mulu 1-7-34 (7 years old)


7. 468 Venkatesh 1-7-33 (8 years old)


8. 469 Nanjuda Rao 1-7-34 (7 years old)


9. 470 Frakrodeem 1-7-35 (6 years old)


10. 471 Modeen Sab 1-7-26 (15 years old)


11. 472 Ranganna 1-1-30 (11 years old)


12. 473 Narayana Ganta 1-7-25 (16 years old)


13. 474 Venkataramulu 30-1-28 (13 years old)


14. 475 Mohammad Peer 1-7-35 (6 years old)


15. 476 Narayana


16. 477 Sallappa

Only 14 of these students have their birthdates showing. As one can clearly see, 11 out of the 14 students are listed as being born on exactly July 1st. This is wholly and completely improbable. These 11 students have different last names and different fathers (therefore, none of them are brothers, twins, triplets, etc.).

Out of these 11 students: Frakrodeem, Mohammad Peer, Adeppa and Gangappa were allegedly born on July 1st 1935. Gludappa, Ganganna, Narayana Mulu and Nanjuda Rao were allegedly born on July 1st 1934. Venkatesh was allegedly born on July 1st 1933, Modeen Sab was allegedly born on July 1st 1926 and Narayana Ganta was allegedly born on July 1st 1925.

These utterly improbable birthdates (defying lottery odds many times over) prove that the Bukkpatnam school record is inaccurate and did not record valid birthdates.

Looking at the ages, we also see that we have children and teenagers all in the same 8th standard class ranging between 6 - 16 years of age! This simply is not possible. There are four 6 year olds, four 7 year olds, one 8 year old, one 11 year old, one 12 year old, one 13 year old, one 15 year old and one 16 year old. Half the class (on this school-record page) was composed of 6 and 7 year olds.

Consequently, this Bukkapatnam school record does not provide proof to conclusively support any speculation that Sathya Sai Baba was born on October 4th 1929. The only proof that this school record provided is proof to the apathy and lack of concern for recording valid birthdates by Indian school officials in the late 1930's and early 1940's in rural villages in India. The Bukkapatnam school record solidifies the perception that Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate is just as unreliable as the other birthdates listed on the school record.

Funny enough, Sanjay said:

Due to the pre-Independence situation of not keeping records correctly, is it at all surprising that that ten students share the same birthdate with differing years? Who knows whether the families of the students were not in posession of the knowledge, or whether it was down to a lazy school clerk who just rubber-stamped the papers and put them in his outbox?

That's right:

**Who knows "whether it was down to a lazy school clerk who just rubber-stamped the papers and put them in his outbox" when it came to Sathya Sai Baba's alleged birthdate?

**Who knows if the "pre-independence situation of not keeping records correctly" would account for an inaccurate birthdate given to Sathya Sai Baba?

Sanjay just fully conceded to the inaccuracies and significant discrepancies in the Bukkapatnam school record! Nevertheless, Sanjay flip-flopped (as he often does) and argued that this very same flawed Bukkapatnam school record indisputably recorded Sathya Sai Baba's genuine birthdate! Sanjay's arguments are wholly absurd and contradictory.

Sanjay also tried to pull the wool over his reader's eyes by making the following comment about student 470, whose name is listed as "Fakrodeem Puttaparthi". "Puttaparthi" is not a last name, but a village name. Sanjay said:

Is it really that important if Frakrodeem's surname is 'Puttaparthi', the name of the village? Perhaps Frakodeem and/or his family wished to be known as in ancient times according to the land of their birth; 'Frakrodeem of Puttaparthi', as exists in classical literature.

Sanjay's response is utterly preposterous. As if resorting to a "classical literature" explanation from "ancient times" is not embarassing enough, Sanjay apparently overlooked the simple fact that Frakrodeem is not from Puttaparthi. He is from Bukkapatnam. Sathya Sai Baba is the only student listed from Puttaparthi on the Bukkapatnam school record. All the other students are from Bukkapatnam, without exception. If Frakrodeem is from Puttaparthi, then one is left to wonder why his village name is listed as Bukkapatnam. Either way, the entry is incorrect. So once again, why is Frakodeem's last name listed as "Puttaparthi" when Puttaparthi is not a last name but a village name? Why would an accurate and reliable school record make this glaring mistake and fail to correct it?

URAVAKONDA SCHOOL RECORD DETAILS:
Return To Menu

*Student Number: 422
*Name in full: R. Satyanarayana
*House or village name: Rathanaharam
*Parent: R.P. Venkappa
*Residence: Puttaparthi
*Ocupation of parent or guardian: Teacher
*Date of admission: 1-7-43
*Date of birth: 4-10-39 (October Thirty Nine)
*Religion: Hindu
*Caste: Rajapuri
*Class on admission: III F.

As one can see, the Uravakonda school record documented Sathya Sai Baba as being born on October 4th 1939 (and even spelled it out as "October Thirty nine"). This error was left in place for 33 years before an unknown person corrected it on August 11 1976, after comparing it to other school records.

The first correction reads:

Fourth October Nineteen Tweny Nine (signature unintelligible) 11-8-76 (August 11th 1976)

The second correction reads:

Compared with the original (unintelligible) register & date of birth corrected as 4.10.1929. (p. 32 of the register regs.) (signature unintelligible) 11-8-76 (August 11th 1976)

Despite the fact that the official Uravakonda school record documented Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate as being October 4th 1939 (and it stayed that way for 33 years), Sanjay had the audacity to state that the Uravakonda school record is an "independent piece of evidence that confirm Sathyanaraya Raju's birthdate as October 4th 1929"! Talk about denial, desperation and true-believer syndrome! The Uravakonda school record does not provide proof to conclusively support any speculation that Sathya Sai Baba was born on October 4th 1929. The only proof that the Uravakonda school record provided is a another contradictory date as to when Sathya Sai Baba was allegedly born.

VIJAYAMMA'S "ANYATHA SARANAM NASTHI" CITATION:
Return To Menu

The following quote was cited from Vijayamma's book to support a 1929 birthdate:

In 1945 the little girl's cousins were strolling in the affluent Bangalore suburb of Malleswaram when they heard bhajans being sung and entered the house to listen. Sai Baba, who was present there, invited them to go to Puttaparthi (whose name they had never heard). When they returned to their town of Kuppam (south-east of Bangalore, but in today's Andhra Pradesh), the cousins told the girl's mother about their meeting. The latter was keen for them all to go, but the idea was vetoed by the father, who said: 'You tell me He is sixteen years old and claims to be a reincarnation of Shirdi Sai. This is all humbug'. (p. 12)

This quote did not say anything about when Sathya Sai Baba was born. The quote indirectly implied that Sathya Sai Baba was sixteen years old in 1945. If this is true, Baba's year of birth would be 1929.

First of all, Vijayamma's notes were never written from a historical perspective. Although these stories were taken from Vijayamma's notes, the above story reads as if Vijayamma was repeating a story told to her in which she was not personally involved. Therefore, these quotes do not provide any proof that Sathya Sai Baba was born in 1929. There are other devotees who indirectly claim that Baba was born in 1926. Does this mean that one can conclusively state that the majority opinion is correct? Since when is one indirect quote from a devotee's book conclusive proof for a 1929 birthdate?

Furthermore, if Vijayamma honestly, reliably, accurately and objectively gave information that supported Sanjay's conclusions (as he contends), then this must mean that Vijayamma also honestly, reliably, accurately and objectively related first-hand miracles that she personally experienced with Sathya Sai Baba (which even included the alleged resurrection of her own father). Nevertheless, Sanjay adamantly refuses to accept the writing of Sai Devotees (who he often bashes and trashes as "liars" on the internet) and even stated about them:

...any amount of self-serving reasoning by Ganapati or other authors favourable to Sathya Sai needs to be taken with a pinch of salt...

Therefore, Sanjay's reference to "Anyatha Saranam Nasthi" (authored by a Sai Devotee "favorable to Sathya Sai") needs to be taken "with a pinch of salt".

Sanjay also said:

Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like.

Since Sanjay feels this way, his reference to Vijayamma's book cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because it talks about reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materializations and the like.

Of course, this is not the first time that Sanjay flip-flopped regarding books authored by Sai Devotees. Click Here To Read My Article About Sanjay's Acceptance Of LIMF (a book he later bashed and trashed as "bullshit").

BRIAN STEEL'S OBSERVATION:
Return To Menu

Brian Steel made the following observation:

As for the possible day of birth, in the school Register photostats in LIMF it is given as 4 October (1929). But maybe it WAS 23 November after all, as has been celebrated, at least since 1946 when we find the first reference in LIMF to an official birthday. It was also celebrated on 23 November in 1950, as Vijayakumari notes, with the Inauguration of Prasanthi Nilayam: "Till that day, prominence had not been given to Swami's Birthday. But that day we prayed to Swami to permit us to celebrate it" (Vijayakumari, p. 161) (In the Discourses recorded in Sathya Sai Speaks, the first to be labelled as a Birthday Discourse is the one for 1960.)

Therefore, Sathya Sai Baba's November 23rd birthday was known as far back as 1946 when he was 20 years old (if born in 1926) or 17 years old (if born in 1929). Furthermore, LIMF records a first-hand account where a fellow classmate of Sathyanarayana Raju (Sai Baba) stated that Sathya was one year senior to him in school (meaning Sathya would have been born in 1926). Read the following clarification from LIMF.

LIMF's (Love Is My Form) CLARIFICATIONS:
Return To Menu

On pages 68 & 69 the LIMF editors stated (about Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate):

"Sathya's date of birth in school records, however, is recorded as the 4th of October 1929 - and not the traditionally recognized date of the 23rd of November 1926. Talipineni Kesappa, son of Talipineni Ramappa maintains that Sathya was one year senior to him at school; therefore, Kesappa's date of birth being 11th of June 1927, Sathya's year of birth definitely is 1926. It has long been a practice in the schools to record a date of birth as being much later than the 'actual' date of birth - in order to facilitate career prospects. Sathya's parents wanted Sathya to become an educated officer. This, possibly could be the reason for the discrepancy. In addition, in 1926, people in remote villages like Puttaparthi, in pre-independent India, were not very particular about dates and birth registration was done much later."

Sanjay responded to LIMF's explanation by saying:

Plenty of other evidences have proved the 1929 birthdate. LIMF's 'reason' is bullshit, and they have made many more bullshit explanations, all of which have been discussed and dismissed in my exposé series. I personally do not care, it is a problem for devotees not for me. LOL.

Sanjay did not think LIMF was "bullshit" when he heavily relied and cited from it (admittedly) to make his pathetic "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" series (See my responses: 01 - 02 -03). I would also like to see the "plenty of other evidences" which prove the 1929 birthdate. For some mysterious reason, Sanjay can only cite 3 inaccurate school records and 1 statement from a book authored by a Sai Devotee. That's it! Where are the "plenty of other evidences" that come from neutral, non-devotee sources?

When Sanjay is trying to advance an argument against Sathya Sai Baba, he has no problem citing self-serving quotes from Sai Devotees that he considers reliable, accurate and objective. When it comes to other quotes made by these same Sai Devotees (that Sanjay considered worthy enough to reference before) Sanjay trashes and bashes them as "liars" and calls their explanations "bullshit". Sanjay is such a wishy-washy, hypocritical and duplicitous critic, one must take everything he says with a pinch of salt.

IN CONCLUSION:
Return To Menu

Since no one has been able to produce Sathya Sai Baba's original birth-certificate (or a copy to it), there is no conclusive proof as to which date or year he was actually born. Even though Sathya Sai Baba has a passport (from his visit to Africa in 1968, which would have required legitimate documentation for a date of birth), Sanjay said he would reject it because he claimed that someone in his family has an inaccurate date of birth in his/her passport. Therefore, Sanjay will accept nothing less than the original birth certificate to accept Sathya Sai Baba's birthdate as being November 23rd 1926 (and more than likely he would reject that as well).

Ironically enough, although Sanjay's standards are extremely rigid when it comes to a 1926 date of birth, his standards are extremely flaccid when it comes to a 1929 date of birth. Just more proof that Sanjay is a self-serving hypocrite who cannot take a rational, sober, fair or consistent stance against Sathya Sai Baba.

Although many Sai Devotees have written extensively about Sathya Sai Baba's early years, none of them ever mentioned that Baba changed his birthdate. Both Ganapathi and Kasturi had full access to Sathya Sai Baba's parents, relatives and old devotees. Based on their early interviews with Baba's parents, relatives and old devotees, it was ascertained that Baba was born on November 23rd 1926. Even LIMF was able to trace the earliest reference to Baba's November 23rd birthday back to 1946.

And to put the final nail in the coffin (to Sanjay's dead-in-the-water arguments) there are no government, official or reputable organizations, institutions, corporations, agencies or offices that accept school records as proof for one's date of birth. Not even one!

As a matter of fact, on the Littler Mendelson Legal Corporation website, there is definitive legal information regarding birth certificates and how school records cannot be substituted for them:

Birth, Marriage, Divorce Certificates: India:
Birth Certificates:
Birth Certificates are available to any applicant born after April 1, 1970, on payment of nominal fees to the appropriate government agency. Prior to 1970, however, reporting of births was voluntary. Therefore, if you are unable to obtain a birth certificate from the appropriate government agency or if the information on the birth certificate is insufficient, alternative documents may be submitted.

Two sworn affidavits executed by parents, siblings, aunts, or uncles (blood relatives) may be presented in lieu of a birth certificate when a birth certificate is not available. The affidavits should set forth the relationship between the deponent and the applicant, the date and place of the applicants’ birth, the names of both parents and other related facts. The affidavits must be witnessed and stamped by an advocate/notary. In addition, these affidavits must be accompanied by a document from a competent governmental authority stating that the certificate did not exist or no longer exists.

NOTE: School records and "birth records" issued by a hospital or church are insufficient substitutes for birth certificates. (Reference)

Consequently, Sanjay comical citations to school records as conclusive proof (supporting an October 4th 1929 date of birth for Sathya Sai Baba) is not only absurd, it is wholly without merit or legal substantiation.

Return To Top Menu

Sanjay Dadlani's Fake Identity

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

We do not know if Sanjay Kishore Dadlani is truly being forthcoming about his identity. After all, Sanjay uses numerous online names like:

1. gaurasundara


2. gaurasundaradas


3. gaurasundaradas dasanu das


4. gaurasundara_108


5. gaurasundaradas_108


6. gaurasundaradas108


7. Guru Meditation


8. Demon Guru


9. saiexposed420


10. dark_knight_9


11. Dark Knight


12. dark_knight_216


13. killuminati


14. killuminati108


15. X Zecutioner


16. Vaishnava_das108


17. donmakaveli22


18. sai-charan.geo


19. innitball


20. Dual Vision


21. Gaura


22. Gour Govinda Katha


23. saiexpose


24. Sarf


25. dark_knite_9


26. Groove Control


27. x_zecutor


28. punisher_108


29. Azra`iL


30. Groove


31. His Holiness Swami Saiexposedananda


32. sbexposed


33. H.H. Swami Saiexposedananda


34. Sai Baba EXPOSED


35. Jay


36. Kishore Dadlani


37. D. Jay


38. Kishore


39. SD


40. Sanjay Kishore Dadlani

And quite possibly (Ref):

1. nationalenquirersaibabaedition


2. Roving Reporter

Furthermore, Sanjay does not provide his full real name, full address or full phone number on any of his blogs, articles or comments. This must mean (using the logic employed against me by Anti-Sai Activists) that Sanjay is not who he claims he is and is using a fake identity.

Too bad Sanjay cannot live up to the same standards he and Anti-Sai Activists use against me. Therefore, Anti-Sai Activists themselves have made the case that Sanjay is using a fake identity and is not who he claims he is.

AbusedFor15Years / UsedByBaba Lies

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Since mid-May of 2006, an anonymous and faceless person using the names "abusedfor15years" and "usedbybaba" (whom appears to have used the past names "ex-sai student", "X-S", "saibabagod", "sriram", "sebastian", "ravi saluja", "Another Ex Student", "hariharan", "lenin999", "victimofsaileela", "saurabh", "abhin", "blldexter" and many others) made numerous defamatory and criminal allegations against Sathya Sai Baba on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group & QuickTopic.

Needless to say, Sanjay immediately took to "usedbybaba" and engaged him in conversation, never expressing any sort of healthy skepticism or asking for any kind of proof, evidence, documents or data to support the erroneous and criminal allegations "usedbybaba" made against Sathya Sai Baba.

Fortunately, "usedbybaba" self-imploded and fully exposed himself (which Anti-Sai Activists tend to do when mildly provoked). The following posts reveal what kind of person "abusedfor15years" / "usedbybaba" truly is ("linga", in the following posts, means "penis"):

who is premanand? by the way watch your language u fu***king third rate ar88hole. you must have slept with all the guys and maybe forgot who among these is premanand. u must have molested your brother or father and blamed them for this Don't try to tell me i am a pervert Maybe you got fu''d by BaBA. I can write worse than this and i am capable of doing more, u shit pot.Nothing except shit comes out of your mouth. Maybe you eat through your bottom. You can"t keep calling me names and expect me to take it lying. You bi''**h Who the fuck are you to forgive me you lingam sucking swine. tell me where you are or when you come to india i will pesonally meet you if you have the guts.bitch.Did ur boy friend fu**k u in thr mouth. If i come to know who you are belive me i will get you. I remember people for life and don't take me for granted. BAS****D" (Reference).

sob sob sob sob sob. If you like the taste of linga how can you object to some one "molesting " you. Go and taste baba's linga . or rathnakar maybe.it is free. They told me he is divorced. Is it true? if it is true you can get married to him. try him he is only in his thirties unlike BaBa the Avatar who broke his leg who is in his seventies uh eighties oh no nineties. umm i dont know .maybe he will adjust it when he knows he is going to die to suit the stories that he told. by the way baba keeps telling the boys sbout the third leg. we know of Siva's third eye what is the third leg.ofcourse it is cock u dummy (Reference).

Why can"t you sleep with me. maybe you have a pole insted of a hole. wow baba will enjoy it. By the way what are you professionaly , oh i forgot that you belong to the oldest profession. Hooker (Reference).

And on QuickTopic:

lenin999@yahoo.co.uk: you think the so called devotees will allow anyone to invetigate. NO, THEY WILL KILL HIM. Osama must be jelous of baba for having such wonderful (killers) devotees

Om Sai: lisa de bitch y dont u shut the fuck up u silly lallupanju whore

Hariharan: IT WAS BIT DIFFICULT PIERCING HIM SO HE WOULD JUST SUCK FOR ME I also loved inserting my penis behind baba as he liked it and though he could not take it in fully. But i am also hiv positive

Anand Krishnamurhti: Angel you fucking ass hole can park yourself in London or wherever you live.pattinda mounay. nyan malyalai yanum. all the three of you are phedophiles.angel,joe, lisa are all 3 dogs..Behan chooth Angel,baath math kar. You Idiot, cheddi, you don't know cheddi. The thing that you were inside you pant is cheddi -under wear.ullu ka patte, nyan bangalorilindu smarikinnu.patti,patti

It is significant to point out that the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning in Prashanti Nilayam is the only college in India to have received an "A++" rating by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (an autonomous body established by the University Grants Commission: Reference). For further proof, one can also read the Draft Report of the Peer Team on Institutional Accreditation of the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning (Deemed University) Vidyagiri, Prashanthi Nilayam – 515 134 (A.P) Visit Dates: December 2 – 4, 2002 (Reference: DOC File).

This is the esteemed University that "abusedfor15years" / "usedbybaba" claimed he attended. Those who have visited Sathya Sai Baba's ashram know full well that his students speak flawless English and are reputed as some of the brightest in all of India (even receiving national awards from the President of India).

All it takes is one look at the atrocious English grammar and spelling used by "abusedfor15years" / "usedbybaba" to know that he never attended Sathya Sai Baba's prestigious University.

Funny enough "abusedfor15years" / "usedbybaba" pretended to be another student using the name of "blldexter". He accidentally posted under this name and tried to erase it later but his post was already sent to email subscribers, of which I am one. "usedbybaba" said about Baba's age, "BaBa the Avatar who broke his leg who is in his seventies uh eighties oh no nineties. umm i dont know". If "usedbybaba" was really a student for 15 years, why doesn't he know Baba's age? "usedbybaba" has no clue if Baba is in his 70's, 80's or 90's.

These are the anonymous, faceless and mentally disturbed defamers who spread their lies on the internet against Sathya Sai Baba. The tide has turned and the only people who are being "exposed" are Anti-Sai Activists themselves.

What Alan Kazlev Thought About Sanjay Dadlani

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

In the past few months, Alan Kazlev had been talking trash behind my back with Sanjay Dadlani calling me (as Sanjay put it), "a slimy character". Kazlev attempted to clarify by saying he couldn't quite recall using that particular phrase but confessed he did use the phrase "obsessive nit-picking attitude". Funny enough (in a past email) Kazlev spoke trash behind the backs of Reinier Van Der Sandt and Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Exposed") and said:

"is it Reinier using your name? i tell you, glancing through those yahoo posts, it seems like this guy and his buddy Sai Exposed are a bunch of adolescent fuckheads"

Kazlev also had the following to say about Reinier:

"yep, he is one sick character alright... (the more one reads on all this, the dirtier one feels...ughh! Like swimming in a sewer)...i have to admit, the more i look into this guy the less i like him"

That's right. Kazlev called both Reinier and Sanjay "adolescent fuckheads"! Now, however, Kazlev is kissing their feet and has nothing but praise for them. Sounds like someone may be schizophrenic. Hmm. There's a thought.

Nice new friend you have there, Sanjay.

Successor Of Sai Baba?

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

SUCCESSOR OF SAI BABA?

Strange enough, in Sanjay's "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies", he completely ignored the first-hand account of Pedda Bottu. The following story was taken from "Sathya Sai – The Avatar of Love", Page: 14 –16. Published By Sri Prasanthi Society, Hyderabad, under the auspices of Sri Sathya Sai Seva Organisations, Andhra Pradesh on the occasion of Baba's 67th Birthday, 1992.

The Same Baba: Shirdi Sai and Sathya Sai
The Assurance and the Fulfillment
How Baba had prophesied His advent to Smt. Sharada Devi.

Smt. Sharada Devi (affectionately called as 'Pedda Bottu' by Baba) is one of those few privileged souls who had the unique chance of being in the proximity of both Shirdi Sai and Sathya Sai. Here she narrates how Shirdi Baba had revealed to her about His future Advent and how later Sathya Sai blessed her profusely:

One day I requested Baba (Shirdi Sai) to give me Mantra Upadesh (spiritual initiation). Baba replied, "You are young yet. I will give you Upadesh when you grow older".

I waited till I was 29 years old and prayed to Baba again. He shouted at me in anger: "You are always obsessed with Upadesh" and kicked me on the chest with his right foot.

With tears of dejection streaming down my face, I went out and lay beneath a tree. I must have slept after weeping for a long time. It must have been very late in the night when Baba came to wake me up. He asked me to follow him to Lendi Garden.

When we reached the Garden, He said "My child, I could not sleep in Dwaraka Mayi (the dilapidated Masjid, and Baba's dwelling) when you were lying out there without food since morning. I have brought you here, for, I want to tell you something, but first you must eat."

He stretched out His right hand with palm up and said "Allah Malik hai". (God is the master). Two chapatis (wheat pancakes) and a lemon sized-kova (soft solid sweet made of milk) materialised in His palm. He gave them to me to eat. Again He stretched out His hand and this time a very small mud pot full of water materialised. When I ate and drank, he asked me: "Gori, Is your anger gone?" (Baba used to affectionately call Sharada Devi, 'Gori')

I replied in all humility "There is no anger or frustration now. I was a fool not to realise that your kick was in fact a sign of your Grace."

Baba then told me "I will tell you something, but before that you should hold My feet and promise Me not to tell this to anyone".

With pounding heart and anticipating the much awaited Mantra-Upadesh I did as he told me, "Gori, I will appear in Andhra with the same name of Sai Baba but in another Avatar (divine manifestation). Then again you will come to me. I will keep you with me and will give you joy".

I was ecstatic in joy and said "I am blessed, my Lord. This is my greatest fortune." This conversation between us took place in 1917 AD. Later, I was informed that my ailing elder aunt wanted to see me at Rajamundry. It was when I was at Rajamundry in 1918 that I learnt that Baba had left His physical body. I was filled with inexplicable anguish.

One day, many years later, I was invited to sing a 'Hari Katha' (a form of ballad popular in rural areas of Andhra Pradesh) in a village called Uravakonda. In the house where this event was arranged, I happened to see on the wall a photograph of a handsome lad. He had a large crown of hair. The face and eyes were most charming and magnetic.

I asked the housewife whose photo it was. She told me "Don't you know? He is Puttaparthi Sai Baba. If you want to see him, I can take you to him tomorrow".

The next day I was taken to the house of one Mr. Seshama Raju, the elder brother of Baba. I then saw the young 14-year-old Baba. It was in 1940; I was then fifty-two years old. The first words that Bhagwan Sri Sathya Sai Baba uttered were: "Gori, you owe me sixteen rupees from my Shirdi Incarnation".

I replied that I had already paid up all my debts to Shirdi Baba. He said, "I know. I said it because you are not able to recognise Me. All right. After completing all your tasks at the Poor Home you are running, go over to Puttaparthi. I shall retain you with Me and shall bestow all the joy you want".

For the next seventeen years, I used to visit Puttaparthi frequently and spend a few months every time in the divine presence of Baba. In 1958, when I was 70, I closed down the Poor Home and went over to Puttaparthi to spend the rest of my life there.

Of course, when it comes to this first-hand account relating to the successor of Sai Baba, Sanjay casually dismissed it because no one else can confirm it. Nevertheless, when it comes to unsubstantiated, anonymous and second-hand stories against Sathya Sai Baba, Sanjay not only believes them, he disseminates them as the truth.

Related Blogs - Exposing The Exposers

Related Blogs Exposing The Exposers:

• Robert Priddy Exposed


• Dadlani References


• Pub Avatar


• Tony O'Clery Exposed


• Om Sathya Sai Baba


• M. Alan Kazlev Exposed

Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

I would like to preface this article with two quotes from Sanjay. The importance and relevance of these quotes cannot be underestimated and wholly compromise Sanjay's lamentable, wishy-washy and contradictory arguments:

...any amount of self-serving reasoning by Ganapati or other authors favourable to Sathya Sai needs to be taken with a pinch of salt...

Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like.

Sanjay poorly supported his arguments in his "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" series by citing the following references:

REFERENCE ONE:
Citations From: Narayana Kasturi
Source(s): Sathyam Shivam Sundaram; Easwaramma - The Chosen Mother
Sanjay's Position: REJECTED: On the QuickTopic Forum, Sanjay repeatedly claimed that Kasturi "couldn't even get one fact right", had "poor research skills" and indulged in "poorly-researched fairy stories that are self-contradictory".

REFERENCE TWO:
Citations From: Ra. Ganapathi
Source(s): Baba: Sathya Sai
Sanjay's Position: REJECTED: Sanjay said, about Ganapathi's commentaries, "this is a very obtuse, tangled and unsatisfactory explanation for why it is possible for the powerful spirit of Shirdi Sai Baba to take possession of the young Raju and continue his works through him", "any amount of self-serving reasoning by Ganapati or other authors favourable to Sathya Sai needs to be taken with a pinch of salt" and "there is very little evidence that Ganapati performed any independent research except for that which serves the cause of propagating the name of Sathya Sai".

REFERENCE THREE:
Citations From: Various Sai Devotees and Sai Relatives
Source(s): LIMF (Love Is My Form) Volume 1
Sanjay's Position: ACCEPTED: Read My Article About Sanjay's Amusing Acceptance Of LIMF despite the fact that LIMF heavily relied on (and frequently cited) the works of Ganapathi and Kasturi, both of whom Sanjay rejected as unreliable (what does that make LIMF?). Sanjay also accepted LIMF despite claiming "...any amount of self-serving reasoning by Ganapati or other authors favourable to Sathya Sai needs to be taken with a pinch of salt...Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like." LIMF was authored by Sai Devotees who held/hold wholly favorable views on Sathya Sai Baba. Then why did Sanjay cite a "self serving" book written by authors "favorable to Sathya Sai"? Why would Sanjay cite LIMF when it cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because it talks about reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materializations and the like? Sanjay cherry picks his criticisms and cites entirely self-serving quotes as reliable, while dismissing everything else as unreliable.

REFERENCE FOUR:
Citations From: Dr. Satya Pal Ruhela
Source(s): Sai Baba And His Message
Sanjay's Position: ACCEPTED: This is an amusing reference that Sanjay accepted about a man from Hyderabad named "Naranayana Baba" who is a trance medium who claimed that the disembodied soul of Shirdi Sai Baba not only talks to him, but that Sai Baba also puts items into his closed hand that instantly materialize when he opens his fist! Because this trance medium is allegedly in contact with Sai Baba's "disembodied soul", Sanjay used this reference to support his argument that Shirdi Sai Baba did not reincarnate as Sathya Sai Baba! Sanjay said, "...any amount of self-serving reasoning by Ganapati or other authors favourable to Sathya Sai needs to be taken with a pinch of salt...Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like." Then why did Sanjay cite a "self serving" book written by an author "favorable to Sathya Sai"? Why would Sanjay cite a book that cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because it talks about reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materializations and the like (including trance mediumship)? What gullible and naive audience is Sanjay attempting to address?

REFERENCE FIVE:
Citations From: His Holiness B.V. Narasimha Swamiji
Source(s): Life Of Sai Baba; Sri Sai Baba's Charters & Sayings
Sanjay's Position: ACCEPTED: His Holiness B.V. Narasimha Swamiji (henceforth referred to as "Narasimha") is an ardent devotee of Shirdi Sai Baba who considers him to be God (literally). Narasimha Swami said:

My hunger for spiritual food was not satisfied, till I came to Shirdi. At Shirdi, I was given more than I could lake. I had at last discovered my Sadguru. He is Samartha Sadguru and I live in constant communion with him...

But these have occasionally been mentioned in the columns of the 'Sai Sudha' or other papers and invariably on investigation, it has been noted that any person, claiming to be Sai Baba, does not show even a very small fraction of Baba's nature. Mere power to read thought, mere clairvoyance, mere production of articles from empty box and hands and mere devotion to Sai or God, will not constitute one into an Avatar of Sai. So, we might conclude this chapter by saying that Sai left no successor to his seat, that there was no seat to succeed to, (as God's seat can never be vacant) and that there is no person living who can be recognised by all as having the entire Sai spirit or Soul in his body, that is, who can be regarded as the Avatar of Sai...

Therefore the question of our finding any person now who is the Avatar of Baba need not be further discussed. It is sufficient to say that those who are anxious to benefit by Sai Baba will be very wise if they confine themselves to the well known history of Sai Baba; and if they adopt the usual and well known methods for contacting Sai Baba of Shirdi, who is now no other than God himself, they would succeed, and they need not be panting to discover if there is any Avatar of Sai Baba or anyone who is entitled to call himself the successor of Sai Baba for the Shirdi Gadi. God's seat we repeat is never vacant. Sai Baba was and is God always immersed in the God idea, and carrying out God's lilas when he was in the flesh. His Ritambhara Prajna or Antarjnana, as it was called, his control over men's minds and material objects at any distance, his power to appear and do anything anywhere, can only be called divine. These powers we read of in his lilas before 1918, and we read of the same also after 1918...

Because Narasimha voiced the opinion that there are no successors to Shirdi Sai Baba, Sanjay immediately cited Narasimha as an authority and stated, "We couldn't have put it better." Nevertheless, one is left to wonder why Sanjay would cite and agree with Narasimha when Sanjay does not believe anything (except self-serving quotes) that Narasimha has to say? For starters, Sanjay is a Hare Krishna Congregational Member who does not accept or believe that Shirdi Sai Baba is God. Since Narasimha's comments and arguments are derived soley from his perception of Sai Baba's Godhood, why would Sanjay cite and agree with Narasimha? As a matter of fact, Sanjay said, on Google Groups (using the name "SANJAY DADLANI" and "Dark Knight"):

Shirdi Sai Baba can go to hell (View Thread or View Single Post)

If you knew the amount of damage that this "religious teacher" has caused to so many lives, you may understand the curse. DK (View Thread or View Single Post)

Sanjay's reference to Narasimha is deflated. Sanjay does not believe or accept anything that Narasimha has to say except his comments about Shirdi Sai Baba having no successor. That's it. It is exactly this type of self-serving hypocrisy that thoroughly compromises all of Sanjay's arguments and critiques.

Furthermore, why would Sanjay cite Narasimha's books when they cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because they talk about reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materializations and the like (including Sai Baba's alleged ability to control other's minds, create objects at any distance and his power to appear and do anything anywhere)?

REFERENCE SIX:
Citations From: V. & Shakuntala Balu
Source(s): Divine Glory
Sanjay's Position: ACCEPTED: Once again, why did Sanjay cite a "self serving" book written by authors "favorable to Sathya Sai"? Why would Sanjay cite a book that cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because it talks about reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materializations and the like (including bilocation, psychic phenomena and healings)?

IN CONCLUSION:
All (without exception) of Sanjay's references are wholly compromised by his contradictory statements and personal beliefs. Sanjay's arguments against Sathya Sai Baba are one huge farce.

Sanjay cannot cite any reputable, reliable or neutral sources to formulate his flimsy contentions against Sathya Sai Baba. Sanjay exclusively relies on the books & publications of both Shirdi and Sathya Sai Devotees. Sanjay argued that one must take the "self serving reasoning" of "authors favorable to Sathya Sai" with a "pinch of salt". Strange enough, ALL of Sanjay's references (except one reference from a Shirdi Sai Devotee who believes Sai Baba is God) is taken from "authors favorable to Sathya Sai" whose "self serving reasoning" must be taken with a "pinch of salt". Sanjay refuted his own references from his own mouth.

Not only did Sanjay cite "authors favorable to Sathya Sai" whose "self serving reasoning" must be taken with a "pinch of salt", he also claimed:

Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like.

As stated before, Sanjay is a Hare Krishna Congregational Member who fully believes in the divine authority of the Srimad Bhagavatam that promotes belief in: A geocentric universe, reincarnation, demons, black magic, ghosts, hobgoblins, miracles, manifestatations, shape-shifters, the Sun being closer to the Earth than the Moon, a demon's head floating in outer space as the cause of eclipses, the Sun being the only star in the universe and all other twinkling stars are similar to the Moon, the Himalayas are 80,000 miles high (they are actually 4.92 miles high), the diameter of the Earth is 807,780 miles (it is actually 7,800 miles), the entire universe ends just prior to Pluto, Lord Krishna literally manifested 16,000 human forms, married 16,000 women and procreated with each one of them and many other simply unbelievable stories (Refs: 01 - 02)!

According to Sanjay, he, his Hare Krishna Gurus (Srila Prahbupada & Srila Gour Govinda Swami) and billions of Christians, Hindus, Gaudiya Vaishanvas and Buddhists are not "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because they believe in either miracles, manifestations, reincarnation, possessions and the like!

According to Sanjay, scriptures like the Bible, Koran, Vedas, Puranas, Mahabharata, Bhagavad Gita, Srimad Bhagavatam, Upanishads, Ramayana, Dhammapada, Tanakh, Talmud, Kabbalah and others cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because these scriptures discuss and promote belief in either miracles, manifestations, reincarnation, possessions and the like!

Sanjay has effectively disgraced himself, his belief system, his Gurus and his God concept. The hypocrite extraordinaire has succeeded only in revealing his duplicity, self-serving agenda and hypocrisy. No one can believe a fully exposed pervert, Jesus & Boot sex fetishist, self-professed drunk and pathological liar. Enough said.

RELATED BLOG LINKS: » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1 » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2 » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3 (you are here)

Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

The primary source that Sanjay used (admittedly) to advance the argument that Sathya Sai Baba was aware of Shirdi Sai Baba in his early childhood (before claiming to be his reincarnation) is the Love Is My Form book, Volume 1, by Dr. R. S. Padmanabhan, ISBN: 8186822771.

For starters, Dr. Ranganathan Padmanabhan (also spelled "Padmanaban") is a long-time and ardent devotee of Sathya Sai Baba (SSB). Padmanabhan considers SSB to be God Incarnate and has openly declared this in person, in writing and in LIMF. He also published the book "Sri Sathya Sai Baba Life Story for Children". Padmanabhan's introductory note in LIMF Can Be Viewed Here. A miraculous experience that Padmanabhan attributed to Sathya Sai Baba Can Be Viewed Here.

LIMF is a hagiography that documents the incredible and amazing miraculous events that dominated the landscape in the first 25 years of the Sathya Sai Avatar. In LIMF, numerous accounts of early followers and relatives are related that all share the common themes of miracles, manifestations, on-the-spot requested materializations, visions, dreams, experiences, cures, healings, operations, levitations, bilocations and other astounding paranormal phenomena.

LIMF is the same book that Sanjay used as an authority to support his argument that the young Sathyanaranaya was aware of Shirdi Sai Baba in his early childhood (before making the proclaimation that he was a reincarnation of the famous Maharashtran saint, Sai Baba). If all the quotes (taken from LIMF) about the Shirdi Sai Baba controversy were to be compiled together, it would not amount to more than one page. That's it. However, since Sanjay thinks that LIMF is a reputable and reliable source to formulate his arguments with, he is thereby directly advocating for the integrity, honesty, objectivity and reliability of the contents in the book!

Read the article that appeared in The Hindu about the Love Is My Form (LIMF) book. Keep in mind that this is the same book that Sanjay extensively cited from and considered to be an reputable and reliable source on the Sathya/Shirdi Sai Baba imbroglio:

A Living Phenomenon: July 31st 2001

LOVE IS MY FORM Volume I (The Advent) - Documented Biography of Sri Sathya Sai Baba: R. Padmanaban - Editor; Sai Towers Publishing, 23/1142, Vijayalakshmi Colony, Kadugodi, Bangalore- 560067. Rs. 2,500.

THIS, THE first volume of a uniquely definitive biography of Sri Sathya Sai Baba, covers the first 25 years (1926-1950) of his life. The plan is said to be to follow the story with five more volumes (already in preparation) stretching the account to the year 2000 A.D. Each of these volumes would cover only a decade of his life. In this well- documented edition, the authenticity of each event reported is testified to by actual witness, whom the editor has chased to wherever they may be living at present. This extreme degree of authentication would, even if not required by devotees or general readers, satisfy the suspecting skepticists, regarding their credibility. Such a highly objective and fully attested biography is indeed necessary to convince posterity that once such a transcendent figure walked on earth in this period of history, that he defied a definition except perhaps as an incarnation of God. This is a Hindu concept, of course.

The book opens with an introduction by Dr. R. S. Padmanabhan, who has since become a long-time devotee of Baba. He had an occasion, as a fresh dental graduate, to sit in a Bhajan session of Baba in Bangalore in 1944; Baba, 18 years old at that time, materialised Vibhooti, blessed the youth and said he would get married in February 1945. To the demurring dentist, Baba said that it would surely occur and he would come and bless him. He had, in the same period, told the prospective bride elsewhere in a similar vein; she was just 15 years old. The partners had not known each other and the marriage did occur in February 1945.

Such mysterious phenomena abound in page after page throughout. There have, of course, been quite a few books on Baba, some having been noticed in these columns by the present reviewer. There are also masterly biographies by Ra. Ganapathy and by N. Kasthuri, which are frequently cited in this book. But this present edition is the first systematic chronology, recording events almost as a day-to-day diary.

As a very young boy Raju (as Baba was then known) told the neighbour, Karnam Kamalamma, an astounding truth: "You think I am a human being? No, I am God. I am Easwara himself. You will see my glory in the coming years. Believe me!" From then on, all events that unfolded every day, have only confirmed the veracity of that self-assessment. While at school, he used to materialise Vibhooti, Lingams, photographs of Shirdi Sai Baba and other items. On October 21, 1943, he made a declaration that has since become history: "I am Shirdi Sai Baba in a new life." Almost the next day, an old lady, a daughter of a district collector in the then Nizam Domain, came in. Raju greeted her with an astounding remark: "My child, you have arrived at last!" She had been a regular visitor to Shirdi; having lost all her four sons, she had once prayed to Shirdi Sai Baba to grant her relief from the pains of worldly life, to which he had replied (before his samadhi that occurred in 1917): "I will be born in Andhra and you will stay with me forever!" This he had told the lady on her oath that she would not divulge it till the time came.

Even when he was at school, he had once dumbfounded an angry teacher who was to give a cane-lash at his palm, because the teacher saw Shirdi Sai Baba's picture on it. A classmate who had offended him by throwing stones was denied food in the hostel. In the next Thursday Bhajan session, Raju called for Abdul Khader standing somewhere unseen in the rear-end of the queue. He asked him: "You came to plead for Hanumanth Rao! It was I who made the headmaster punish the wrong-doer. Now you can tell the headmaster to resume feeding him!" To this classmate's query (in 1944) as to when India was likely to achieve independence, Baba had answered "The 15th of August, 1947". We should remember that neither leaders nor the foreign rulers had any notion not to speak of an agreement about this date.

In January 1948, when Baba was supervising the Mandir construction at Puttaparthi, on one evening, he became uneasy, went into a room and shut himself. When he came out at 7-30 p.m. he announced to the people around: "A great soul has passed away!" The village people in those days could know the news, only a day later, from TheHindu that Mahatma Gandhi had been shot dead. So also he had a peculiar vision and experience on 14th April, 1950 when Ramana Maharshi attained Samadhi.

The events narrated belong to class of "Leelas" of Lord Krishna, especially as Balakrishna. A few are worth mentioning: when the car of the I.G. of Police, in which Baba was travelling got exhausted of petrol, he made it run on water. While at Karur, he forbade a cameraman to take a snap; when it was not heeded, the film roll coolly slipped into Baba's hands over a long distance. He once brought Ganga floods into the Mandir for all to see and worship. He could often arrange to feed any number of unexpected guests when there were only empty utensils (reminiscent of the Akshaya-Patra episode of the Mahabharata). Reports of his performing surgery on patients (R., T. and others, names omitted herein) without an operation theatre and anaesthesia are vividly presented, convincingly to the non- believer too. An atheist driver was reminded of his accident in the kitchen when he was eight years old; he was told where the boiling oil had caused an injury and left a permanent scar. The stupefied driver fell on all fours, when he was handed over a driving licence of that date with Baba's photo affixed!

Even at school, he has once given a full-time dance performance without any formal training at that, when the lady artiste fixed had failed to arrive. He enjoyed singing, in tandem, with a famous Chennai vocal duo, many compositions of Thyagaraja. He could invariably read anybody's thoughts as God alone can. Once he performed a transcorporeal journey (22- 10-1946); his body was in Mysore; but as a cobra, he witnessed the Deepavali celebration in Puttaparthi. Nevertheless he would not grant everybody every wish of his. For example, he once declined to help a badly handicapped child recover normalcy, saying; "It is by past Karmas; if cured, he will suffer in the next life".

Some 17 rulers of princely states met him on the 29th September, 1947 to seek his godly intervention for retaining rulership against Sardar Patel's edict. He merely said: "It will all happen as time goes by!" But hours later when a grand feast was to be had in their honour, the princes were asked to serve the commonality, the devotees and the like. As it was going on, Baba said with a winsome, even mischievous, smile, "Times have changed!"

The successive volumes will speak of his welfare projects, but his "Leelas" (that is perhaps the correct description) will continue to enliven, educate and elevate the devotees. The volume is printed in superior art paper; it is heavy, materially and spiritually; over 950 photographs and 10 pages of index are provided. There is practically no typographical error. One would, however, suggest that a usage such as "the devotees performed Padanamaskar to Baba" would be a happier form than the one used at present (that is, "the devotee took Padanamaskar"). Also, the Thyagaraja composition in the list on p. 429 should spell as "Broche- varevare". It is in Sriranjani raga.A book that would prove a treat and treasure to every Sai Bhakta, it is also useful to historians, parapsychologists, spiritual seekers and the layman.

V. N. VEDANTA DESIKAN (Reference)

Therefore, the primary souce that Sanjay cited against Sathya Sai Baba is taken from a hagiography written by a Sai Devotee. Since Sanjay thinks that LIMF is objective, reliable and honest enough to cite against Sathya Sai Baba, then LIMF must also be objective, reliable and honest enough to cite in favor of Sathya Sai Baba's astounding paranormal and psychic abilities. Needless to say, Sanjay believes that Sathya Sai Baba is a fraud and that Sai Devotees are liars. Consequently, Sanjay's reference to LIMF actually contradicts his position.

As a matter of fact, on the QuickTopic forum, Sanjay explicitly called SSB's sister, Venkamma, a "liar". Sanjay said (original emphasis used):

I can do anything I want since I am dealing with a bunch of confirmed liars. :-) Raju is a lair and Venkamma is a liar too.

Since Sanjay just conceded that Venkamma is a "liar", then one is left to wonder why Sanjay cited her as an authority (using LIMF) on what really happened to Sathya Sai Baba? If Sai devotees and relatives are liars, then where is Sanjay getting his accurate & truthful information from? According to Sanjay, none of these devotees and relatives are trustworthy. Therefore, all these citations from LIMF are useless in revealing objective truth because there are no non-devotee biographies written about Sathya Sai Baba. Sanjay's citations from LIMF are thereby wholly and irreparably compromised. Sanjay must rely exclusively on the words, books and testimonies of Sai Devotees he ceaselessly bashes and trashes on the internet.

Furthermore, LIMF heavily depends on and frequently cites the biographical works of Ra. Ganapathy and Narayana Kasturi. Strangely enough, Sanjay flatly rejects the works and commentaries of Ganapathy and Kasturi, thereby rejecting a majority of LIMF! As a matter of fact, Sanjay repeatedly claimed that Kasturi "couldn't even get one fact right", had "poor research skills" and indulged in "poorly-researched fairy stories that are self-contradictory". Needless to say, Sanjay cannot tell us who got the facts right about SSB. The only people Sanjay cited against Kasturi were other Sai devotees who he claims are untruthworthy and "liars" as well. As a matter of fact, Sanjay attempted to refute Kasturi and said (emphasis added by me):

The real truth is very different. Raju's elder sister, Venkamma, left behind her unpublished diaries where she had described all of these incidents and which were consulted during the research phase for LIMF.

Yes, this "Venkamma" is the same Venkamma discussed earlier that Sanjay called a "liar". According to Sanjay, the "real truth" comes from a "liar".

Sanjay (the hypocrite extraordinaire) even had the audacity to say:

Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like.

Needless to say, Sanjay is a Hare Krishna Congregational Member who fully believes in the divine authority of the Srimad Bhagavatam that promotes belief in: A geocentric universe, reincarnation, demons, black magic, ghosts, hobgoblins, miracles, manifestatations, shape-shifters, the Sun being closer to the Earth than the Moon, a demon's head floating in outer space as the cause of eclipses, the Sun being the only star in the universe and all other twinkling stars are similar to the Moon, the Himalayas are 80,000 miles high (they are actually 4.92 miles high), the diameter of the Earth is 807,780 miles (it is actually 7,800 miles), the entire universe ends just prior to Pluto, Lord Krishna literally manifested 16,000 human forms, married 16,000 women and procreated with each one of them and many other simply unbelievable stories (Refs: 01 - 02)!

According to Sanjay, he, his Hare Krishna Gurus (Srila Prahbupada & Srila Gour Govinda Swami) and billions of Christians, Hindus, Gaudiya Vaishanvas and Buddhists are not "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because they believe in either miracles, manifestations, reincarnation, possessions and the like!

According to Sanjay, scriptures like the Bible, Koran, Vedas, Puranas, Mahabharata, Bhagavad Gita, Srimad Bhagavatam, Upanishads, Ramayana, Dhammapada, Tanakh, Talmud, Kabbalah and others cannot be believed by "sensible", "rational", "logical" or "down-to-earth" people because these scriptures discuss and promote belief in either miracles, manifestations, reincarnation, possessions and the like!

It is also amusing to point out that Sanjay cited passages from LIMF (which promotes belief in and documents testimonies about miracles, manifestations and reincarnation) as a reputable and reliable source against Sathya Sai Baba! Sanjay contradicts himself so often, it is of little wonder that no one takes him seriously.

In Conclusion:
Sanjay said:

...any amount of self-serving reasoning by Ganapati or other authors favourable to Sathya Sai needs to be taken with a pinch of salt...

Since LIMF was authored by Sai Devotees who advanced their wholly favorable views on Sathya Sai Baba, Sanjay needs to practice what he preaches and take the comments in LIMF "with a grain of salt".

In my next blogged article, I will comment on the other references that Sanjay cited (regarding the Sathya/Shirdi Sai Baba controversy) and his utterly ludicrous reasoning and illogic.

Update: October 29th 2006:
Just recently, Sanjay had the following to say about LIMF:

LIMF's 'reason' is bullshit, and they have made many more bullshit explanations, all of which have been discussed and dismissed in my exposé series. I personally do not care, it is a problem for devotees not for me. LOL.

Therefore, Sanjay just refuted, out of his own mouth, the primary reference for his "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" articles as being "bullshit". Need I say more?

RELATED BLOG LINKS: » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1 » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2 (you are here) » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3

Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Anti-Sai Activists (including Sanjay) love to create controversy about Shirdi & Sathya Sai Baba and cite dates, events and personal testimonies taken from books and publications by Sai Devotees. Here is "my take" regarding all these "controversial" issues:

Anti-Sai Activists (including Sanjay) ceaselessly and unremittingly accuse Sai devotees of being:

cult members, brainwashed, unreliable, idiotic, dishonest, deceitful, subjective, inaccurate, biased, minions, ignorant, repressed, prejudiced, projectors, exaggerators, escapists, weak in intellect, easily influenced, highly impressionable, in self-denial, irrational, illogical, embellishers, in turmoil, misguided, cultish, one's who lack common sense, one's having personality problems, one's who hallucinate, one's who possess neuroses and psychoses, one's who lack self-confidence, etc. (the list or slurs and aspersions goes on and on).

After making all these accusations against the integrity and credibility of Sai devotees, Anti-Sai Activists then attempt to build their case against Sathya Sai Baba by citing the words of and comments and books written by SAI DEVOTEES!

Anti-Sai Activists are a bunch of flip-floppers who are incapable of making a consistent and sober argument against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. This is also evidenced in the article I wrote about Brian Steel in which he loquaciously prattled against the integrity and accuracy of English discourse translations, yet then flip-flopped and cited these same inaccurate English discourse translations as accurate and factual references against Sri Sathya Sai Baba!

Fully exposed perverts, deviants and pathological liars (like Sanjay Kishore Dadlani) fail to understand that they fully compromise their own arguments and positions against Shree Satya Sai Baba. If we are to believe Anti-Sai Activists, then we must believe that Sai Devotees are honest, truthful, accurate, factual and objective. Why cite devotee's books, words or publications otherwise?

Needless to say, Anti-Sai Activists refuse to accept these things about Sai devotees. Therefore, Anti-Sai Activist's arguments and defenses are all based on "lies" and speculations (by their own admission). They do not have any conclusive evidence (from any neutral source) to support their conspiracy theories because there are no non-devotee biographies written about Baba. They must depend on the words of Sai devotees. But alas, Sai devotees are not "reliable" according to Anti-Sai Activists. Hence the irony.

Sanjay recently wrote no less than 5 blogged articles about Shirdi Sai Baba and Sathya Sai Baba and poorly attempted to make the argument against the latter being an alleged reincarnation of the former. In my next blogged article, I will discuss the Love Is My Form (LIMF) book, which is the primary source that Sanjay referenced regarding the Sathya/Shirdi Sai Baba controversy.

RELATED BLOG LINKS: » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1 (you are here) » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2 » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3

Sanjay's Sympathy For Terrorists And Murderers

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay wrote an article against me in response to my blogged post entitled "Sanjay Rejoiced When Sai Baba Temples Bombed".

Sanjay said the following:

"Moreno Rejoices, Makes Death Wish"
Now it looks as if Gerald Moreno has also joined the ranks of the fanatics who wish death on anyone with the remotest connection to former devotees and criticism of Sai Baba in general.

Please see: Lisa De Witt: Lisa Bombs A Temple to familiarise yourself with the issues.

After doing that, take a look at Gerald Moreno's posting where he "exposed" the alleged death wish and ended up making a death wish of his own!

Tough luck to Moreno. He considers it to be very "fortunate" that the instigator of the bombings was gunned down by the police, thus openly rejoicing over Yazdani's death.

Macabre magoots, driving themselves bonkers over defending Sathya Sai Baba and creating a show of incredible public ridicule for themselves. This is what it means to be a devotee of Sai Baba: You Lose Your Mind.

Moreno is too far gone to benefit from help. I should know, I'm a Psychology student. :-)

Sanjay's response is very troubling for several reasons.

To begin, I have never wished (nor do I wish) death on anyone belonging to the Anti-Sai group. It is very strange that Sanjay would express the view that a known terrorist had some kind of remote connection with Anti-Sai Activists. Does Sanjay know something we don't? The terrorist whose death I expressed gratitude about was Gulam Yazdani. This is the same person whose death Sanjay said I wished upon "anyone with the remotest connection to former devotees". Gee, I didn't know Yadzani had a "remote connection" with Ex-Devotees.

Let me be perfectly clear about my opinion regarding terrorists who slaughter, rape, torture, persecute and terrorize innocent people without remorse, conscience or regard for human life: In my opinion, anyone (whether they be separatists, rebels, freedom fighters, liberators, revolutionaries, guerrillas, vigilantes, militants, mujaheddins, jihadis or fedayeens) who terrorize innocent people should be stopped by any and all means necessary, including being killed. I am not embarrassed or afraid to voice this opinion and I seriously doubt that there are many people who would disagree with me.

Apparently, Sanjay disagrees with me and actually sympathizes with terrorists and feels that terrorist's lives are worth saving, even at the cost of jeopardizing many innocent lives to obtain theirs. Sanjay needs to get a grip on reality and awaken from his looney-tune world in which he thinks He-Man will save the day. Sanjay envisions the war against terrorism as an invasion where forces counter terrorist's guns, bombs and rockets with pepper spray and paddles.

All of this is not surprising to me in the least. In my opinion, Sanjay is a budding terrorist in his own right. Not only did Sanjay Rejoice When A Sai Baba Temple Was Bombed, he also said he was "so happy" that it happened! What kind of person rejoices when terrorists plant bombs that kill and injure innocent people? What kind of person sympathizes with terrorists and criticizes others when they express gratitude that a vicious terrorist was stopped? I'll tell you what kind of person: A sicko. A sicko who: has Satanic inclinations, fantasizes about cutting himself with razors and licking the barrel of a gun before blowing his brains out, admits he has deeply rooted psychological problems, wages his own Holy War, has a Jesus sex fetish, has a kinky and deviant boot fetish, admits he is full of poison and bitterness and is a chronic pathological liar.

Sanjay also provided a fake screencapture to my blog. His screencapture did not come from my blog. Here is the screencap that Sanjay provided:


Notice that the screencapture does not have the color theme to my blog and it shows a full URL when full URLs are not displayed on my blog. Sanjay is using proxy servers to view my blog because he is afraid that I might trace more of his deviant online behavior, like I did with his former Killuminati Blog and StreetBitches Blog. Sanjay has much to hide and with good reason.