Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1
Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK
Anti-Sai Activists (including Sanjay) love to create controversy about Shirdi & Sathya Sai Baba and cite dates, events and personal testimonies taken from books and publications by Sai Devotees. Here is "my take" regarding all these "controversial" issues:
Anti-Sai Activists (including Sanjay) ceaselessly and unremittingly accuse Sai devotees of being:
After making all these accusations against the integrity and credibility of Sai devotees, Anti-Sai Activists then attempt to build their case against Sathya Sai Baba by citing the words of and comments and books written by SAI DEVOTEES!
Anti-Sai Activists are a bunch of flip-floppers who are incapable of making a consistent and sober argument against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. This is also evidenced in the article I wrote about Brian Steel in which he loquaciously prattled against the integrity and accuracy of English discourse translations, yet then flip-flopped and cited these same inaccurate English discourse translations as accurate and factual references against Sri Sathya Sai Baba!
Fully exposed perverts, deviants and pathological liars (like Sanjay Kishore Dadlani) fail to understand that they fully compromise their own arguments and positions against Shree Satya Sai Baba. If we are to believe Anti-Sai Activists, then we must believe that Sai Devotees are honest, truthful, accurate, factual and objective. Why cite devotee's books, words or publications otherwise?
Needless to say, Anti-Sai Activists refuse to accept these things about Sai devotees. Therefore, Anti-Sai Activist's arguments and defenses are all based on "lies" and speculations (by their own admission). They do not have any conclusive evidence (from any neutral source) to support their conspiracy theories because there are no non-devotee biographies written about Baba. They must depend on the words of Sai devotees. But alas, Sai devotees are not "reliable" according to Anti-Sai Activists. Hence the irony.
Sanjay recently wrote no less than 5 blogged articles about Shirdi Sai Baba and Sathya Sai Baba and poorly attempted to make the argument against the latter being an alleged reincarnation of the former. In my next blogged article, I will discuss the Love Is My Form (LIMF) book, which is the primary source that Sanjay referenced regarding the Sathya/Shirdi Sai Baba controversy.
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK
Anti-Sai Activists (including Sanjay) love to create controversy about Shirdi & Sathya Sai Baba and cite dates, events and personal testimonies taken from books and publications by Sai Devotees. Here is "my take" regarding all these "controversial" issues:
Anti-Sai Activists (including Sanjay) ceaselessly and unremittingly accuse Sai devotees of being:
cult members, brainwashed, unreliable, idiotic, dishonest, deceitful, subjective, inaccurate, biased, minions, ignorant, repressed, prejudiced, projectors, exaggerators, escapists, weak in intellect, easily influenced, highly impressionable, in self-denial, irrational, illogical, embellishers, in turmoil, misguided, cultish, one's who lack common sense, one's having personality problems, one's who hallucinate, one's who possess neuroses and psychoses, one's who lack self-confidence, etc. (the list or slurs and aspersions goes on and on).
After making all these accusations against the integrity and credibility of Sai devotees, Anti-Sai Activists then attempt to build their case against Sathya Sai Baba by citing the words of and comments and books written by SAI DEVOTEES!
Anti-Sai Activists are a bunch of flip-floppers who are incapable of making a consistent and sober argument against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. This is also evidenced in the article I wrote about Brian Steel in which he loquaciously prattled against the integrity and accuracy of English discourse translations, yet then flip-flopped and cited these same inaccurate English discourse translations as accurate and factual references against Sri Sathya Sai Baba!
Fully exposed perverts, deviants and pathological liars (like Sanjay Kishore Dadlani) fail to understand that they fully compromise their own arguments and positions against Shree Satya Sai Baba. If we are to believe Anti-Sai Activists, then we must believe that Sai Devotees are honest, truthful, accurate, factual and objective. Why cite devotee's books, words or publications otherwise?
Needless to say, Anti-Sai Activists refuse to accept these things about Sai devotees. Therefore, Anti-Sai Activist's arguments and defenses are all based on "lies" and speculations (by their own admission). They do not have any conclusive evidence (from any neutral source) to support their conspiracy theories because there are no non-devotee biographies written about Baba. They must depend on the words of Sai devotees. But alas, Sai devotees are not "reliable" according to Anti-Sai Activists. Hence the irony.
Sanjay recently wrote no less than 5 blogged articles about Shirdi Sai Baba and Sathya Sai Baba and poorly attempted to make the argument against the latter being an alleged reincarnation of the former. In my next blogged article, I will discuss the Love Is My Form (LIMF) book, which is the primary source that Sanjay referenced regarding the Sathya/Shirdi Sai Baba controversy.
| RELATED BLOG LINKS: » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1 (you are here) » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2 » » Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3 |
posted by Equalizer @ 1:14 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home