Sanjay Dadlani Exposed

NeuroWhoa - Hesitant Iconoclast - Neuronerd - Brainiac

2009-02-21T08:46:00.000-08:00

NeuroWhoa - Hesitant Iconoclast - Neuronerd - Brainiac
“Mad Neuroscientist, Crackpot, Enfant Terrible”

Sanjay Dadlani has been actively attempting to cover-up and suppress any and all internet sources that may lead readers to unsavory information about him (especially in relation to his proven defamations, libels, sexual deviancy, perversions and involvement in the Sai Controversy). For example, Sanjay Dadlani has subsequently changed his Azra‘iL (Angel Of Death) nic on the Gaudiya-Repercussions website to “Brainiac” and also changed his featured blog from “SaiBabaExposed” to “NeuroWhoa!”. Sanjay Dadlani also deactivated public access to several of his blogs (which contained graphic, sexually perverse and defamatory material) and even blocked access to them from archive.org:

soulblood.blogspot.com (archive.org status)

killuminati.blogspot.com (archive.org status)

talkpolitical.blogspot.com (archive.org status)

whorehouseblues.blogspot.com (archive.org status)

wikimoreno.blogspot.com (archive.org status)

Blogger does not automatically block access to archive.org. Only the blog webmaster can request archive.org to block access to his/her blog. For example, see the archive.org result for SanjayDadlaniExposed. Apparently, Sanjay Dadlani has much to fear (and with good reason).

Sanjay Dadlani’s other blogs, however, are still available on the internet and can be traced directly to him. These blogs reveal Sanjay Dadlani’s venom, vitriol and bold-faced hypocrisy (especially in relation to his pseudo-Hare-Krishna-devotee posturing). The following blogs are publicly accessible as of February 21st 2009:

‘Gaurasundara Das’ Blogger Profile

gaurasundara.blogspot.com

gaudiyavedanta.blogspot.com

‘H.H. Swami Saiexposedananda’ Blogger Profile

saibababhajans.blogspot.com

lisadeewitt.blogspot.com

simonbrace.blogspot.com

morenojoe.blogspot.com

geraldmoreno.blogspot.com

saicopycats.blogspot.com

saibabaexposed.blogspot.com

Additional Information About: NeuroWhoa : Hesitant Iconoclast : Neuronerd : Brainiac
Sanjay Dadlani And His Deviant Sexual Fetishes:

→ Sanjay Dadlani’s Jesus Sex Fetish

→ Sanjay Dadlani's ‘Street Bitches’ Blog Exposed

→ Sanjay Dadlani And His ‘Killuminati’ Blog

Sanjay Dadlani’s Perversions On QuickTopic:

Proof For Sanjay Dadlani’s 3 IPs On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani’s Fake Names On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani’s Violent And Gay Slurs On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘Marquis De Sade’ On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘Om Sai’ On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As Females On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘James’ On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘Edward’ On QuickTopic

Ascertaining Sanjay Dadlani’s Proxy IP On QuickTopic

‘Ekantik’ aka ‘Gaurasundara’ aka Sanjay Dadlani On Wikipedia:

User:Ekantik aka User:Gaurasundara aka Sanjay Dadlani

ArbCom Evidence Section About User:Ekantik aka User:Gaurasundara

Ekantik’s Bogus Credentials On Wikipedia

Relevant Links About: NeuroWhoa : Hesitant Iconoclast : Neuronerd : Brainiac

- NeuroWhoa! Blog
- NeuroWhoa! On Twitter
- NeuroWhoa! YouTube Profile
- NeuroWhoa On Reddit
- NeuroWhoa On Technorati
- Sanjay Dadlani’s Myspace Page (‘vishvarupa’ nic taken from Moreno’s domain)

This is the disgusting truth about Sanjay Kishore Dadlani, aka “NeuroWhoa” aka “Hesitant Iconoclast” aka “Neuronerd” aka “Brainiac” aka “Ekantik” aka “Gaurasundara” aka “Gaurasundara Das” aka “H.H. Swami Saiexposedananda” aka “Jay” aka “saiexposed420” aka “Dark Knight” aka “Azra‘iL”, etc., etc., etc.

Sanjay should change his name from “NeuroWhoa!” to “Neurotic Woe!”

Sanjay Dadlani - Hypocritical Preacher

2007-11-26T16:18:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Although Sanjay Kishore Dadlani has been thoroughly exposed as a sexual deviant, potty-mouthed extremist, pervert and pathological liar, he is attempting to deceive readers of his gaurasundara blog that he is a devotee of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and Bhagavan Sri Krishna.

Amusingly, Sanjay changed his blog title from "Gaurasundara's Musings" to "Adventures in Humility : News, Views, and Chews on spiritual issues", actually claiming that he possesses humility (which has been bestowed on him by God Almighty nonetheless)! *rolls eyes*

Some amusing, hypocritical and self-serving quotes from "Bhakta" Sanjay aka Gaurasundara Das' blog:

"A devotee never considered himself great but took a most humble position. Although Sri Krsna Caitanya was God Himself, He nevertheless maintained the humble mood of a devotee...This made me realise that even the principle of humility is observed by the mercy of Gaura as it is ia function of His kripa, and that those who are truly humble are such because they have received said kripa. At the same time, by virtue of the trinad api sunicena verse, His followers are enjoined to practice humility in all their dealings...I thought about it for a long time, but I eventually decided against writing my reflections on recent less-than-civilised events in certain forums as I felt that that little good would be accomplished by my doing so. However, the said events did make me realise just how easy it is to give lip-service to the principles of Vaishnavism and to perhaps project an image of oneself as a 'perfect' practising devotee. It then becomes interesting to observe the standard of behaviour employed when events happen that disrupt the general understandings of people. It seems to me that people are very quick to rip apart and demonise before first taking a step back and wondering if their reactions are really justified, or will they inflame the situation further. In any case, history has usually shown that it is not humble behaviour...I think it is vertaibly impossible to describe the wondrous nature of humility as a large number books can be written about the manifold ways in which this principle can be observed in all sorts of situations. Maybe that's why it is written in Bhakti-Ratnakara above that true happiness lies in humility and this is why Sriman Mahaprabhu made it a point to teach it to His followers. More so that humility descends as a a result of His mercy. What else is there to say?" (Reference)

If one says 'Krishna' even once without offense, I will certainly deliver him."
(CB 3.19.210..213-214)

"Dear me, such a beautiful image. Beautiful Mahaprabhu raising His arms aloft and imploring the world to chant 'Krishna' without offenses and promising to personally deliver them!" (Reference)

"For years I have been telling anyone who'll listen about the glories of Mahaprabhu's beautiful Golden Lotus Feet. Mahaprabhu's lotus feet are the most beautiful golden colour, softer than a rose. His toenails are so shiny, you can see your face in them." (Reference

Yes, we've all heard this little story before: When you point a finger at someone, there are three fingers pointing right back at you. Ergo, be mindful of what/who you're pointing at and refrain from criticism lest you be hypocritical and end up being judged by your own standards...You point a finger at someone and criticise them with your mouth, why not point a finger and say something nice about them? Or better still, use your mouth to glorify Hari instead of wasting your time criticising a Vaishnava. And didn't you know that criticising Vaishnavas makes Mahaprabhu angry? So there you go: Mahaprabhu's secret formula to bring out the best in you when you're attempting to do your worst." (Reference

These quotes amount to nothing less than public deception, self-promotion, ego-boosting and hypocritical 'devotee' posturing. Sanjay Kishore Dadlani attempts to deceive others into thinking he is something he is not. Preaching love, humility and devotion, Sanjay makes the case for me that he is a con-man, spiritual fraud and a sciolist who attempts to ciphon respect (much in the same way he attempts to ciphon semen to his brain) from Vaishnava Devotees because he can't get it anywhere else.

Sanjay Dadlani viciously defames others, wages brutal personal attacks, pathologically lies and then pretends he is humble, truthful, pious, meek and devoted to Sri Chaitanya and Bhagavan Sri Krishna and mushes and gushes about their lotus feet, merciful glances, glory, beauty, etc. Sanjay believes that he can act as grotesquely as he chooses because all he has to do is say "Krishna" once "without offence" and all his sins are forgiven!

Sanjay even created a new webpage at gaurasundara.googlepages.com and goes by yet another name (one of 36 known names) of "Sayana Dvadasi" (also spelled "Sayana Dwadasi"). Sayana Dvadasi is the dvadasi (following Sayana Ekadasi) when Lord Vishnu takes rest on the Ocean of Milk for four months during the period called "Chaturmasya". Sanjay also used the following picture of Gaurasundara on his blog (yes, that's a man):

Although the picture above is aesthetic and beautiful, it is strange that Sanjay is so attached to it considering he has problems with (as he put it) "girly and gay gods", which he termed "3G".

More Philosophical Dvaita Vedanta Nonsense From Sanjay Dadlani

2007-08-06T12:17:00.001-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani recently wrote an article about Sathya Sai Baba and Dvaita Vedanta that said, in part:

"It shouldn't come as a surprise that Sai Baba also claims to be a poorna avatar. Of course, nothing else would be appropriate enough to describe his great magnificence. :-) Sai Baba's 'poorna' status is supposed to be exemplified via the sensational nature of his "astounding miracles", welfare works, all-inclusive spiritual teachings, and the like. After all, wouldn't GOD be perfectly capable of transmitting new holy teachings for the benefit of the world, which explain absolutely everything?

Here comes the crunch: Dvaita Vedanta is one of the three major philosophical schools of Hindu theology, the other two being Vishishtadvaita Vedanta and Advaita Vedanta. Whereas seekers of Eastern spirituality are likely to have heard of or be influenced by Advaita above all, Dvaita (also known as Tattvavada) has an increasing reputation for having formed its conclusions on a strong basis of sound reasoning, admirable rigorousness and textual clarity. In other words, Dvaita followers have extremely good reasons for believing the way they do, and Dvaita holds that there is no such thing as poorna avatars. :-)

The reason for this is rather simple: Since avatars are descents of one deity, Vishnu, it naturally follows that they are all emanations of his and would naturally possess all of his potencies. In theory, it is possible for Matsya and other "minor" avatars to exhibit and fully display all the astounding powers of God displayed by the 'poornas' like Rama and Krishna, and the reason for why they didn't do so is really because there was no call to do so. Otherwise it is regarded that each and every incarnation of Vishnu is possessed of 'full' and 'complete' power and are thus equal to each other. There is no gradation among the incarnations of Vishnu as they are all him.

Not everyone will agree with this, but there you have it: the viewpoint of Dvaita Vedanta on this subject. This leads us to the natural consequence that Sathya Sai Baba's claims to 'poorna' avatarhood will have no credibility among the followers of Dvaita Vedanta and they are not likely to brook such nonsense either.

At the very least, this is a perfect example of how Sathya Sai Baba's divine and supposedly all-inclusive teachings are incompatible with Dvaita Vedanta philosophy. :-) One of the Baba's oft-quoted platitudes urges Hindus to be better Hindus, Christians to be better Christians, Muslims to be better Muslims, and so on. This will not apply for the Dvaita Vedantin, as Sai Baba's meaningless witterings about 'poorna' avatars will hold no weight with such people. After all, how can Sai Baba claim anything "special" about his status when his claim doesn't even exist in their religious paradigm? :-)"

Well the real "crunch" about Sanjay's useless and pointless article is that Dvaita Vedanta is not accepted by Christianity, Islam, Agnosticism, Atheism, Buddhism, Chinese traditional religions, Primal indigenous religions, African tradional and diasporic religions, Sikhism, Judaism, Rastafarianism, etc.

Dvaita Vedanta forms an extremely small percentage of religious adherents and their God Concept is rather meaningless in the overall schema of religious beliefs. Turning the tables, Dvaita Vedantin's God Concept is meaningless and holds no weight to the majority of religious/non-religious adherents that populate the Earth. How can Dvaita Vedantins claim anything special about Vishnu when their claims do not even exist in the majority paradigms that religious/non-religious people happen to believe in? Needless to say, the majority religions would not brook such nonsense either :-)

Furthermore, Gaudiya Vaishnavism (which Sanjay fully professes belief in) fully advocates for the concept of Poorna Avatars and a special emphasis is always placed on Radha-Krishna. Krishna is considered the fullest and Original Personality of Godhead, with whom other avatars simply do not compare. Needless to say, Sanjay's Gaudiya Vaishnava beliefs in the Supreme Personality of Godhead and that Lord Krishna is the source of Vishnu (and not an incarnation of Him) have no credibility among followers of Dvaita Vedanata (who believe that Vishnu is the Supreme Being and Lord Krishna was an incarnation of Him and not vice versa).

Therefore, Sanjay Dadlani just formed another argument against his own Gaudiya Vaishnava beliefs. The only time Sanjay opens his mouth is to stick his other foot in it. Since Sanjay Dadlani believes that Dvaita Vedanta "forms its conclusions on a strong basis of sound reasoning, admirable rigorousness and textual clarity", I suggest he approach the Bhaktivedanta Manor in the UK (which he attends and whose marble deities he bows before as God Incarnate) and tell them to replace the statues of RadhaKrishna and Ramachandra with one of Vishnu because Dvaita Vedantins worship Vishnu as the Supreme Being and their beliefs are somehow meritorious and are based on sound reasoning, admirable rigorousness and textual clarity. lol

To top off all this nonsense, Sanjay Dadlani does not believe in Dvaita Vedanta per se. The Sutras of Vyasa are the basis of Vedanta philosophy. These Sutras have been commented on by various scholars/devotees and various interpretations have given rise to several schools of thought. For example:

Kevala Advaita philosophy of Sri Sankaracharya

The philosophy of Qualified Monism or Visishtadvaita of Sri Ramanuja

Dvaita philosophy of Sri Madhvacharya

The Bhedabheda philosophy of Sri Nimbarkacharya

The Suddha Advaita philosophy of Sri Vallabhacharya

The Achintya Bhedabheda philosophy of Sri Chaitanya

The Siddhanta philosophy of Sri Meykandar

Apparently, Sanjay has a lot of time on his hands (since his University put a stop to his boot fetish stalking habits) and decided to bore everyone with his pointless philosophical nonsense.

It worked.

Blogged Index Of Articles To Date

2007-06-04T23:05:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Blog Index Of Articles From December 2006 - May 2007:

Sanjay Dadlani Exposed On QuickTopic:
- Dadlani's Proxy IP On QuickTopic
- Dadlani's Fake Name Of 'Edward' On QuickTopic
- Dadlani's Fake Name Of 'James' On QuickTopic
- Dadlani's Female Identities On QuickTopic
- Om Sai And Sanjay Dadlani
- Marquis de Sade And Sanjay Dadlani On QuickTopic
- Dadlani's Gay Slurs On QuickTopic

Sanjay Dadlani On Wikipedia:
- Ekantik Expert About 'Barebacking'
- Ekantiks Bogus Credentials On Wikipedia
- Wikipedia, Ekantik, Mel Etitis And Peter J King
- Ekantik, Gaurasundara And Sanjay Dadlani
- Gaudiya Kutir Wiki - Newest Editor

Sathya Sai Baba:
- Sathya Sai Baba
- In Defence Of Sathya Sai Baba

Miscellaneous:
- Sanjay's Black Soul
- Did Newsweek 'Slam' Sathya Sai Baba?
- The "Photographic Evidence" Lie
- Barbara Dent & Sanjay Dadlani
- Yahoo's Covert Operations
- British Controversy & Sathya Sai Baba
- Damage Control Kicks Into High Gear

Previous Blogged Articles:
- Blog Index Of Articles (Nov 06)

Previous Blogged Articles:
- Blog Index Of Articles (Oct 06)

Previous Blogged Articles:
- Blog Index Of Articles (Dec 05 - Sept 06)

Sanjay's Black Soul

2007-04-19T23:49:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

As an update to my former articles entitled:

The Angel Of Death: Azra'iL

Sanjay's Satanic Inclinations

Sanjay And The Satanic Bible

I noticed that Sanjay (under the name "Azra'il", the Angel of Death) changed his previous picture on Gaudiya-Repercussions.com from a skeletal demonic pic to a newer demonic pic (taken from a Motorhead CD Cover).

Sanjay changed the following picture:

To this picture:

The original picture looks like this:

If you take a closer look at the image, the steel skull is centered in an airplane that is dropping an atomic bomb with US and Confederate flags on either side, along with skulls with enormous side-fangs.

Of course, the big question is: WHY is a self-professed devotee of Caitanya Mahaprabu and a practicing Vaishnava (who bows before stone idols, worshipping them as God incarnate) using satanic, demonic, dark and violent images to represent his online identity? Sanjay already answered this question himself. View my article entitled Bitter And Poison.

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani displays all the signs and symptoms of a mentally disturbed person who is a ticking bomb just waiting to explode.

Did Newsweek 'Slam' Sathya Sai Baba?

2007-04-18T11:33:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay recently wrote an article on his blog claiming that Newsweek "slammed" Sathya Sai Baba. So did Newsweek really 'slam' Sathya Sai Baba? The answer is "no". Sam Harris (a self-professed rationalist and Atheist) slammed Sai Baba in an article published in Newsweek. It is amusing that Sanjay Dadlani (a self-professed Hare Krishna Congregational Member and a believer in God) would support and cite an Atheist against Sathya Sai Baba. Little does Sanjay know that by advocating for Sam Harris' Atheisim, he is advocating for Harris' views that his God (Lord Krishna) is a mythical being and Krsna's alleged miracles never really occurred!

NEWSWEEK ARTICLE:
God Debate: Sam Harris vs. Rick Warren

At the Summit: On a cloudy California day, the atheist Sam Harris sat down with the Christian pastor Rick Warren to hash out Life's Biggest Question—Is God real? A NEWSWEEK exclusive.

Newsweek

April 9, 2007 issue - Rick Warren is as big as a bear, with a booming voice and easygoing charm. Sam Harris is compact, reserved and, despite the polemical tone of his books, friendly and mild. Warren, one of the best-known pastors in the world, started Saddleback in 1980; now 25,000 people attend the church each Sunday. Harris is softer-spoken; paragraphs pour out of him, complex and fact-filled—as befits a Ph.D. student in neuroscience. At NEWSWEEK's invitation, they met in Warren's office recently and chatted, mostly amiably, for four hours. Jon Meacham moderated. Excerpts follow.

JON MEACHAM: Rick, since you're the home team, we'll start with Sam. Sam, is there a God in the sense that most Americans think of him?
SAM HARRIS: There's no evidence for such a God, and it's instructive to notice that we're all atheists with respect to Zeus and the thousands of other dead gods whom now nobody worships.

Rick, what is the evidence of the existence of the God of Abraham?
RICK WARREN: I see the fingerprints of God everywhere. I see them in culture. I see them in law. I see them in literature. I see them in nature. I see them in my own life. Trying to understand where God came from is like an ant trying to understand the Internet. Even the most brilliant scientist would agree that we only know a fraction of a percent of the knowledge of the universe.

HARRIS: Any scientist must concede that we don't fully understand the universe. But neither the Bible nor the Qur'an represents our best understanding of the universe. That is exquisitely clear.

WARREN: To you.

HARRIS: There is so much about us that is not in the Bible. Every specific science from cosmology to psychology to economics has surpassed and superseded what the Bible tells us is true about our world.

Sam, does the Christian you address in your books have to believe that God wrote the Bible and that it is literally true?
HARRIS: Well, there's clearly a spectrum of confidence in the text. I mean, there's the "This is literally true, nothing even gets figuratively interpreted," and then there's the "This is just the best book we have, written by the smartest people who have ever lived, and it's still legitimate to organize our lives around it to the exclusion of other books." Anywhere on that spectrum I have a problem, because in my mind the Bible and the Qur'an are just books, written by human beings. There are sections of the Bible that I think are absolutely brilliant and poetically unrivaled, and there are sections of the Bible which are the sheerest barbarism, yet profess to prescribe a divinely mandated morality—where do I start? Books like Leviticus and Deuteronomy and Exodus and First and Second Kings and Second Samuel—half of the kings and prophets of Israel would be taken to The Hague and prosecuted for crimes against humanity if these events took place in our own time.

[To Warren] Is the Bible inerrant?
WARREN: I believe it's inerrant in what it claims to be. The Bible does not claim to be a scientific book in many areas.

Do you believe Creation happened in the way Genesis describes it?
WARREN: If you're asking me do I believe in evolution, the answer is no, I don't. I believe that God, at a moment, created man. I do believe Genesis is literal, but I do also know metaphorical terms are used. Did God come down and blow in man's nose? If you believe in God, you don't have a problem accepting miracles. So if God wants to do it that way, it's fine with me.

HARRIS: I'm doing my Ph.D. in neuroscience; I'm very close to the literature on evolutionary biology. And the basic point is that evolution by natural selection is random genetic mutation over millions of years in the context of environmental pressure that selects for fitness.

WARREN: Who's doing the selecting?

HARRIS: The environment. You don't have to invoke an intelligent designer to explain the complexity we see.

WARREN: Sam makes all kinds of assertions based on his presuppositions. I'm willing to admit my presuppositions: there are clues to God. I talk to God every day. He talks to me.

HARRIS: What does that actually mean?

WARREN: One of the great evidences of God is answered prayer. I have a friend, a Canadian friend, who has an immigration issue. He's an intern at this church, and so I said, "God, I need you to help me with this," as I went out for my evening walk. As I was walking I met a woman. She said, "I'm an immigration attorney; I'd be happy to take this case." Now, if that happened once in my life I'd say, "That is a coincidence." If it happened tens of thousands of times, that is not a coincidence.

There must have been times in your ministry when you've prayed for someone to be delivered from disease who is not—say, a little girl with cancer.
WARREN: Oh, absolutely.

So, parse that. God gave you an immigration attorney, but God killed a little girl.
WARREN: Well, I do believe in the goodness of God, and I do believe that he knows better than I do. God sometimes says yes, God sometimes says no and God sometimes says wait. I've had to learn the difference between no and not yet. The issue here really does come down to surrender. A lot of atheists hide behind rationalism; when you start probing, you find their reactions are quite emotional. In fact, I've never met an atheist who wasn't angry.

HARRIS: Let me be the first.

WARREN: I think your books are quite angry.

HARRIS: I would put it at impatient rather than angry. Let me respond to this notion of answered prayer, because this is a classic sampling error, to use a statistical phrase. We know that human beings have a terrible sense of probability. There are many things we believe that confirm our prejudices about the world, and we believe this only by noticing the confirmations, and not keeping track of the disconfirmations. You could prove to the satisfaction of every scientist that intercessory prayer works if you set up a simple experiment. Get a billion Christians to pray for a single amputee. Get them to pray that God regrow that missing limb. This happens to salamanders every day, presumably without prayer; this is within the capacity of God. [Warren is laughing.] I find it interesting that people of faith only tend to pray for conditions that are self-limiting.

WARREN: That's a misstatement there.

HARRIS: Let's go back to the Bible. The reason you believe that Jesus is the son of God is because you believe that the Gospel is a valid account of the miracles of Jesus.

WARREN: It's one of the reasons.

HARRIS: Yeah. It's one of the reasons. Now, there are many testimonials about miracles, every bit as amazing as the miracles of Jesus, in other literature of the world's religions. Even contemporary miracles. There are millions of people who believe that Sathya Sai Baba, the south Indian guru, was born of a virgin, has raised the dead and materializes objects. I mean, you can watch some of his miracles on YouTube. Prepare to be underwhelmed. He's a stage magician. As a Christian, you can say Sathya Sai Baba's miracle stories are not interesting, let's not pay attention to them, but if you set them within the prescientific religious milieu of the first-century Roman Empire, suddenly miracle stories become especially compelling.

Sam, what are the secular sources of an acceptable moral code?
HARRIS: Well, I don't think that the religious books are the source. We go to the Bible and we are the judge of what is good. We see the golden rule as the great distillation of ethical impulses, but the golden rule is not unique to the Bible or to Jesus; you see it in many, many cultures—and you see some form of it among nonhuman primates. I'm not at all a moral relativist. I think it's quite common among religious people to believe that atheism entails moral relativism. I think there is an absolute right and wrong. I think honor killing, for example, is unambiguously wrong—you can use the word evil. A society that kills women and girls for sexual indiscretion, even the indiscretion of being raped, is a society that has killed compassion, that has failed to teach men to value women and has eradicated empathy. Empathy and compassion are our most basic moral impulses, and we can even teach the golden rule without lying to ourselves or our children about the origin of certain books or the virgin birth of certain people.

Rick, Christianity has conducted itself in an abjectly evil manner from time to time. How do you square that with the Christian Gospel of love?
WARREN: I don't feel duty-bound to defend stuff that's done in the name of God which I don't think God approved or advocated. Have things been done wrong in the name of Christianity? Yes. Sam makes the statement in his book that religion is bad for the world, but far more people have been killed through atheists than through all the religious wars put together. Thousands died in the Inquisition; millions died under Mao, and under Stalin and Pol Pot. There is a home for atheists in the world today—it's called North Korea. I don't know any atheists who want to go there. I'd much rather live under Tony Blair, or even George Bush. The bottom line is that atheists, who accuse Christians of being intolerant, are as intolerant—

HARRIS: How am I being intolerant? I'm not advocating that we lock people up for their religious beliefs. You can get locked up in Western Europe for denying the Holocaust. I think that's a terrible way of addressing the problem. This really is one of the great canards of religious discourse, the idea that the greatest crimes of the 20th century were perpetrated because of atheism. The core problem for me is divisive dogmatism. There are many kinds of dogmatism. There's nationalism, there's tribalism, there's racism, there's chauvinism. And there's religion. Religion is the only sphere of discourse where dogma is actually a good word, where it is considered ennobling to believe something strongly based on faith.

WARREN: You don't feel atheists are dogmatic?

HARRIS: No, I don't.

WARREN: I'm sorry, I disagree with you. You're quite dogmatic.

HARRIS: OK, well, I'm happy to have you point out my dogmas, but first let me deal with Stalin. The killing fields and the gulag were not the product of people being too reluctant to believe things on insufficient evidence. They were not the product of people requiring too much evidence and too much argument in favor of their beliefs. We have people flying planes in our buildings because they have theological grievances against the West. I'm noticing Christians doing terrible things explicitly for religious reasons—for instance, not fund-ing [embryonic] stem-cell research. The motive is always paramount for me. No society in human history has ever suffered because it has become too reasonable. WARREN: We're in exact agreement on that. I just happen to believe that Christianity saved reason. We would not have the Bill of Rights without Christianity.

HARRIS: That's certainly a disputable claim. The idea that somehow we are getting our morality out of the Judeo-Christian tradition is bad history and bad science.

WARREN: Where do you get your morality? If there is no God, if I am simply complicated ooze, then the truth is, your life doesn't matter, my life doesn't matter.

HARRIS: That is a total caricature of—

WARREN: No, let me finish. I let you caricature Christianity. If life is just random chance, then nothing really does matter and there is no morality—it's survival of the fittest. If survival of the fittest means me killing you to survive, so be it. For years, atheists have said there is no God, but they want to live like God exists. They want to live like their lives have meaning. HARRIS: Our morality, the meaning we find in life, is a lived experience that I believe has, to use a loaded term, a spiritual component. I believe it is possible to radically transform our experience of the world for the better, very much the way someone like Jesus, or someone like Buddha, witnessed. There is wisdom in our spiritual, contemplative literature, and I am quite interested in understanding it. I think that medita-tion and prayer affect us for the better. The question is, what is reasonable to believe on the basis of those transformations?

WARREN: You will not admit that it is your experience that makes you an atheist, not rationality.

HARRIS: What in your experience is making you someone who is not a Muslim? I presume that you are not losing sleep every night wondering whether to convert to Islam. And if you're not, it is because when the Muslims say, "We have a book that's the perfect word of the creator of the universe, it's the Qur'an, it was dictated to Muhammad in his cave by the archangel Gabriel," you see a variety of claims there that aren't backed up by sufficient evidence. If the evidence were sufficient, you would be compelled to be Muslim.

WARREN: That's exactly right.

HARRIS: So you and I both stand in a relationship of atheism to Islam.

WARREN: We both stand in a relationship of faith. You have faith that there is no God. In 1974, I spent the better part of a year living in Japan, and I studied all the world religions. All of the religions basically point toward truth. Buddha made this famous statement at the end of his life: "I'm still searching for the truth." Muhammad said, "I am a prophet of the truth." The Veda says, "Truth is elusive, it's like a butterfly, you've got to search for it." Then Jesus Christ comes along and says, "I am the truth." All of a sudden, that forces a decision.

HARRIS: Many, many other prophets and gurus have said that.

WARREN: Here's the difference. Jesus says, "I am the only way to God. I am the way to the Father." He is either lying or he's not.

Sam, is Rick intellectually dishonest?
HARRIS: I wouldn't put it in such an invidious way, but—

Let's say Rick's not here and we're just hanging out in his office.
HARRIS: It is intellectually dishonest, frankly, to say that you are sure that Jesus was born of a virgin.

WARREN: I say I accept that by faith. And I think it's intellectually dishonest for you to say you have proof that it didn't happen. Here's the difference between you and me. I am open to the possibility that I am wrong in certain areas, and you are not.

HARRIS: Oh, I am absolutely open to that.

WARREN: So you are open to the possibility that you might be wrong about Jesus?

HARRIS: And Zeus. Absolutely.

WARREN: And what are you doing to study that?

HARRIS: I consider it such a low-probability event that I—

WARREN: A low probability? When there are 96 percent believers in the world? So is everybody else an idiot?

HARRIS: It is quite possible for most people to be wrong—as are most Americans who think that evolution didn't occur.

WARREN: That's an arrogant statement.

HARRIS: It's an honest statement.

Rick, if you had been born in India or in Iran, would you have different religious beliefs?
WARREN: There's no doubt where you're born influences your initial beliefs. Regardless of where you were born, there are some things you can know about God, even without the Bible. For instance, I look at the world and I say, "God likes variety." I say, "God likes beauty." I say, "God likes order," and the more we understand ecology, the more we understand how sensitive that order is.

HARRIS: Then God also likes smallpox and tuberculosis.

WARREN: I would attribute a lot of the sins in the world to myself.

HARRIS: Are you responsible for smallpox?

WARREN: I am responsible to do something about it. No doubt about it. I am responsible to do something about the 500 million who get malaria every year and the 40 million who have AIDS, because I will be held accountable for my life. And when I say, "God, why don't you do something about this?" God says, "Well, why don't you? You were the answer to your own prayer."

HARRIS: I totally agree with Rick: it is our responsibility to help bridge these inequities, but I think you become even more motivated, potentially, to help people when you realize there is no good reason, certainly not a supernatural good reason, for the fact that I have so much and my neighbor has so little.

Do you think that religiously motivated good works are actually harmful?
HARRIS: The thing that bothers me about faith-based altruism is that it is contaminated with religious ideas that have nothing to do with the relief of human suffering. So you have a Christian minister in Africa who's doing really good work, helping those who are hungry, healing the sick. And yet, as part of his job description, he feels he needs to preach the divinity of Jesus in communities where literally millions of people have been killed because of interreligious conflict between Christians and Muslims. It seems to me that that added piece causes unnecessary suffering. I would much rather have someone over there who simply wanted to feed the hungry and heal the sick.

WARREN: You'd much rather have somebody—an atheist—feeding the hungry than a person who believes in God? All of the great movements forward in Western civilization were by believers. It was pastors who led the abolition of slavery. It was pastors who led the woman's right to vote. It was pastors who led the civil-rights movement. Not atheists.

HARRIS: You bring up slavery—I think it's quite ironic. Slavery, on balance, is supported by the Bible, not condemned by it. It's supported with exquisite precision in the Old Testament, as you know, and Paul in First Timothy and Ephesians and Colossians supports it, and Peter—

WARREN: No, he doesn't. He allows it. He doesn't support it.

HARRIS: OK, he allows it. I would argue that we got rid of slavery not because we read the Bible more closely. We got rid of slavery despite the profound inadequacies of the Bible. We got rid of slavery because we realized it was manifestly evil to treat human beings as farm equipment. As it is.

Rick, what is your role as a pastor in encouraging reformation of other faiths?
WARREN: All of the great questions of the 21st century will be religious questions. Will Islam modernize peacefully? What's going to happen to the influx of Muslims into secular Europe, which has lost its faith in Christianity and has nothing to counteract this loss in religious terms? What will replace Marxism in China? In all likelihood it's going to be Christianity. Will America return to its historic roots—will there be a Third Great Awakening, or will America go the way of Europe?

HARRIS: I think the answers, in spiritual and ethical terms, are going to be nondenominational. We are suffering the collision of denominations, specifically the collision with Islam. Whatever is true about us isn't Christian. And it isn't Muslim. Physics isn't Christian, though it was invented by Christians. Algebra isn't Muslim, even though it was invented by Muslims. Whenever we get at the truth, we transcend culture, we transcend our upbringing. The discourse of science is a good example of where we should hold out hope for transcending our tribalism.

WARREN: Why isn't atheism more appealing if it's supposedly the most intellectually honest?

HARRIS: Frankly, it has a terrible PR campaign.

WARREN: [Laughs] It's not a matter of PR.

HARRIS: It is right next to child molester as something you don't want to be. But that is a product, I would argue, of what religious people tell one another about atheism.

Sam, the one thing that I find really troubling in your arguments is that I am guilty, to quote "The End of Faith," of a "ludicrous obscenity" when I take my children to church. That is strong language, and it doesn't exactly encourage dialogue.
HARRIS: To some degree the stridence of my writing is an effort to get people's attention. But I can honestly defend the stridence because I think our situation is that urgent. I am terrified of what seems to me to be a bottleneck that civilization is passing through. On the one hand we have 21st-century disruptive technology proliferating, and on the other we have first-century superstition. A civilization is going to either pass through this bottleneck more or less intact or it won't. And perhaps that fear sounds grandiose, but civilizations end. On any number of occasions, some generation has witnessed the ruination of everything they and their ancestors had built. What especially terrifies me about religious thinking is the expectation on the part of many that civilization is bound to end based on prophecy and its ending is going to be glorious.

WARREN: I believe that history split into A.D. and B.C. because of the Resurrection. And the Resurrection is not only the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is the hope of the world: it says there's more to this life than just here and now. That doesn't mean that I do less, it means that this life is a test, it's a trust and it's a temporary assignment. If death is the end, shoot, I'm not going to waste another minute being altruistic.

HARRIS: How do you account for my altruism?

WARREN: You have common grace. Even in people who don't believe in God, there is a spark God has put in you that says, "There's got to be more to life than just make money and die." I think that that spark does not come from evolution.

Sam wrote that without death, the influence of faith-based religion would be unthinkable.
WARREN: Because we were made in God's image, we were made to last forever. That means I'm going to spend more time on that side of eternity than on this side. If I did not believe that there is a Judgment, if I believed Hitler would actually get away with everything he did, that would be a reason for great despair. The fact is, I do believe there will be a Judgment Day. God is not just a God of love. He is a God of justice. So death is a factor. On the other hand, even if there were no such thing as heaven, I would put my trust in Christ because I have found it a meaningful, satisfactory, significant way to live.

HARRIS: How is it fair for God to have designed a world which gives such ambiguous testimony to his existence? How is it fair to have created a system where belief is the crucial piece, rather than being a good person? How is it fair to have created a world in which by mere accident of birth, someone who grew up Muslim can be confounded by the wrong religion? I don't see how the future of humanity is in good care with those competing orthodoxies.

Rick, let's be blunt. Is Sam's soul in jeopardy, in your view, because he has rejected Jesus?
WARREN: The politically incorrect answer is yes.

HARRIS: Is that the honest answer?

WARREN: The truth is, religion is mutually exclusive. The person who says, "Oh, I just believe them all," is an idiot because the religions flat-out contradict each other. You cannot believe in reincarnation and heaven at the same time.

Sam, let's be blunt as well. Has Rick, in your view, wasted much of his life on behalf of a Gospel that you think is a first-century superstition?
HARRIS: I wouldn't put it in those stark terms, because I don't have a rigid view how someone should spend their life so as not to waste it.

WARREN: What's your politically incorrect answer?

HARRIS: I think you could use your time and attention better than organizing your life around a belief that the Bible is the inerrant word of God and the best book we're ever going to have on every relevant subject.

How would the ideal world work, in the Sam Harris view?
HARRIS: Right now, we have to change the rules to talk about God and spiritual experience and ethics. And I'm denying that that is so. You can have your spirituality. You can go into a cave and practice meditation and transform yourself, and then we can talk about why that happened and how it could be replicated. We may even want, for perfectly rational reasons, to say we want a Sabbath in this country, a genuine Sabbath. Let's realize that there's a power in contemplating the mystery of the universe, and in reminding yourself how much you love the people closest to you, and how much more you could love the people you haven't met yet. There is nothing you have to believe on insufficient evidence in order to talk about that possibility.

WARREN: Sam, do you believe human beings have a spirit?

HARRIS: There are many reasons not to believe in a naive conception of a soul that kind of floats off the brain at death and goes somewhere else. But I do not know.

WARREN: Can you have spirituality without a spirit?

HARRIS: You can feel yourself to be one with the universe.

WARREN: OK, then why can't you just take the next step? Because right now you're talking in extremely nonrational terms.

HARRIS: There's nothing irrational about it. You can close your eyes in meditation and lose the sense of your physical body, totally. Many people draw from that the metaphysical conclusion that "I'm just spirit, and I can transcend the body." That's not the only conclusion you have to draw from that experience, and I don't think it's the best conclusion.

WARREN: You're more spiritual than you think. You just don't want a boss. You don't want a God who tells you what to do.

HARRIS: I don't want to pretend to be certain about anything I'm not certain about.

Rick, last thoughts?
WARREN: I believe in both faith and reason. The more we learn about God, the more we understand how magnificent this universe is. There is no contradiction to it. When I look at history, I would disagree with Sam: Christianity has done far more good than bad. Altruism comes out of knowing there is more than this life, that there is a sovereign God, that I am not God. We're both betting. He's betting his life that he's right. I'm betting my life that Jesus was not a liar. When we die, if he's right, I've lost nothing. If I'm right, he's lost everything. I'm not willing to make that gamble.
© 2007 MSNBC.com

Theists citing Atheists! What's next in this never-ending Anti-Sai comedy show?

Dadlani's Proxy IP On QuickTopic

2007-04-12T21:53:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Ascertaining Sanjay Dadlani's Proxy IP On QuickTopic
It is a fact that Sanjay Dadlani used Proxy servers to view my websites and blogs. Sanjay accidentally posted a response on the SSB2 Yahoo Group in which he divulged a link to my website using Proxify (Reference). Needless to say, I immediately confronted Sanjay about his use of a proxy server to view my website (Reference).

In one of Sanjay's blogged articles attacking me, he provided the following screencap to my blog:

If one views the blogged post in question, one will notice that the screencap does not match the color theme or linking method used on my blog. The reason why Sanjay's screencap does not match my blog is because he viewed my blog through a proxy server (which explains the removal of the background and the exposure of the full link). The screencap should have looked like this:

It has already been established that Sanjay Dadlani posted as "Marquis de Sade" and "Om Sai" on QuickTopic under two of his known IPs. Sanjay also used the proxy IP "195.171.200.235" that is directly associated with both "Marquis de Sade" and "Om Sai" on QuickTopic.

I found one more post made under the name "Jehosaphat" matching this proxy IP. The posts say:

Marquis de Sade: ""Father," my sister said most imprudently, "we thank you for your proposal. But at our age we have no inclination to have ourselves locked up in a cloister in order to be whores for priests, we’ve had enough of that already."

The Superior renewed his arguments, he spoke with a heat and energy which illustrated his powerful desire to have the thing succeed; finally observing that it was destined to fail, he hurled himself almost in a fury upon my sister.

"Very well, little whore," he cried, "at least satisfy me once again before I take my leave."

And unbuttoning his breeches, he got astride her; she offered no resistance, persuaded that by allowing him to have his way she’d be rid of him all the sooner. And the smutty fellow, pinning her between his knees, began to brandish and then to abuse a tough and rather stout engine, advancing it to within a quarter of an inch of my sister’s face.

"Pretty face," he gasped, "pretty little whore’s face, how I’ll soak it in my fuck, by sweet Jesus!"

And therewith the sluices opened, the sperm flew out, and the entirety of my sister’s face, especially her nose and mouth, were covered with evidence of our visitor’s libertinage, whose passion might not have been so cheaply satisfied had his design in coming to us met with success. More complacent now, the man of God’s only thoughts were of escape; after having flung a crown upon the table and relit his lantern:

"You little fools, you are little tramps," he told us. "You are ruining your chances in this world; may Heaven punish your folly by causing you to fall on evil days, and may I have the pleasure of seeing you in misery; that would be my revenge, that is what I wish you."

My sister, busy wiping her face, paid him back his stupidities in kind, and, our door shutting behind the Superior, we spent the remainder of the night in peace.

"You’ve just seen one of his favorite stunts," said my sister. "He’s mad about discharging in girls’ faces. If he only confined himself to that... but the scoundrel has a good many other eccentricities, and some of them are so dangerous that I do indeed fear..."

But my sister was sleepy, she dozed off without completing her sentence, and the morrow bringing fresh adventures with it, we gave no more thought to that one." (Reference)

Marquis de Sade: "All the hens in the chicken coop had been so terrified that, on the morrow, no misbehavior was discovered, and amongst the boys, only Narcisse, whom, the evening before, Curval had forbidden to wipe his ass, wishing to have it nicely beshitted at coffee, which this child was scheduled to serve, and who had unfortunately forgot his instructions, only Narcisse, I say, had cleaned his anus and he had done so with extreme care. It was in vain the little chap explained that his mistake could be repaired, since, said he, he wanted to shit there and then; he was told to keep what he had, and that he would be none the less inscribed in the fatal book; which inscriptions the redoubtable Durcet instantly performed before his eyes, thus to make him sense all the enormity of his fault, a veritable sin and possibly by itself capable of upsetting or, who knows? of preventing Monsieur le Président’s discharge." (Reference)

Om Sai: "joe homoreno, i think that if u r attracted to sai baba who is a lallupanju and a bhangi this is proof." (Reference)

Jehosaphat: "According to one poster Erlender Haroldson didn't investigate Sai Baba himself under controlled conditions, is this true?" (Reference)

Enough said.

Referenced from saisathyasai.com

Dadlani's Fake Name Of 'Edward' On QuickTopic

2007-04-12T21:37:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As 'Edward' On QuickTopic
Under two of Sanjay Dadlani's known IPs on QuickTopic, he made 7 posts under the name "Edward" and said:

Edward: "Exposed wow, you sure know how to make an entrance! But I find your school topics too highbrow for me because I'm not conversant with the Sai scandals, I'm new to it." (Reference)

Edward: "Joe, are you seriously attempting to say that some sections of the BBC are unreliable? You are unbelievable. The BBC is a world famous broadcaster as Josephine said and they went around filming everything themselves. I've seen the BBC movie and it was very good, I don't think you have a case against them. One small guy against the BBC? No way Jose." (Reference)

Edward: "Joe, I'm surprised at how quickly you've started to act like a little child. What am I supposed to have lied about exactly? And why do you have so much animosity towards Christians like myself? I am not making any allegations against Sai Baba I am just going by what I have read on the Internet. I'd appreciate it if you stop abusing me and talking in a condescending way, talking about Lord Jesus as if you are an expert when it's been a long time since you read a Bible. This is not your board so stop acting as if it belongs to you. More importantly, I'm very disturbed at you don't appear to be concerned at all about any children who may have been abused by this evil pervert and you're only interesting in arguing about their ages and oilings. What do you mean by oilings? And why are you so reluctant to accept this as sexual abuse? Does it really matter how old they are if Sai Baba is sexually abusing them?" (Reference)

Edward: "Joe, you obviously don't know how to hold a conversation and now you have become completely abusive. I should have known there's no talking to brainwashed devotees of evil child abusers. So you are an atheist? No wonder you hate Christians because people like you will never find the love of Lord Jesus Christ. I'm sticking to what I originally said yesterday that you folks should get a life because it is just a waste of breath to talk about an evil person like Sai Baba." (Reference)

Edward: "Joe, as if it makes a blind bit of difference to get into semantics over the definition of children. If enough people say that he is a sexual abuser then that is good reason to stay away and keep your guard up. I can't see how you can have any advantage when you are defending someone who stands charged with very serious accusations such as this. And then there is the idea that he is God! Do you think in your own heart that God would sexually abuse little children when Jesus said in the Bible that children are pure, and that the Kingdom of God is made up of such as them? I don't know how you can stand up in defence of someone who takes away the innocence of children or YOUTHS as you differentiate. This is unconscionable. I hope you can sleep at night." (Reference)

Edward: "Joe108, what drugs are you on? How can you defend an exposed pedophile who has raped children? Open your eyes and let the light of God shine in them, not the fake fraud Sathya Sai Baba. Open your heart too." (Reference)

Edward: "Sai Baba? What's the point? Why are you folks wasting your breath? He's already been proven as a fraudster, you people evidently have too much time on your hands. Get a life." (Reference)

It is not surprising to me that Sanjay Dadlani attempted to pass himself off as a Christian considering that he has a Jesus Sex Fetish.

Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Edward") engaged me in debate and stopped posting under that name after the was thoroughly defeated. Read my responses to Sanjay (aka "Edward") and how he could not factually refute any of my arguments (See: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05).

As a matter of fact, Sanjay praised himself and ended his posts under the fake name of "Edward" by saying:

Edward: "Exposed wow, you sure know how to make an entrance! But I find your school topics too highbrow for me because I'm not conversant with the Sai scandals, I'm new to it." (Reference)

Sanjay clearly attempted to deceive others into thinking that he and "Edward" were two different people. An act so unconvincing, Angelic immediately suspected Sanjay to be "Edward" and told him so (Reference). Needless to say, Sanjay Dadlani lied and said he was not "Edward". As a matter of fact, Sanjay said (under his pseudonym "Sai Baba EXPOSED":

Sai Baba EXPOSED: "Do I look like I care what you think? Bear in mind that you recently decided that Edward was 'usedbybaba'. You change your opinion with the wind and nobody cares anymore about what you think with your crackpot ideas. When everyone else seems to be accepting Edward as an independent person. Your history in this is not very good...Nice to know that you also have multiple usernames which you are perfectly willing to use in deception. :-) Maybe you are Edward? :-)...I already know all of your different IDs. Break the rules and get banned and all of your IDs will get banned. Your silly games won't work. You just don't get it, do you?" (Reference)

Sai Baba EXPOSED: "Funny how you didn't notice that Gerald Moreno was talking to Edward at exactly the same time, but I don't see you accusing him of pretending to have conversations with himself as Edward or Jsephine Kabutla. And by the way, why would I come on as Somasundaram to promote a site about Ramanuja? You have an appallingly bad record at trying to figure out who is who...So please, unless you have some hot-shot proof don't connect me to your ideas about different identities." (Reference)

Funny enough, not only did Sanjay post under the name of "Edward", he also posted under the name of "Josephine Kabutla" (Reference) and "Somasundaram". Look at the following screencap that proves that Sanjay, Edward, Josephine Kabutla and Somasundaram are the same person. The posts are consecutive posts and the IPs are identical because they were posted within a 28 minute time-frame:

Where is Sanjay's name and identical IP? Take a look at the SSB2 Yahoo Group and view the "X-Yahoo-Post-IP:" on posts 53193 and 53194 (made on October 20th 2006, like the posts above on QuickTopic) and you will see the following IP: "212.85.12.187". There's no making this stuff up folks!

Sanjay Dadlani also happens to be a big fan of Ramanuja. As a matter of fact, Sanjay blogged about Ramanuja a couple of times on his "Gaurasundara's Musing" blog (Reference). Now that I have access to all of the IPs on QuickTopic, I have the "hot-shot proof" to connect Sanjay Dadlani to his different identities.

Wasn't it Sir Walter Scott who said in in the epic poem Marmion: "Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."?

Referenced from saisathyasai.com

Dadlani's Fake Name Of 'James' On QuickTopic

2007-04-12T21:28:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As 'James' On QuickTopic
Under all three of Sanjay Dadlani's known IPs on QuickTopic, he made 16 posts under the name "James" and said:

James: "My names is James not sanjay, i told you once already. Is he another dead guy you talk to you stupid cunt? I checked out your shiddi guy on google and he's dead, you talk to dead guys when youre drunk you stupid slut. too funny for life!" (Reference)

James: "Still rattling off like a stupid cunt I see." (Reference)

James: "Ugh, still talking to dead people?" (Reference)

James: "no wonder you're a nutty drunk, you see dead people and accuse me of being someone else! Too funny for life." (Reference)

James: "My name is James not Sanjay you stupid cunt, are you blind as well as drunk? So which dead guy did you talk to today?" (Reference)

James: "You see and talk to dead people, maybe you were drinking? Yes you were" (Reference)

James: "You haven't got a fucking clue what you're talking about you nutjob, you see and talk to deaf people as if they were real that's too funny for life!" (Reference)

James: "Look at you telling other people to get help. You see and talk to dead people, you are a fricking stupid nutcase how can you talk to dead people? Its so funny." (Reference)

James: "You said that you see dead people and TALK to them. You are the last person to talk other other people's level of intelligence. Go and see a doctor you fucking nutjob." (Reference)

James: "These are not conversations, and they cannot be carried on with people who see other dead people. That's too funny. I haven't got a clue what you guys are all talking about but its pretty funny. If there's dead people involved then its even funnier. I expect you believe in God as well?" (Reference)

James: "I googled it already, I told you. I discovered this forum while searching for something else you inquisitive fuckhead. Stop asking stupid questions and tell me all about how you fags can see dead people." (Reference)

James: "No I don't find your comments interesting, very puerile actually. You're the only one arguing and abusing everybody. I just did some googling on Shirdi and turns out he is dead. So you see dead people? You're nuts." (Reference)

James: "No I'm not usedbybaba and I'm not illiterate, I have a college qualification in English, thank you very much. Which is more than what I can say for you fellows. I repeat, try finding something interesting to say instead of calling everyone dumbo. So I didn't get an answer to my question? Who is Shirdi, and is he still alive? How can you see dead people?" (Reference)

James: "Who is this Shirdi person you guys keep talking of? Is he dead? Do you see dead people? Is that what you're saying?" (Reference)

James: "You have a pretty bad level of vocab. Think of something interesting to say other than calling people dumbos." (Reference)

James: "What's with all this dumbo dumbo stuff? Don't you guys have something interesting to say? Every single post has dumbo in it." (Reference)

Sanjay Dadlani (aka "James") lied about his identity and denied (thrice) that he was Sanjay. Not only did Sanjay pretend he did not know who Shirdi Sai Baba was, he spoke in his typical vulgar, confrontational and filthy ways and called others names like:

"stupid cunt" (x3)

"stupid slut"

"nutty drunk"

"nutjob"

"fricking stupid nutcase"

"fucking nutjob"

"fags"

"nuts"

Needless to say, I had a strong feeling that Sanjay was posting incognito as "James" and even said so (Reference). Wherever Sanjay goes, his gutter-mouth follows him and gives him away.

It is also amusing that Sanjay Dadlani (aka "James") bashed people who claim to "see dead people". Putting aside Sanjay's dreams about his dead guru (Srila Prabhupada), he is good friends with the self-professed psychic and Anti-Sai Activist, Anthony Tony O'Clery. Not only does O'Clery believe that he can see and speak to dead people, he also believes he can enter demon trances and that his whole family are psychics.

On post 2329, Sanjay (aka "James") said:

James: "You haven't got a fucking clue what you're talking about you nutjob, you see and talk to deaf people as if they were real that's too funny for life!"

What's so amusing about this comment is that Sanjay made a typo and said "deaf" instead of "dead". Sanjay has suffered from deafness since the age of five. When one reads the post while taking into consideration Sanjay's handicap (and his attempt to deceive others about his identity), the post is really quite funny.

Referenced from saisathyasai.com

Dadlani's Female Identities On QuickTopic

2007-04-12T21:10:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As Females On QuickTopic
Under all three of Sanjay Dadlani's known IPs on QuickTopic, he posted under female names and said:

Josephine Kabutla: "Hi Joe, thanks for the links. But it looks like concentrate way to much on little Alaya and have very little to say about the rest of the BBC movie. Your facts are interesting but I still feel you haven't proven anything concrete. The BBC is a world famous broadcasting company and not a dingy company, so I feel better trusting their reportage of the problem. Thanks anyway." (Reference)

Josephine Kabutla: "I saw the BBC movie about Sathya Sai Baba and I liked it a lot. It was very informative and helped me to come to my conclusions about Baba. I don't think it matters anymore because the testimonies of sexual abuse were very telling and made a great impact on me." (Reference)

Agnes Wiggsbottom: "And yet its CO2000 who sounds like a cracko." (Reference)

Of course, this is not the first time that Sanjay Dadlani became confused about his gender. On another website, Sanjay claimed that he was a "female" twice:

Couple Sanjay Dadlani's penchant for pretending to be female with his homosexual slurs against me on QuickTopic, and things begin to take on a very queer, kinky and deviant tone (something I have blogged about for a very long time).

Referenced from saisathyasai.com

Om Sai And Sanjay Dadlani

2007-04-10T00:18:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As 'Om Sai' On QuickTopic
Under Sanjay Dadlani's known Middlesex University IP, he posted under the name "Om Sai" on Quicktopic and said:

"lisa de bitch y dont u shut the fuck up u silly lallupanju whore" (Reference)

"wow evry1 got excited by lallupanju name, i come from malaysia. saibaba screwed boys from here so he is lallupanju and pervert homosexual, and many of his devotees r homos too." (Reference)

Sanjay Dadlani lied and claimed that he came from Malaysia and attempted to cover-up his identity by changing his writing style. Sanjay Dadlani is notorious for his vulgar and gutter language and he has often referred to women as "bitches", "sluts" and "cunts" (as he did on his Streetbitches Blog).

These posts prove that Sanjay Dadlani actively uses fake identities to spread fraudulent stories against Sathya Sai Baba on the internet. Sanjay Dadlani can often be seen whining and sniveling about others not engaging him in "rational" discussions, etc. Perhaps when Sanjay stops acting like a mentally-unstable irrationalist, he might find someone willing to talk to him. Needless to say, the only intellectual heavy-weights and "rationalists" willing to talk to Sanjay Dadlani are the mentally unstable defamers and liars: Tony O'Clery, UsedByBaba and Barbara Dent!

Nothing like resorting to deception, lies, vulgar name-calling and fake names to engage others in a "rational" discussion with. Eh, Sanjay?

Examples Of Sanjay's Typical Language On The SSB2 Yahoo Group (Also, look at the titles given to the posts):
01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 06; 07; 08; 09; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18

Referenced from saisathyasai.com

Marquis de Sade And Sanjay Dadlani On QuickTopic

2007-04-09T09:44:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani Posted As 'Marquis De Sade' On QuickTopic:
Under two of Sanjay Dadlani's known IPs on QuickTopic (one from Middlesex University, where Sanjay studies), he posted obscene, slimy and sleazy posts under the name "Marquis de Sade" that said:

"Bum-Cleaver lugged a club so amusingly shaped it was nearly impossible for him to perform an embuggery without splitting the ass, whence came the name he bore. The head of his prick resembled the heart of an ox, it was eight and three-eights inches around; behind it, the shaft measured only eight, but was crooked and had such a curve it neatly tore the anus when penetrating it, and this quality, very precious to libertines as jaded as ours, had made him singularly sought after." (Reference)

"By way of a partner for him, Guérin had chosen the dean of our chapter: a tall, sturdy lass of about thirty-six, a great and chronic drunk, loutish, foul-mouthed, rather a fishmonger’s wife, although by no means unattractive; the good Président arrives, they are served supper, both get blind drunk, both become unreasonable, one vomits in the other’s mouth, the one swallows the stuff, then the other vomits into the mouth of the first, now he swallows, and so forth and so on, and they finally collapse into the supper’s debris, that is to say, into the filth they’ve just splashed all over the floor." (Reference)

"Something very humorous indeed had occurred the night before: absolutely drunk, the Duc, instead of gaining his bedchamber, had installed himself in young Sophie's bed, and despite all the child could say, for she knew perfectly well what he was doing violated the rules, he would not be budged, and continued with great heat to maintain he was damned well where he belonged, namely, in his bed with Aline, who was listed as his wife for the night. But as he was allowed certain privileges with Aline which were still forbidden with the little girls, when he sought to put Sophie in the posture that favored the amusements of his choice, and when the poor child, to whom no one had as yet ever done such a thing, felt the massive head of the Duc's prick hammer at her young behind's narrow gate and contrive to batter a thoroughfare, the poor little creature fell to uttering dreadful screeches, and, leaping up, fled naked about the room. The Duc followed hard on her heels, swearing like a demon, still mistaking her for Aline. "Buggress!" he roared, "dost think it the first time?" And fancying he has overtaken her and has her at last, he falls upon Zelmire's bed, thinking it his own, and embraces that little girl, supposing Aline has decided to behave reasonably. The same proceedings with Zelmire as a moment ago with Sophie, because the Duc most decidedly wishes to attain his objective; but immediately Zelmire perceives what he is about, she imitates her companion and duplicates her resistance, pronounces a terrible scream, and leaps away." (Reference)

Marquis De Sade - "120 Days Of Sodom":
After I cut and pasted segments of these posts in a Google search, I discovered that these posts were taken from the French writer Marquis de Sade's 120 Days of Sodom, which was written in 1784. It related stories of four wealthy men who enslaved twenty-four mostly teenaged victims and sexually tortured them while listening to stories told by old prostitutes. Sade wrote The 120 Days of Sodom in the space of thirty-seven days in 1784 whilst he was imprisoned in the Bastille. It was first published in 1904 by the Berlin psychiatrist Iwan Bloch (under the pseudonym 'Dr Eugen Duhren' to avoid controversy). The book was not published until 1905 and was banned in many countries due to its extreme sexual and violent nature.
The novel is set out to a strict timetable and for each of the first four months (November to February) prostitutes take turns telling five stories each day (relating to the fetishes of their most interesting clients) and thus totalling 150 stories for each month. These passions were separated into four categories - simple, complex, criminal and murderous - escalating in complexity and savagery:

November: the simple passions - these anecdotes are the only ones written in detail. They are only considered 'simple' in terms of them not including actual sexual penetration. However, most people would not regard them as simple because the clients mentioned in the anecdotes indulge in activities many would find bizarre or disgusting, such as men who like to masturbate in the faces of seven-year-old girls, who drink urine or eat excrement. As they do throughout the story-telling sections, the four libertines - Blangis, the Bishop, Curval and Durcet - indulge in activities similar to those they've heard with the kidnapped children and their daughters.

December: the complex passions - these anecdotes involve more extravagant perversions, such as men who vaginally rape female children, indulge in incest and flagellation. Tales of men who indulge in sacrilegious activities are also recounted, such as a man who enjoyed having sex with nuns whilst watching Mass being performed. (Like all his major characters, Sade was an atheist, and he himself indulged in an act of sacrilege when he paid a prostitute to trample on a crucifix, which led to one of his many arrests.) Sade was, however, well aware of the contradiction created by that of an atheist insulting a God he/she does not believe in, and this point is raised and discussed by the characters in a number of his works, although not this one. The female children are deflowered vaginally during the evening orgies with other elements of that month's stories - such as whipping - occasionally thrown in.

January: the criminal passions - tales are told of perverts who indulge in criminal activities, albeit stopping short of murder. They include men who sodomize girls as young as three, men who prostitute their own daughters to other perverts and watch the proceedings, and others who mutilate women by tearing off fingers or burning them with red-hot pokers. During the month, the four libertines begin having anal sex with the sixteen male and female children, and these children, and the other victims, are treated more brutally as time goes on, with regular beatings and whippings.

February: the murderous passions - the final 150 anecdotes are those involving murder. They include perverts who skin children alive, disembowel pregnant women, burn alive entire families and kill newborn babies in front of their mothers. The final tale is the only one since the simple passions of November written in detail. It features the 'Hell Libertine' who masturbates whilst watching fifteen teenage girls being simultaneously tortured to death. During this month, the libertines brutally kill three of the four daughters they have between them, along with four of the female children and two of the male ones. The murder of one of the girls, 15-year-old Augustine, is described in great detail, with the tortures she is subjected to including having flesh stripped from her limbs, her vagina being mutilated and her intestines being pulled out of her sliced-open belly and burned before her eyes.

Sade was interested in the manner in which sexual fetishes are developed, as are his primary characters, who urge the storytellers to remind them, in later stages, as to what the client in that particular anecdote enjoyed doing in their younger years. There are therefore a number of men who appear a number of times, such as a man who, in the early tales, enjoys pricking women's breasts with pins and, at his reappearance in the tales in the 'murderous passions' category, delights in killing women by raping them atop a bed of nails. It was this evident fascination with the manner in which the various off-shoots of sexual desire can manifest themselves in fetishes, which can be taken to the extreme, that lead to this work being equated with Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis. (Reference)

In Conclusion:
It is very disturbing that Sanjay Dadlani holds Marquis De Sade's book in such high esteem that he cut and pasted certain grotesque and sexually explicit passages (even relating to little girls) from it onto QuickTopic and attempted to do so anonymously. It is a fact that Sanjay Dadlani is into kinky, deviant and perverse sexual fetishes (which even include a Jesus Sex Fetish and an extreme Boot Sex Fetish). Sanjay ceaselessly refers to women as "sluts", "bitches" and "cunts" and views them as objects of sexual exploitation (Reference).

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani is the same person who pretends to be a Gaudiya Vaishnava and writes mushy-gushy slop on his Gaurasundara's Musing blog, praising God and acting like a pious devotee who does no wrong. Sanjay Dadlani is also one of the most vocal ex-devotees of Sathya Sai Baba who has received the full support, promotion and defence from the Anti-Sai Movement. Using Robert Priddy's logic (with a slight modification):

"Neither Robert Priddy or other Anti-Sai Activists have rejected Sanjay Dadlani as their spokesman on the Internet, and so one must conclude that in passively accepting his untruths, defamations, perversities and cover-up on their behalf, they are satisfied with him."

As I have said many times before, Anti-Sai Activist's alleged sensitivities to sexual abuse and exploitation are one huge pretense. They ignore their own member's despicable sexual behavior and sexual penchants (as they did with Reinier Van Der Sandt's admission to viewing child pornography) and put on sheep's clothing attempting to deceive the general public with their pseudo-moralistic public posturing and pretenses.

- Main Page For Sanjay Kishore Dadlani

- Sanjay Dadlani's Jesus Sex Fetish

- Sanjay Dadlani's Boot Sex Fetish

- What Kishore Dadlani Really Thinks Of Women

- Sanjay Dadlani's Gay Slurs On QuickTopic

- Sanjay's Sympathy For Terrorists And Murderers

- The Cow Hating Leather Fetishist

- SuicideGirls.com & The Gothic Vaishnava

- Sanjay's Satanic Inclinations

- Sanjay As The Angel Of Death: Azra`iL

- Proof Sanjay Dadlani Is Mentally Disturbed

- Psychologically Unstable Hip Hop Boy

- Psychopathy, Psychopaths & Psychopathic Behavior

Referenced from saisathyasai.com

Dadlani's Gay Slurs On QuickTopic

2007-04-06T09:46:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On February 23rd, two anonymous posts were made about me on the QuickTopic forum that stated:

Sathya Sai Baba: "It's about time Joe kept his regular 3 o'clock weekly appointment with me for his light refreshment. Oh how I love a bit of gay sex just before I go out for afternoon darshan and annoy people by not walking their way. The fools don't know that I'm busy fucking Joe in his hot little asshole and riding him like a bastard screaming for more. And then I blow my load of hot cum down his throat and Joe says YUM YUM" Reference

Swami says: "Suck my wang, Joe!" Reference

I immediately suspected that these posts were made by Sanjay Dadlani because he was the only Anti-Sai Activist who used the term "wang" before (in the same context) on the SSB2 Yahoo Group. Sanjay said:

"Sounds like you're an idiot who thinks only clibacy is the way to self-realization. Good luck dumbass, especially since your guru certainly gets his wang played with every day. That's a self-realised leela." (Reference)

Sanjay also happened to use the exact term "Yum Yum" on his killuminati blog. Sanjay said:

"But anyway, here's some tasty pictures of lead singer, Cristina Scabbia - the ultimate goth beauty. Yum yum." (Reference)

Now that I have access to the QuickTopic IPs, I can confirm that the IPs to these posts match the ones that Dadlani used on the QuickTopic Forum (Reference). As a matter of fact, Sanjay Dadlani (using the name "Sai Baba EXPOSED") posted under the 213.78 IP over a hundred times. The 213.78 IP also resolves directly to Sanjay Dadlani's known Internet Service Provider (Onetel).

As I have often said, these are the sexually focused deviants and perverts who are attempting to "expose" Sathya Sai Baba. They willfully, purposely and deceptively use numerous fake names and identities to defame Sai Baba, Sai devotees and Sai proponents. Sanjay Dadlani was previously exposed for his Jesus Sex Fetish and Boot Sex Fetish. Sanjay Dadlani has now been exposed once again for his graphic homosexual fantasies involving me having gay sex with Sathya Sai Baba and apparently relishing the imagery! Sanjay even posted under the name "Marquis de Sade" and submitted sexual quotes from 120 Days of Sodom (Ref: 01 - 02 - 03).

It should come as no surprise then that Sanjay Dadlani also made the following posts:

Kick his head in: "bastard sai baba" Reference

Kick his head in: "and kill him." Reference

Anti-Sai Activist's make the case for me that they are a bunch of hateful, angry and vindictive people who wage vicious smear campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba. Ex-devotees used to boast "The Truth Will Prevail!" Well, the "truth" is prevailing and it's not in their favor.

Relevant Links
- Main Page For Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look
- Ekantik Expert About 'Barebacking'
- Sanjay's Incestuous Homoeroticism
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion
- Move Over He-Man - Here Comes He-Krsna!
- Dream About Sanjay
- "Effeminancy" On Wikipedia?
- Sanjay Worships Pink, Girly & Gay Gods
- Bhaktivedanta Manor, Sanjay Dadlani And 3G
- Sanjay's Pink G-String
- Pink Is In. Sanjay Isn't.

Referenced From: saisathyasai.com

Ekantik Expert About 'Barebacking'

2007-03-12T23:04:00.000-07:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

"Ekantik" (aka Sanjay Dadlani) made an amusing edit on Wikipedia about Unprotected Sex and Barebacking.

Apparently, now Sanjay is an expert on homosexual sex and said:

Yep, I agree. Plus barebacking appears to be more concerned with homosexual anal sex whereas the term "unprotected sex" mostly refers to heterosexual sex especially when considering the contraction of HIV/AIDS. So this article should be kept separate and expanded beyond stub-class. (Reference)

On a side-note, Sanjay abruptly stopped posting under his username "Sai Baba EXPOSED" on the QuickTopic forum. Someone posting under the guise of anonymity made several homosexual sexual slurs against me. The first slur read:

"Suck my wang, Joe! Ref

The second slur said:

"It's about time Joe kept his regular 3 o'clock weekly appointment with me for his light refreshment. Oh how I love a bit of gay sex just before I go out for afternoon darshan and annoy people by not walking their way. The fools don't know that I'm busy fucking Joe in his hot little asshole and riding him like a bastard screaming for more. And then I blow my load of hot cum down his throat and Joe says YUM YUM" Ref

Since I was not familiar with the term "wang" (as used in the context above) I decided to research it. It should come as no surprise that the only Anti-Sai Activist who has used the term "wang" (in the same context) is Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (the fully exposed pervert, boot fetishist and Jesus-sex fetishist). See For Yourself. Sanjay also happened to use the exact same term "Yum Yum" on his killuminati blog, just like user did above. See For Yourself.

Couple all of this with Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look and things begin to smell very fishy.

This is the guy who is dominating the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Articles with his biased and negative point of view.

MAJOR UPDATE:
Just as I suspected, Sanjay did make the homosexual slurs cited earlier:
Dadlani's Gay Slurs On QuickTopic

Ekantiks Bogus Credentials On Wikipedia

2007-03-10T23:04:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

In light of the latest Wikipedia scandal concerning EssJay (Ryan Jordan) who claimed to be a Professor of Theology with two PhDs (since proven to be a ridiculous lie), it is amusing to note that Sanjay Kishore Dadlani, aka "Ekantik", decided to correct his blatant lie and bogus credentials stating that he possessed a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Networking.

On February 22nd 2007 (17 days ago) Sanjay changed the wording on his user-page from saying:

I am an undergraduate psychology student and I eventually aim to contribute information to science-oriented articles.

To →

I earned a BSc. Computer Networking and now taking an BSc. Psychology, eventually aiming to contribute information to science-oriented articles. (Reference)

Sanjay wanted to convince and deceive others so strongly that he possessed a BSc in Computer Networking that on February 23rd 2007 he added a user-box making that exact same claim (Reference).

Shortly after the Wikipedia scandal broke regarding Essjay, Sanjay decided to do some damage control and corrected his fraudulent claim that he possessed a BSc in Computer Networking. On March 6th 2007, Sanjay edited his userpage and changed the "earned" statement back to "studying" (Reference). On March 9th 2007, User:Ekantik (aka Sanjay Dadlani) changed his userbox stating he had a Bachelor's Degree in Computer Networking to claiming he is simply attending a University (Reference).

Other highly questionable claims by "Ekantik" are his alleged ability to write HTML, write XHTML, program in JavaScript, program in Pascal, program in BASIC and program in C.

The reasons why I seriously doubt that Sanjay knows how to write/program in any of the computer languages listed above are because:

Sanjay / Ekantik had difficulty in learning and using basic HTML tags on the QuickTopic forum.

Sanjay / Ekantik made very amusing editing errors generated on his blog because of his unfamiliarity with it.

Sanjay / Ekantik made erroneous comments about .htaccess and robots.txt files on the SSB2 Yahoo Group, which someone with fundamental knowledge about computers would not make.

Sanjay / Ekantik whined and hissed about the public exposure of his killuminati blog, which he claimed was a "private" blog (despite the fact that it was public domain and even had several Google caches on the internet). Obviously, Sanjay did not know how to make his blog private (which is done by editing the HTML with one meta-tag).

Sanjay / Ekantik apparently unaware and unfamiliar with how affiliate logs work, linked his GaudiyaDiscussions.com affiliate ID to his deviant and private StreetBitches Blog. Of course, anyone with a remedial understanding of hot-linking knows that such an action would divulge the website URL to the webmaster. Sanjay didn't know this.

Sanjay / Ekantik apparently unaware and unfamiliar with how IPs and IP tracking work, left a long list of his IP activity on my website, directly linking him to his secret and private StreetBitches Blog. I was able to identify him as the owner to this blog and now Sanjay uses anonymous proxy servers to view my website (even though I can still track activity to proxy-server websites).

Anyone who knows how to program or write in the computer languages listed above would not display such formidable ignorance about computers, as Sanjay has done. Of course, Sanjay Dadlani (aka "ekantik" aka "gaurasundara") has a long and established history of telling pathological lies.

I hope the new proposition for credential verification will further expose Sanjay/Ekantik as a liar and a deceiver on Wikipedia.

Sathya Sai Baba

2007-03-04T10:28:00.000-08:00

New Blog: Sathya Sai Baba On Wordpress

A comprehensive blog with listings to various articles pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba and the Sai Controversy.

Wikipedia, Ekantik, Mel Etitis And Peter J King

2007-02-20T14:51:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Mel Etitis Menu (click on a link to go to relevant section):
Why This Page Was Created
Introduction To Mel Etitis
Mel Etitis Created The Sockpuppet "Peter J King"
Who Created The "Peter J. King" Wiki-Page?
Mel Etitis, Peter J. King And The Andrea Christofidou Connection
Peter J. King Writes About "Mel Etitis"
Mel Etitis, Peter J. King And His Book "One Hundred Philosophers"
The Mel Etitis Sockpuppet Cover-Up On Wikipedia
In Conclusion

Why This Page Was Created:
Return To Menu

This page was created because my voice was taken away on Wikipedia (I was banned) and I felt the necessity to defend my claims that not only did Mel Etitis create a sockpuppet using his real name, it most certainly appears that he also created and heavily edited his own Wikipedia biography page (which is frowned upon by Wikipedia). Since User:Ekantik and Mel Etitis have both made what I consider misleading statements about the ban (Refs: 01 02 - 03 - 04), I decided to give my side of the story. Here it is:

Introduction To Mel Etitis:
Return To Menu

There are several Anti-Wikipedia websites that discuss administrators on Wikipedia who have earned reputations as being "elitists", "egotists" and "power abusers". One of these administrators is the user "Mel Etitis" (Ref). I first encountered Mel Etitis when he erroneously removed citation tags (thrice) from the Robert Priddy wiki-page, for which he could provide no reliable citations (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03). I confronted Mel Etitis about his removal of these citation tags (Ref) and he re-added one of the citation tags back into the article (Ref). Needless to say, Mel Etitis and I butted heads a couple of times thereafter. Then, Mel Etitis threatened to ban me (Ref) for making the following comment:

"Smee, since you are so familiar with Wikipedia policies, then why don't you source the material you are adding to the article from reliable and reputable sources? Surely you know what those policies are? Don't you? No one, not even you, can provide even one single reliable or reputable source to reference any of the material on Priddy's page. Most of the information on the page must be taken on the word of Robert Priddy (who created his own page) because it has not been published anywhere else. For one so conversant with Wikipedia policies, your edits are duplicitous." (Reference)

Because I called "Smee's" edits "duplicitous", Mel Etitis raised a huge fuss and threatened to ban me (despite Mel Etitis' well known snobbery and condescending remarks made to others). I fail to see how my comment was inappropriate considering "Smee's continual reference to Wikipedia policies but flagrant dismissal of WP:RS and WP:BLP. The conversation between Mel and I went as follows: Mel Etitis → Me → Mel Etitis → Me → the conversation ended.

Ekantik (aka Sanjay Dadlani: a vicious defamer against me outside Wikipedia who could not substantiate any of his libels against me, even when publicly challenged on the RFA to do so: Ref) complained to Mel Etitis about factual comments I made about him in relation to his off-topic comments made about Sai Devotees (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06). Mel Etitis promptly banned me and said:

"This has to end. I'm blocking you for 12 hours as a shot across your bows, in the hope that you'll use the time to calm down. If you continue as you have been, the next block will be considerably longer." (Reference)

Since Mel Etitis was never a party to the RFA and was never involved in (and hence unfamiliar with) the controversy between User:Ekantik and I, I decided to do some research about Mel Etitis and I discovered he used a sockpuppet (using his real name) on Wikipedia.

Mel Etitis Created The Sockpuppet "Peter J King":
Return To Menu

Mel Etitis created his account on December 29th 2004 and created his Peter J King sockpuppet on January 13th 2007, after he was an admin and should have known better.

After a few minutes of research on Google, I discovered a "Windows Live Spaces" (henceforth referred to as "WLS") site belonging to Peter J. King (Reference). Mel Etitis and Peter J. King:

Both are 50 years old (Mel Etitis stated his age on his user-page and Peter King did the same on his WLS site).

Both teach at Oxford in relation to Philosophy.

Both have made disparaging remarks about Wikipedia in the same tone (compare: Point 5 entitled "Philosophy" with "gone to Citizendium").

Both have the same tastes in music, especially Jazz (compare: Mel Etitis' music contributions with Peter J. King's music selections).

Both have very similar gardens pictures (compare WLS garden pics with Mel Etitis' garden pic on wikipedia).

However, the real clincher is that both Peter J King and Mel Etitis claimed the exact same picture of ''All Saint's Churchill'' as his own:

BELOW: Peter J. King's "All Saint's Churchill" Picture On WLS That He Claimed He Photographed Himself:

BELOW: Met Etitis' "All Saint's Churchill" Picture On Wikipedia That He Claimed He Photographed Himself:

Within two hours of making my sockpuppetry claim against Mel Etitis, the WLS picture in question was promptly deleted and replaced with a different picture (further proof, in my opinion, that Mel Etitis is the owner of Peter J. King's WLS site). Needless to say, I foresaw that Mel Etitis (aka "Peter J. King") would attempt to do damage control and I screencaptured the picture when I had the opportunity.

Who Created The "Peter J. King" Wiki-Page?:
Return To Menu

Looking at the edit history for the Peter J. King article, an AOL user intimately familiar with Peter J. King created the page (while making other edits dealing exclusively with philosophy and promoting links to Peter J. King's websites: 1 - 2) and edited it under multiple IPs.

Call it "coincidence", but Mel Etitis happens to be an AOL user and he purposely divulged his AOL IP (172.201.50.164) and Oxford IP (163.1.2.96) while not logged in to Wikipedia:

Ref: 01 - 02 - 03 and Admission

The Oxford IP, which Mel Etitis divulged as his own, was deceptively used to vent about the Andrea Christofidou page (which was nominated for deletion). This same Oxford IP also edited the Peter J. King page. Nevertheless, Mel Etitis claimed that he "hardly touched" the Peter J. King article (Ref) and said my comments about him being Peter J. King were "unfounded" (Ref). This evidence proves that Mel Etitis lied.

Mel Etitis also edited Peter J. King's wiki-page under his admin name of "Mel Etitis":

Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05

In addition to the previous Oxford University IP (which Mel Etitis divulged as his own), the Peter J. King page was also edited under the following Oxford University IPs (where Mel Etitis claims he works):

129.67.97.225 (contribs): 01 - 02 - 03
163.1.2.96 (contribs): 01

The following Oxford University IP (where Mel Etitis claims he works) wrote "childish vandalism" in the edit summary for This Ref. Needless to say, "childish vandalism" is a common phrase used by Mel Etitis (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06).

163.1.43.104 (contribs)

It is important to note that AOL IPs are static (i.e., the numbers change), anonymous and mostly resolve to the USA (even though the user may reside outside the USA). The following AOL IPs were heavily involved in the Peter J. King, Adrea Christofidou and Philosophy articles (and happen to be subjects that Mel Etitis is very much interested in):

Aol 1 - Aol 2 - Aol 3 - Aol 4 - Aol 5 - Aol 6 - Aol 7 - Aol 8 - Aol 9

- Aol 1 posted "Category: Atheist philosophers" on many pages (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18). Go figure, Mel Etitis is an Atheist (Ref). Aol 1 participated in the Andrea Christofidou request for deletion dispute (just like Mel Etitis and his self-divulged Oxford University IP did) and added her name to a couple of pages.

- Aol 2 deals exclusively with Peter J. King and Andrea Christofidou. One of the edits added two links to Peter J. King's website (Ref)

- Aol 3 deals exclusively with Andrea Christofidou and this editor knew facts about her that could only be known by a close associate of hers (Ref).

- Aol 4 deals exclusively with Andrea Christofidou.

- Aol 5 deals exclusively with Andrea Christofidou and the editor responded to a comment made specifically to Peter King (Ref).

- Aol 6 deals primarily with Andrea Christofidou with one edit in "philosophy", providing an external link going to Peter J. King's website (Ref). Another edit divulged the fact that the editor is associated with Oxford (Ref).

- Aol 7 deals exclusively with Peter J. King.

- Aol 8 deals exclusively with Peter J. King.

- Aol 9 deals with Peter J. King, Pembroke College, Oxford and Constantine P. Cavafy. The editor added a link going to Peter J. King's website on the Constatine P. Cavafy page (Ref).

152.71.20.183 is also another known IP for Mel Etitis.

Strange enough, another Wikipedian was also under the impression that Mel Etitis was "Peter J. King" but seemed confused about an edit that Mel Etitis made and felt he was mistaken about his true identity (Refs: 01 - 02). Mel Etitis never denied being Peter J. King (Ref).

Mel Etitis, Peter J. King And The Andrea Christofidou Connection:
Return To Menu

Andrea Christofidou and Peter J. King are very close associates and have worked together translating poetry (Ref). View the Edit History for the Andrea Christofidou page and Mel Etitis heavily contributed to the page (along with edits made from the Oxford University IP 163.1.43.104, which contains the "childish vandalism" edit summary discussed earlier). Mel Etitis also spearheaded the fight to keep the Christofidou page when it was nominated for deletion (Ref). Mel Etitis wanted anonymous votes to be counted (wouldn't all those AOL IPs and Oxford University IPs come in handy?). The reason why Mel Etitis wanted anonymous votes to be counted was because he was venting anonymously under his Oxford IP 163.1.2.96. Mel Etitis divulged that this IP was his (Ref) and he could have deceptively used this IP (Ref) to cast a vote if it was allowed. Let us read the *ahem* "civil" and "non-attacking" comments added to the page under Mel Etitis' self-divulged Oxford University IP:

"I've just discovered this discussion; the usual Usenet-level stuff, with dogmatic nonsense from anonymous, ignorant, arrogant little nobodies. Andrea would be upset by some of the crass comments, but then I don't suppose you really understand taht, you autistic creeps. Take the page down; why would she be interested in having n edited duplicate of the bio from her own page on a non-peer-reviewed "Encyclopedia"? I expect that the person who started putting it up had the best of motives, but take it down please, and leave these autistic twerps to play their dominance games with each other. --[A friend and colleague of A.C.] 9.25am 31st December 2004" (Reference)

Under the Oxford University IP (that Mel Etitis divulged as his own), he said he was a "friend and colleague of A.C." (just like Peter J. King). The condescending, sarcastic and puerile comments about autistic people are shameful and offensive.

Peter J. King Writes About "Mel Etitis":
Return To Menu

"Mel Etitis" is a fictional name used by Peter J. King in philosophical dialogues he published on the internet on his older Oxford website (or view archive). Peter J. King wrote about the character "Mel Etitis" (whom he described as "another admirer, careful and studious") under "My Bit" → "Philosophical Pieces" →

The Problem of Evil (or view archive).

Morality and Religion: I (or view archive).

Peter King's older website has a link that goes to his newer Oxford website. As far as I am aware, no literature, reference or person has referred to "Mel Etitis" besides the Wikipedia Mel Etitis and Peter J. King. They are the only ones who have used that name. No one else has.

Now where did the Wikipedia user "Mel Etitis" get his name from? He tells us:

"I took the name 'Mel Etitis' from some on-line dialogues on the philosophy of religion; the original Greek word has been distorted to make it look like a name, but it means something like 'one who studies'" (Ref).

The "on-line dialogues" came from (you guessed it) Peter J. King.

Mel Etitis, Peter J. King And His Book "One Hundred Philosophers":
Return To Menu

Mel Etitis promoted links going directly to Peter J. King's personal websites (01, 02). Or view the full list.

Mel Etitis created the disambiguation page for Peter King (Ref).

Mel Etitis referenced Peter J. King's book on the Feng Youlan page (Ref).

Met Etitis added Peter J. King's name to Brasenose College Oxford page (Ref).

Mel Etitis added a link to Peter J. King's website on the Al Farabi page (Ref).

Mel Etitis created a page on Ann Conway and cited Peter J. King (Ref).

Mel Etitis referenced Peter J. King on the Euthyphro Dilemma page (Ref).

Mel Etitis created the Kwasi Wiredu page and added Peter J. King's book for futher reading (Ref).

Mel Etitis added a link to Peter J. King's website in the external links on the Of Miracle page (Ref).

Mel Etitis added Peter J. King's book as a source on the Scottish School of Common Sense page (Ref).

Mel Etitis added Peter J. King's book as a source on the Wang Fuzhi page (Ref).

Mel Etitis added an external link to Peter J. King's website on the Divine Command Theory page (Ref) and on the talk page (Ref).

Mel Etitis added Peter J. King's book as a source on the Al-Kindi page (Ref).

Mel Etitis added an external link to Peter J. King's website on the Adi Shankara page (Ref).

The Mel Etitis Sockpuppet Cover-Up On Wikipedia:
Return To Menu

This section deals with the primary reason for my ban. Because I discovered the information already discussed above about Mel Etitis, I told him that he had a conflict of interest with the Peter J. King article and relevant sockpuppet (Ref).

Because I said this, other admins came to Mel Etitis' rescue. I was told user "Hipocrite":

"Speculating on, or attempting to discern the real-life name of contributors is a violation of WP:HARASS. You should consider this your first and final warning. Do not engage in this sort of behavior again." (Reference)

My response to user "Hipocrite":

"Regarding your comment on my talk page, it is not speculation. I can back it up with verifiable facts. I find it strange that an Admin knowingly used a sockpuppet and appears to have created his own userpage. Both frowned upon by Wikipedia." (Reference)

User "Hipocrite" responded by saying:

"If you have evidence of sockpuppetry, present it at WP:ANI. Your threats must stop, now." (Reference)

Therefore, I filed a sockpuppetry claim (Ref) just as user "Hipocrite" directed me to. In less than an hour's time, user "Musical Linguist" deleted my sockpuppetry claim (Ref), removed my sockpuppet templates (01 - 02 - 03) and banned me from Wikipedia simply for following the directions given to me by "Hypocrite".

User "Musical Linguist" block said:

"Constant public speculation (after warning) about identity of admin who blocked him. Take time to read WP:HARASS. If you're prepared to follow it, leave a note on your talk page. Further speculation will lead to page protection."

This was the reason why I was banned. Although I was given an opportunity to have the ban lifted (by closing my eyes to the truth and acquiescing to the specified terms), I already decided to disengage from Wikipedia (Refs: 01 - 02) due to the never-ending debates with ex-devotees who unremittingly dictate content on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia articles. I have now joined the growing number of people who have become fed up with Wikipedia's cover-ups, bias, double-standards, edit wars and POV-pushers.

In Conclusion:
Return To Menu

I think Mel Etitis (as well as other admins) should be held to very same standards and policies that all other Wikipedians are held to. No excuses. No cover-ups. Period.

Return To Top Menu

Referenced From Sai-Fi.net

Ekantik, Gaurasundara And Sanjay Dadlani

2007-02-10T10:52:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani systematically attacked me regarding my involvement on Wikipedia (in relation to the Sathya Sai Baba articles) for many months. Not only did Sanjay attack me on the SSB2 Yahoo Group, he created a blog (named "wikimoreno") that specifically targeted me based soley on my involvement with Wikipedia.

I first became aware of the Wikipedia user "Ekantik" back in September 2006 when he secretly and deceptively attempted to get Freelanceresearch (Lisa DeWitt) banned from Wikipedia behind her back (Refs: See Green Segments: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06). I immediately suspected an Anti-Sai Activist and informed Lisa about it.

On November 19th 2006, Sanjay created the user-name "Gaurasundara" (a name he uses, and has used, on numerous forums and blogs). He created this user-name to vote to keep Robert Priddy's user-page (Ref). Since Sanjay only made two edits (at that time) under the name "Gaurasundara", I didn't give him too much attention and soon forgot about him.

Not too long thereafter, Ekantik began editing the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia article and immediately began attempting to bully me by repeatedly accusing me of using Wikipedia as a "battleground", "soapbox", etc., and began flaunting Wikipedia policy in my face like he was some sort of Admin. Consequently, knowing Ekantik's past history with Lisa, I decided to research his edits (which anyone can do at any time because one's edits are public domain).

Based on Ekantik's edits, it became very clear that "Ekantik" was into Gaudiya Vaishnavism and I immediately suspected he was Sanjay. I noticed that he added AC BhaktiVedanta Prabhupada as a "Notable person of the 20th century" (Ref), added "motorhead" on the same article (Ref) and made an edit regarding Lemmy Kilmister (Ref). Since Sanjay devoted an entire blog to Motorhead and Lemmy Kilmister (named "WhoreHouse Blog") and is a Gaudiya Vaishnava (with a blog named Gaurasundara's Musings and is an editor on Gaudiya Kutir Wiki), this all but convinced me that "Ekantik" was Sanjay. I promptly emailed Lisa with my suspicions although I still had some doubts because "Ekantik" claimed he had a basic speaking command of Telugu, French, German and Italian (which Sanjay never publicly professed knowing before).

Then I discovered two edits that confirmed my suspicions. Sanjay changed his name from "Ekantik" to "Gaurasundara" on two separate occasions (Refs: See Green Sections: 01 - 02). I promptly confronted Sanjay with these edits and filed a sockpuppetry claim against him on Wikipedia. After filing my complaint, Sanjay immediately went into a frenzy and attempted to do damage control by changing his name on his "Gaurasundara's Musing" blog from "Gaurasundara das" (a name he has used since August 2005) to "Dark Knight".

After counting his losses, Sanjay reverted his name back to "Gaurasundara das" and admitted on Wikipedia that he was using the sockpuppet-name of "Gaurasundara" (Ref). Sanjay clearly attempted to pass himself off as two separate editors (he even greeted his "Gaurasundara" sockpuppet with his Ekantik account: Ref). How's that for deception?

Further sticking his foot in his mouth, Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Ekantik" aka "Gaurasundara") claimed, while incognito, that he was not a POV (point of view) editor (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03) and claimed that the primary reason he began participating on the Sathya Sai Baba article was based soley because of various Requests For Comment (Ref).

Of course, these are blatant lies. Sanjay has a wholly critical and negative POV about Sathya Sai Baba (unremittingly referring to him, even to this day, as a "homosexual paedophile" 01, "faggot guru child rapist" 02, "murderer" 03, among numerous other defamatory slurs and libels). Sanjay had been keeping watch over the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article for many months and often criticized me about my edits there. Sanjay attempted to portray himself as someone who was not involved in the Sai Controversy and engaged me in debate incognito. When I revealed Ekantik/Gaurasundara's name as "Sanjay Kishore Dadlani", he threw one of his typical flaming, shrieking and girly hissy-fits, frothing at the mouth and posting all sorts of warnings on my user-page. Boo hoo!

Keeping in tune with Sanjay's pornographic inclinations, he put the following quote about pornography on his userpage:

"Wikipedia is one of two good things on the internet. The other is porn." ~CaughtThinking (Ref)

Sanjay also has a userbox that states "This user rejects any violence towards women." Now read my article about What Sanjay Really Thinks Of Women and how he continually refers to women as "sluts" and "bitches". As a matter of fact, Sanjay made the following comments about women:

Fucking bitches, they owe me something. And every day that passes ain't helping their fucking case. Oh boy, am I getting madder and madder by the day. Oh boy, am I gonna burn them alive or what?

Fucking women, I decided today that I think all "hot" women fucking can go fuck themselves. Fucking snotty bitches, fucking little teasers, they can go die. Little bitches, brought up as sluts. fucking shitty females, my ass. They can go die.

Women as a whole are really starting to piss me off. Why don't they just go and fuck off? You either get "hot" women who prance about thinking that they're all that and how incredibly lucky you are to even be in their presence, or you get the ugly bitches whose tongues hang out for you all over the floor.

Usually I treat girls like the fucking sluts that they ARE.

Not only did Sanjay make these comments, he created a StreetBitches Blog where he stalked women and filmed them with his digicam under tables and up their dresses and which was aptly entitled "They Want It: Everywhere I Look, I See Bitches". Needless to say, another webmaster (a Gaudiya Vaishnava often praised by Sanjay) also caught Sanjay engaged in his deviant behavior on the StreetBitches Blog and wrote an email for me to forward to University officials to support my claims.

Sanjay believes that because I used the word "poo", I have some sort of "fascination for faecal material" and am a "toilet sex pervert". Well, Sanjay apparently suffers from the same "fascination for faecal material" and is a "toilet sex pervert" becuase he often uses the words "shit" and "bullshit". I discussed this in my blogged article entitled Sanjay's Disgusting Feces Obsession. Funny enough, Sanjay has a user-box on his user-page that states:

This person does not understand Bullshit (or understands it with considerable difficulties or does not wish to communicate in Bullshit).

As a matter of fact, the "bullshit" user-box was the first user-box that Sanjay included on his user-page (Ref). Sanjay, what is that again about people having "fascinations for faecal material" and being "toilet sex perverts" for simply using words that refer to feces?

And to top it all off, Sanjay openly professed being filled with bitterness and poison, having a serious drinking problem, being scared that he was becoming "unstable and psychotic" (Ref), having a Jesus-Sex-Fetish (01 - 02) and wondered about cutting his flesh with razors and thought it would be "quaintly romantic" to purchase a gun, put it in his mouth, lick the barrel with his tongue and blow his brains out (Ref).

It is nothing short of absurd to think that the one of the most vocal defamers of Sri Sathya Sai Baba is free of ulterior motives and is dedicated to neutrality on Wikipedia in relation to Sai Baba. Funny enough, that is exactly what Sanjay (aka "Ekantik" aka "Gaurasundara") wants others to believe.

I don't believe it or buy it for one second.

The "Photographic Evidence" Lie

2007-02-08T11:04:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Bogus Sekharji “Photographic Evidence” Claim

Beginning in the year 2002, several Ex-Devotees (specifically Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O'Clery and Robert Priddy) erroneously and falsely claimed that there is “photographic evidence” in existence of Sathya Sai Baba allegedly engaged in sexual acts.

The so-called “photographic evidence” rumor was originally started by a guru-wannabee named “Sekharji” (real name “Chandrasekhar Balasubramanian”) who carefully primps his hair and wears an orange gown to make himself look like Sathya Sai Baba (click thumbnail to enlarge):

The Sai Guru Wannabee: "Sekharji"

Sekharji sent the following post to Ex-Devotees:

Sekharji: “Today, there are so many Extortionists, that SSB is letting most of them go on telling stories without the reward for silence. It seems that the money supply is now getting low. So now, there are a whole lot of exDevotees attacking each Other to achieve the status as being the last One standing for SSB to deal with. There are even Imposters planted to help confuse and frighten the whistleblowers. I enforce My claim for the previous statements to You in the following way.

here is a Swamiji named ‘Kaleshwara’ somewhere near Banglore. He was a young Boy when SSB molested Him. He, however, brought a camera and took pictures of the activites without SSB knowing. Later, He extorted SSB and got $1 million dollars to start His own ashram. Go to Him in Banglore, and privately ask. He is quite open and honest about the whole matter. He may still even show You the pictures as He did to many Others.

Sekharji - 06-28-2002 08:43 PM ET (US)

There are several profound problems with Sekharji’s claims:

First of all, Swami Kaleshwar has never lived “somewhere near Bangalore” and his ashram is not in Bangalore, Karnataka. Kaleshwar’s ashram is in Penukonda, Andhra Pradesh (250kms away from Bangalore and in another state). Therefore, Sekharji’s information about Swami Kaleshwar is wholly incorrect and is therefore highly suspect.

Secondly, Sekharji never said that he saw the alleged pictures himself, first-hand. Sekharji simply repeated a rumor and gossip he allegedly heard.

Lastly, why would Kaleshwar publicly admit that he blackmailed and extorted $1 million from Sathya Sai Baba when extortion and blackmail are illegal and criminal acts punishable with incarceration and/or hefty fines?

How can anyone believe anything Sekharji (a Sathya Sai competitor) has to say when he disseminated total disinformation about Kaleshwar?

As if Sekharji’s claims were not ridiculous enough, Robert Priddy (an Ex-Devotee) actually had the audacity to say (click thumbnail to enlarge):

saibaba-x.org.uk/6/saisex4.htm
Robert Priddy: “I have ascertained that both prints and a negative of this former student engaged in oral sex with Sathya Sai Baba are extant and will eventually be made public in the appropriate legal setting.”

Why should Robert Priddy wait for a legal setting? Why not anonymously send the alleged pictures to the Indian Media or publish them anonymously on YouTube as has been done with Swami Nithyananda? What faster way to bring down Sathya Sai Baba than by publishing the alleged photos? One video of Swami Nithyananda engaged in questionable behavior was enough to bring him down completely. What are Ex-Devotees waiting for?

Robert Priddy himself claimed that he personally “ascertained that both prints and a negative of this former student engaged in oral sex with Sathya Sai Baba are extant”. Robert Priddy is a pathological liar of the worst order and is a total fraud adept in peddling rumors and gossips as the “irrefutable truth”. Robert Priddy never saw the alleged pictures and therefore never “ascertained” anything.

Whenever anyone demands evidence or proof from Robert Priddy, he flares his nostrils, reddens his cheeks, bulges his eyeballs and shrieks shrilly at the top of his voice “confidentiality”, “in a legal setting”, “only to bona fide investigators”, etc. However, when it comes to Sai Devotees or Pro-Sai Activists, Robert Priddy demands evidence, proof and explanations from them that can never meet his expectations.

Ex-Devotees had every opportunity (and still do) to give the alleged pictures to the BBC and/or various other journalists sympathetic with their cause. To Date: No one has EVER done so. Why not? Because the “$1 Million Picture Extortion” story is $1 million fraud. That’s why.

It is also amusing to note how Robert Priddy referred to Swami Kaleshwar as a “former student”. Swami Kaleshwar was never a former student at Sathya Sai Baba’s Colleges and Robert Priddy cannot provide a scintilla of credible evidence to the contrary.

Sanjay Dadlani & Tony O’Clery Weigh In:

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/45454
Sanjay Dadlani: I’ve noticed that you pro-SB people are in complete denial of the fact that we have photographic evidence of SB molesting a child. Oh well, so be it. :-)

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/42227
Sanjay Dadlani: We even have photographic proof of his sexual molestation, which is red-hot proof that he is a sex abuser.

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/40041
Sanjay Dadlani: There is photographic proof of Sai baba performing oral sex on an ex-student. I don't know if it is Sai Baba who is the giver or the receiver, but oral sex is definitely involved in this photogrpahic evidence. When it finally becomes available, I wonder how the braindead devotees will react to it?

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/45339
Tony O’Clery: There is some kind of a photo...

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/45337
Tony O’Clery: Namaste, The photo exists. It was taken long before the easy internet photo editing, so I don't know the forensics of it. I have talked to Premanand about this, and indicated to him that it wouldn't be available for his law suit due to the ever present danger to the owner. This is what I understand........Tony

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/33930
Tony O’Clery: HOWEVER I KNOW FOR SURE THAT A CERTAIN PERSON HAS PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF SB MOLESTING!! He is at present too scared to release it for it would mean an certain death sentence and he lives in India, the prashanti goons would get him for sure, as they have so many others.

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/33961
Tony O’Clery: Namaste, You know cameras can be coin size now with wide lenses. I don't know the exact format used but the photos or whatever do exist, believe me and have done for a couple of years. They will come out eventually, now it is too dangerous for the boy he and his parents would be murdered by sb's goons from the prashanti mafia, or the pn police......Tony.

(QuickTopic Forum, post 1728)
Tony O’Clery: Namaste, I have it on good authority that there is a photo of sb molesting a boy. However the parents are still devotees and the boy is frightened for his life if his name is revealed. His name has been passed on to a safe place in case he is murdered by sb or his gang of goons...Tony.

Notice how Robert Priddy, Sanjay Dadlani and Tony O’Clery cannot keep their stories straight and consistent? The alleged “victim” is changed from Swami Kaleshwar to an anonymous “former student” by Robert Priddy. The anonymous “former student” is then changed to an anonymous “child” by Sanjay Dadlani. The anonymous “child” is then changed to an anonymous “boy” whose parents are still Sai Devotees by Tony O’Clery. Notice how Swami Kaleshwar is completely filtered out of the story and he is replaced with an anonymous former student / child / boy whose story must be guarded out of safety concerns and confidentiality. What a bunch of rubbish!

Sanjay Dadlani first claimed that Anti-Sai Activists are in actual possession of the pictures. Then Sanjay Dadlani claimed that he did not know who was the “giver or the receiver” in the pictures (meaning he and other ex-devotees never saw them)!

Similarly, Tony O’Clery has never (admittedly) seen the alleged “photographic evidence” for himself. Tony O’Clery is simply perpetuating unverifiable rumors and gossips. Tony O’Clery has no information whatsoever about the alleged picture(s) and said that there is “some kind of photo” in existence. How’s that for objective? Tony O’Clery also alleged that the picture was “taken long before the easy internet photo editing”. This simply is untrue. Photo fraud has a long history that can be traced back prior to Sathya Sai Baba’s birth. For example, the famous Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the Cottingley Fairies case of photographic fraud going back to the early 1920’s.

This is the type of typical sleaze that Ex-Devotee’s peddle and perpetuate against Sathya Sai Baba.

Objective & Verifiable Information About Swami Kaleshwar

Paula Gloria released some YouTube videos of Swami Kaleshwar in which a full-sized picture of Sathya Sai Baba could clearly be seen in Kaleshwar’s ashram in Penukonda (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03). Seeing is believing:

Swami Kaleshwar With A Garlanded Photo Of Sathya Sai Baba In His Mandir, Next To A Photo Of Shirdi Sai Baba And Himself

As one can see, Swami Kaleshwar has a garlanded photo of Sathya Sai Baba in his ashram. Why would an alleged sexual molestation victim keep a photo of his sexual abuser in his ashram and put flower garlands on it? Once again, another Anti-Sai rumor bites the dust.

Barbara Dent & Sanjay Dadlani

2007-02-01T14:53:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Barbara Dent (the Christian Whacko attacking Sathya Sai Baba), has become "buddy buddy" with Sanjay. Funny enough, Sanjay is completely deaf and mute to Barbara's psycho-babble, racism and past-life mumbo-jumbo.

Not only has Barbara Dent recently claimed that the Nazi's were aliens, she also claimed that she recalled past lives in World War II in which I was allegedly a "Jew Killer" and a "Nazi" and that Sanjay was a Jew who owned a newspaper that spoke against Hitler, etc. Barabara is also racist against black people. Barbara Dent-Walton said on the QuickTopic forum:

"EXPOSING the lying fucking or should I say non-fucking IMPOTENT WHORE called JOE JACKASS MORENO once more...So Jackass Joe, wanna' keep it up? Pitiful slut that can't even talk or walk straight up! Bent over queer! Is dying fun?...Har-har. Guess you won't be raping no children anymore. No wonder you had to accuse Barry Pittard of such an evil thing, you diabolical raping pedophile whorel!

Steal rubies and diamonds from all those Jews come again, who know who you are and where you try and hang out--in the same dirty old dump of whoring hate called your filthy old mind! Who doesn't hate your guts, pig boy? The whole world of real people really do hate your guts and wish you were dead...You are such a lazy and worthless, demonically insane, gross-looking gay, and pathetic old queer...Got any memory of your vicious days of being the same bastard back at Auschwitz death camps during your favorite time, called the Nazi fag Regeim? I sure the hell remember you, ghastly freak, for I hated your queer vile and Satanically possessed butt back then, as much as I still do today...

Guess who I so-called 'married' for a time? One of your best friends of the Nazi Regeim. Guess why I did it? To catch out the faggot for the very final time. Remember me from those good old Aushwitz days of evil. No? Not yet? Too afraid to look into the future, dirty diabolical pig and porker of no more little ones. I hate you more than you could ever imagine. I intend to annhiliate you, along with evil Sai... via the psychic plane, of course... for now. As always, we always start by taking out your nuts. It's called the First Chakra. Then we take back the earth, the money, the everything you always murdered us for, you know, the material stuff. That's called the Second Chakra, dumb queer! Remember me better, asshole and creep? I'm the one who told you off the loudest every time you came to foul up our earth...

Do us all a favor. I told you I get even with you for the murder of so many countless Jews. You live wierdly on but for a short time. Good luck, pig and black asshole, damned Jew killer...Remember Sanjay Dhalani? He owned and operated a newpaper run by us Jews during your favorite war. We all typed and wrote nice things about your black evil Nazi ass back then too, just as we do once again in these most recent of times. Hee-hee...I like to niggle you, funky nigger...Pardon the pun, dark one. Thanks for all the helpful infor you are delivering to us, Nazi drone! I knew we'd get you to confess you still are a German queer, who is still the same demon German Nazi queer. And by the way, queer Nazi, how come both Tony and I remember you as such? Bet Tony remembers your butchering ass from a place called Dacqua or something. South of Germany, you say. Probably your father killed you during the war. If not, he'll get you in this lifetime, you murdering fool."

Funny enough, Sanjay has not spoken one word against Barbara Dent and allows her to post her psycho-drivel all over his Anti-Sai Yahoo Group (that he maintains soviet-style control over and about which he often whines that others are "criminals" for "lurking" and simply reading the messages posted there). Boo hoo!

As I said many times before. These are the Anti-Sai nuts who are boasting about "exposing" Satya Sai Baba.

Yahoo's Covert Operations

2007-01-30T13:44:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

As a follow-up to my former blogged article entitled Damage Control Kicks Into High Gear, Sanjay attempted to clarify why the Sathya Sai Baba Discussion Club (SSBDC) was not allowing members to view past archived posts. Sanjay said:

"the message archives were set to 'moderator view only' because, as I explained to Kristijan, testing was going on with some newly-introduced features of YahooGroups. The testing was completed several days ago and the message archives were restored only YESTERDAY. That it supposedly took place 'one hour after Moreno's post' is nothing but pure coincidence."

Needless to say, the alleged "newly introduced features of Yahoo Groups" did not affect any other Yahoo group. I belong to 8 groups and none of them deactivated the archived posts because of alleged "newly introduced features on Yahoo Groups". Furthermore, the SSBDC was not updated with any "newly introducted features", whatsoever! Why the archived posts were deactivated was never mentioned or discussed on the SSBDC Yahoo Group although "Bronwyn" specifically enquired about it:

Nov 30, 2006 (Post #7024): Bronwyn:
Is there a problem on this board? Archived messages are not viewable and there is no way to reply to individual posts ....

"Bronwyn" never received a response to her question although Sanjay was active on the board at that time.

Sanjay also said that although the alleged "testing" had been completed "several days ago", the post archives were restored only on December 4th 2006. This comment proves that Sanjay deactived the viewing of the archived posts and left it deactivated even after the alleged "testing" phase was over. By an amazing coincidence, Sanjay decided to re-activate the archived posts one hour after I posted my article exposing his shabby attempts at damage control.

This reminds me of Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lie, in which he claimed that his Yahoo Photo Album was not visible because:

"Yahoo decide to modify their policies and make Photo folders available to the public only if the Yahoo user has paid for premium access."

Of course, this was a blantant lie and I promptly exposed it by creating my own publicly accessible Yahoo Photo Album. Sanjay immediately flip-flopped about Yahoo modifying their policies and claimed that his Yahoo Photo Album was publicly accessible without having to pay "premium access" to view it. Then, after leaving his Yahoo Photo Album up for a couple of days, Sanjay deactivated it again.

Isn't it strange that Yahoo is allegedly engaging in all these covert "modifications" and "testings" that only seem to affect Sanjay? The truth of the matter is that Yahoo is not engaging in any covert "modifications" or "testings". Sanjay is lying through his teeth and seems to think that if he tells a seemingly credible lie, he can get away with it. Fortunately, people are not as dumb as Sanjay thinks they are.

Gaudiya Kutir Wiki - Newest Editor

2007-01-05T08:03:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Believe it or not, Sanjay is the newest editor at Gaudiya Kutir Wiki and uses the name "Sanjay". Sanjay gushed over the prospect that he would contribute to the Caitanya Mahaprabhu article.

Gaudiya Kutir Wiki (gkWiki) is an online Gaudiya Vaishnava encyclopedia. It is a wikipedia-like community resource that seeks to build information about all things related to Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu's Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition.

I wonder if Sanjay will include the story where Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu rejected Junior Haridas for simply looking at a woman with lust and was pleased that Junior Haridas atoned for his sin by committing suicide! How much worse it must be for Sanjay when he claims to be a devotee of Mahaprabhu yet went around secretly stalking innocent teenagers, mothers and university students with his digicam, filming them under tables and up their dresses, calling them "sluts" and "bitches" and posting over 300 pictures of his lustful escapades on his StreetBitches Blog? After exploiting female teenagers and women so ruthlessly, Sanjay has the audacity to continue to pretend he is a devotee of Caitanya Mahaprabhu! Unconscionable!

Sanjay is also a confirmed Jesus-sex fetishist, woman-hater, pathological liar, self-professed drunk, psychologically unstable hip-hop boy and a cow hating leather fetishist.

This is the guy who points his holier-than-thou pudgy fingers at others and tries to portray himself as a "devotee" who is pious and devoted to Mahaprabhu! Oh well, happy editing on Gaudiya Kutir, Sanjay.

British Controversy & Sathya Sai Baba

2006-12-25T22:15:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

This is an update to my previous article entitled Paul Lewis, The Guardian & The Anti-Sai Hack Job.

For those familiar with the original UK Guardian newspaper article (entitled: "The Indian living god, the paedophilia claims and the Duke of Edinburgh awards"), there has been a subsequent media article published anonymously through IANS (Indo-Asian News Service) on December 22nd 2006 that essentially repeated the same information originally published in The Guardian article.

Sanjay has been publicly boasting (as is his wont) about how many media sites are now publishing this more recent article. The newer article has been published under various names like:

UK charity runs into rough seas over Sai Baba link

Satya Sai Baba caught in British controversy

Spiritual leader Satya Sai Baba caught in British controversy

Brit boys to keep off Sai Baba's reach

Sai Baba accused of sexual abuse

I was thinking how the original Guardian article about Sathya Sai Baba was duplicated in about 4-5 other media sources. A month and a half later, the newer circulating version has been duplicated in over a dozen (and counting) media sources. I have received several emails expressing frustration about this flurry of media duplicating this newer article.

But it appears that this may actually be good news! Call it my "good fortune", but since my article about The British Controversy, Paul Lewis And The Anti-Sai Hackjob was published one and a half months ago, it has since become well situated in Google's search results. This means, of course, that those who are truly interested in this matter will research it and find my high-ranking webpage about it!

To verify this, I just looked at my site stats and they are up 65%, all directly related to Paul Lewis and Vir Sanghvi. This is actually a wave of good luck! The timing could not have been more perfect.

This rain cloud has a golden lining

In Defence Of Sathya Sai Baba

2006-12-11T19:08:00.000-08:00

For those who want to know the truth about the allegations against Satya Sai Baba, a simple defence is all that is needed:

Sathya Sai Baba has never been proven to be a "charlatan".

Sathya Sai Baba has never been convicted of any crime.

Sathya Sai Baba has never been charged with any crime.

Sathya Sai Baba has never had even one single complaint lodged against him by any alleged victim, first-hand, in India. As a matter of fact, not even one alleged victim has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India (the only place where courts would have jurisdiction over Baba as an individual defendent).

I cannot overemphasize that last sentence:

To date, Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba has never had even one single complaint lodged against him by any alleged victim (first-hand) in India.

These are the cold, hard facts and no rationalist, critic, skeptic or ex-devotee can provide a scintilla of verifiable evidence to the contrary.

To view a Pro-Sai website that discusses all of the allegations, please visit:

http://www.saisathyasai.com/

Exposing the lies, deceit and dishonesty of critics, skeptics and ex-devotees of Sathya Sai Baba

Damage Control Kicks Into High Gear

2006-12-03T19:20:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Recently, Sanjay took over Said Afshin Khorramshahgol's Yahoo Group. For some time, Sanjay was apparently suggesting to Afshin how the group should be run (as the settings kept changing, willy-nilly, from public to private). This was done because Sanjay made some very amusing and very embarrassing posts on this Group when he was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba. For example, see the following articles:

- Swaaaami!!! La la la la laaaaa!!
- Sanjay's "Direct Experience" Of Sathya Sai Baba's Godhood

Sanjay was given full control over Afshin's Yahoo Group and the very first thing that Sanjay did was purge and ban over two hundred fifty three (253) members. See the following screencap with the number of members before and after Sanjay took control of the Group:

Sanjay also changed the settings where no one (except moderators) can view any of the posts (past or present). These actions, by Sanjay, pushed the Group's ranking from position 6 to position 29 on Yahoo's Group Rankings For Sathya Sai Baba (which is ranked according to number of members belonging to the group). Way to go Sanjay! These actions also (thankfully) prevent the general public from viewing the filth, slime and defamations that Anti-Sai Activists have been propagandizing for years. Once again, way to go Sanjay!

Needless to say, Sanjay's compulsive need to be in control is just more proof of the type of secretive, slimy and sleazy tactics that he utilizes to do damage control and prevent others from reading his looney, weird and equivocal rantings.

However, I have some bad news for Sanjay: I saved all the posts I wanted to save when I had the chance to. Foresight has been the greatest weapon against Anti-Sai Activists. I knew, sooner or later, that Sanjay would either directly moderate or take over Afshin's Yahoo Group. I was right. Anti-Sai Activist's pattern of deception and deceit has made them very vulnerable and very predictable. I even know what Sanjay's next move is going to be.

For background information, at one point I was a member of Afshin's Yahoo Group and made a single post (Ref) that was promptly deleted. See For Yourself. Of course, the typical excuse given for deleting my post was that links promoting one's website were not allowed. Nevertheless, when links to Sanjay's blog or Anti-Sai Sites were posted, those links were allowed. Although I never made any other posts on this group, I was eventually banned from the group without being given any reason whatsoever. Of course, all of this goes to show how Anti-Sai Activist's are running scared, are trying to cover their tracks and operate on the premise of suppression and soviet-style control.

Sanjay is an egotistical control freak who continually seeks to quash and quieten the voices of opposition to the Anti-Sai Movement. Sanjay succeeded in quashing the voice of devotees and proponents on Jody Radzik's Guruphiliac Blog and on Afshin's Yahoo Group. Sanjay attempted and failed to quash my voice on GaudiyaDiscussions.com and succeeded in getting me banned (for no reason) on the GaudiyaRepercussion.com site (which Tapati McDaniels is now having to suffer her "Sanjay-Repercussions" for doing). Sanjay also ceaselessly attempts to dictate to others what they should and should not post on the SSB2 Yahoo Group and on the QuickTopic forum.

Sanjay has much to fear and with good reason. The more Sanjay tries to quieten the voices of opposition, the more we succeed in getting our voices heard.

UPDATE:
Before I published this blog entry, I emailed Lisa with 2 predictions about what Sanjay would do once this blog entry was published. Needless to say, within an hour of publishing this article, Sanjay is now permitting members to view past and present posts on the sathyasaibabadiscussionclub Yahoo Group. This was one of the predictions I made. The second one has yet to be fulfilled. Once it is, I will have Lisa publish the email I sent her and I will also publish my predictions here as well. As I said before, Sanjay (the Anti-Sai Clown) has become very predictable!

Blog Index Of Articles This Month

2006-11-29T19:46:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Blog Index Of Articles For November 2006:

Exposure Of Vir Sanghvi:
- The Truth About Vir Sanghvi

Exposing Anti-Sai Bias:
- BBC 'Secret Swami' Programme Bias
- Michelle Goldberg Salon.com Bias
- Paul Lewis, The Guardian & The Anti-Sai Hack Job
- To Flip-Flop Or Not To Flip Flop?

Sanjay's Gay Bashing Backfires In His Face:
- Sanjay Worships Pink, Girly & Gay Gods
- Bhaktivedanta Manor, Sanjay Dadlani And 3G
- Pink Is In. Sanjay Isn't.
- Sanjay's Pink G-String

Miscellaneous:
- Sanjay Dadlani The Energizer Braggart
- Sanjay Rekindling His Love For Sathya Sai Baba
- Sanjay's Disgusting Feces Obsession
- Sanjay's "Stalking" Paranoia
- Sanjay's "Direct Experience" Of Sathya Sai Baba's Godhood
- Sanjay's Christian Supporter
- Bow Or Bow-Wow?

Previous Blogged Articles:
- Blog Index Of Articles For October 2006:
- Blog Index Of Articles (Dec 05 - Sept 06)

The Truth About Vir Sanghvi

2006-11-29T09:37:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay recently referred to Vir Sanghvi's Anti-Sai article entitled, "The Truth About Sathya Sai Baba", which he found on a Hare Krishna site. Apparently Sanjay is lagging behind because I already fully responded to the article before he mentioned it. The following is my response:

Vir Sanghvi Menu (click on a link to go to relevant section):
Introduction To The Indian Journalist Vir Sanghvi
Vir Sanghvi's "Counterpoint" Columnist Article
Did Sathya Sai Baba Just Celebrate His 80th Birthday?
Did Sathya Sai Baba Engage In Questionable Behavior With "little boys"?
Are The Homosexual Allegations "too numerous to dispute"?
Is There A List Of Western Complainants That Run "into triple figures"?
Can All Of Sathya Sai Baba's Miracles Easily Be Performed By Conjurors?
In Conclusion

Introduction To The Indian Journalist Vir Sanghvi:
Return To Menu

Vir Sanghvi is an Indian journalist who is a staunch critic of Sathya Sai Baba. He is currently the editorial director for the Hindustan Times (which may explain why they almost exclusively report negative information about Sathya Sai Baba), former editor for Sunday, former consulting editor for Anada Bazaar Patrika, former editor for Imprint, founder-editor for Bombay Magazine and currently writes a Counterpoint weekly column in the Hindusan Times. Vir Sanghvi was allegedly educated at Mayo College, Ajmer and Oxford University, is reputed as being one of the youngest editors in India and is also a television personality.

Don't let all of these credentials fool you. Vir Sanghvi is willing to compromise his integrity and reputation as a journalist by resorting to disrespectable research, bias and sensationalistic propaganda to promote his views against Sathya Sai Baba.

Vir Sanghvi's "Counterpoint" Columnist Article:
Return To Menu

On November 25th 2006, Vir Sanghvi wrote a Counterpoint columnist article in the Hindustan Times entitled "The Truth About Sathya Sai Baba". Not only did Vir Sanghvi not know that Sathya Sai Baba turned 81 (he claimed Baba turned 80), he admitted that he is "not big on Sathya Sai Baba" and referred to him as the "old boy".

In his Counterpoint article, Vir Sanghvi made the following inaccurate claims about Sathya Sai Baba:

Sathya Sai Baba just celebrated his 80'th birthday.

There is a "sordid controversy" about Sathya Sai Baba engaging in questionable behavior with "little boys".

The homosexual allegations against Sathya Sai Baba are "too numerous to dispute".

That the list of Western complainants runs "into triple figures".

All of Sathya Sai Baba's miracles can easily be performed by conjurors.

Did Sathya Sai Baba Just Celebrate His 80th Birthday?
Return To Menu

The answer is "no". Sathya Sai Baba just celebrated his 81st birthday. Nice double-checking there, Mr. Vir Sanghvi.

Did Sathya Sai Baba Engage In Questionable Behavior With "little boys"?
Return To Menu

Those opposing Sathya Sai Baba wage an unremitting smear campaign against him that accuses him of "serial pedophilia" and the sexual abuse of "boys" and "children". These allegations are fallacious, unsustantiated and wholly untrue. There are no testimonies from "boys", "children" or parents of children that support the erroneous claim that Sathya Sai Baba is a pedophile who engaged in sexual interactions with children. To date, there are no court cases, police complaints, affidavits, public grievances or lawsuits from any parent alleging that Sathya Sai Baba sexually abused his/her child. Not even one single legitimate complaint. Sathya Sai Baba has never been charged with any crime, has never been convicted of any crime and has never had even one single complaint lodged against him, first-hand, by any alleged victim (child, teenager, parent or adult) in India.

Vir Sanghvi cannot cite even one single police complaint or court case that supports his erroneous claim that Sathya Sai Baba engaged in questionable behavior with "little kids". One would think that a journalist of Vir Sanghvi's calibre would have the basic integrity to research and confirm allegations before publishing unsupported opinions, speculations and conspriacy theories in the Hindustan Times. To date, neither Vir Sanghvi or anyone else have been able to confirm even one single case where Sathya Sai Baba engaged in questionable behavior with "little kids".

Are The Homosexual Allegations "too numerous to dispute"?
Return To Menu

To support his claim that the homosexual abuse allegations against Sathya Sai Baba are "too numerous to dispute", Vir Sanghvi suggested that one enter "Sathya Sai Baba" and "homosexuality" into a Google search. Because there are almost 18,000 returns, Vir Sanghvi concluded that these allegations are "too numerous to dispute" and some of these allegations must be true. What kind of journalist bases facts and figures on Google results? This is not only shabby research, it is poor journalism.

For example, enter "George Bush" and "homosexuality" into a Google search and you will get an astounding 1,250,000 (plus) returns: View Results. Enter "Jesus" and "homosexuality" into a Google search and you will get an astounding 1,300,000 (plus) returns: View Results. Enter "Mother Teresa" and "homosexuality" into a Google search and you will get 330,000 (plus) returns: View Results. Using Vir Sanghvi's lamentable logic, one must conclude that some of these results are indicative that George Bush, Jesus and Mother Teresa engaged in acts of homosexuality. What kind of journalist uses this type of propaganda as "evidence" against others? In my opinion, the only type of journalists who engage in this type of low-class propaganda are tabloid journalists who care less for facts and care more for sensationalism and fiction.

Furthermore, enter "Vir Sanghvi" and "homosexuality" into a Google search: View The 500+ Results. Enter "Vir Sanghvi" and "stupid" into a Google search: View The 1,300+ Results. Enter "Vir Sanghvi" and "offensive" into a Google search: View The 1,200+ Results. Enter "Vir Sanghvi" and "corrupt" into a Google search: View The 1,000+ Results. Enter "Vir Sanghvi" and "bias" into a Google search: View The 1,100+ Results.

Since Vir Sanghvi is not an internationally revered guru like Sathya Sai Baba (who has millions of followers), these results are high for one person. Are we to conclude that Mr. Sanghvi engaged in acts of "homosexuality" and that he is "stupid", "corrupt", "biased" and "offensive" based on Google's results? Using Sanghvi's standard, the answer is "yes". After all this is the standard and "evidence" that he attempted to use against Sathya Sai Baba. Why can't others use the same standard against Mr. Sanghvi?

For those who are not gullible, naive or sensationalists, Google's results are not indicative of guilt, evidence, complaints, behavior or anything else for that matter. Google's results simply return webpages (many duplicates) with all possible combinations of keywords located on any given webpage. This explains the Google results obtained for George Bush, Jesus and Mother Teresa. This also explains why Vir Sanghvi had 500+ Google results when his name was combined with the word "homosexuality".

Is There A List Of Western Complainants That Run "into triple figures"?
Return To Menu

I am not aware of any list composed of Westerner complainants that "runs into triple figures". Where did Vir Sanghvi obtain this information from?

On the sites run by ex-devotees of Sathya Sai Baba, they provide a list of alleged sexual abuse victims. The list is composed of sixteen names (many are fake names). That's it. See For Yourself. All of these alleged victims (except one 16 year old) are adults 18 to 31 years of age. No "little boys" are listed. Perhaps Mr. Sanghvi could inform us as to which reliable source he viewed to support his claim that there is a "list of complainants" that runs "into triple figures" (for Westerners only)?

It is my strong suspicion that Vir Sanghvi is either referring to the bogus online-petition against Sathya Sai Baba on SaiPetition.net (in which anyone can submit multiple fake entries under multiple fake names) or he is referring to Robert Priddy's bogus list of "Prominent Ex-Devotees Of Sai Baba" (a majority who were never "fondled" by Sathya Sai Baba and whose names were mostly lifted from the bogus online-petition website). Why is it that a notable journalist like Vir Sanghvi cannot back up his claims with verifiable and reliable sources? Are these the low standards that Vir Sanghvi must utilize in order to promote his Anti-Sai bias and poorly-constructed arguments in the Hindustan Times? Sadly, this appears to be the case.

Can All Of Sathya Sai Baba's Miracles Easily Be Performed By Conjurors?
Return To Menu

Mr. Sanghvi claimed that "every single one" of Sathya Sai Baba's miracles can be easily performed by even "moderately-talented conjurors". Although it is true that any alleged materialization that Sathya Sai Baba performs will be inextricably tied to doubt, I have yet to see any "conjuror" who can heal people from incurable diseases, appear to people all around the world (in dreams, visions and physical form) and manifest vibuthi, amrita, kumkum, tumeric, holy water, mishri, coins, statues of gods and goddesses, siva lingams, crystals, gems, fragrances, flowers, lights, and various other substances on the altars of devotees all around the world and in the privacy of their own homes (like Sathya Sai Baba is reputed as doing).

There are literally thousands of such stories and first-hand accounts. Even some ex-devotees (to this day) still attest to Sathya Sai Baba's paranormal abilities.

The following links show a small sampling of manifestations and materializations typically associated with Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. These manifestations occur in the privacy of devotee's homes all around the world, thousands of miles away from Sathya Sai Baba's physical form. Any "conjuror" up to duplicating these alleged miracles?:

Manifestations At Sai Sruti Temple in Harrow, Middlesex, UK

Vibhuti Manifestation in a Devotee's House in London

Vibuthi Manfestations In Bali, Indonesia

Manifestations In Colusa, California

Manifestations At Sri Ragnapatnam, Mysore, India

In Conclusion:
Return To Menu

I think Mr. Vir Sanghvi owes Sathya Sai Baba an apology and should immediately retract his erroneous, inaccurate and dishonest comments until a time comes when he can factually document his current speculations and assumptions with verifiable, accurate and truthful data from reliable and reputable sources. The style of Vir Sanghvi's article is emotional, as opposed to objective. This behavior is not what one would expect from the editorial director of the Hindustan Times. Or is it?

The internet version of Vir Sanghvi's article allows for people to submit responses. Although several responses (pro and con) were published, mine was not, hence this webpage. Just more proof of the suppression and dictator-like control weilded by Vir Sanghvi on the Hindustan Times and his abject failure to accept responsiblity for his blind guesswork, second-rate research, overemotionalism and ludicrous claims against Sathya Sai Baba.

Return To Top Menu

Duplicated From Sai-Fi.net

Sanjay Worships Pink, Girly & Gay Gods

2006-11-28T11:37:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay has a big problem with the color pink. Sanjay repeatedly associated the color pink with homosexuality and made frequent homosexual-slurs against me because I chose the pink template used on this blog. As a matter of fact, Sanjay said:

WHEREAS Gèrald Morèno has recently re-formatted his stalkblog in a neon pink theme,...I have hereby concluded that Gèrald 'Joe' Morèno is a homosexual.

Not only does Sanjay have a problem with the color pink, he also recently started attacking Sathya Sai Baba as being a "girly" and "gay" God. Funny enough, Sanjay completely ignored (and continues to ignore) the fact that the Bhaktivedanta Manor deities (that he worships as God Incarnate) are not only extremely "girly" and "gay", they are often dressed in effeminate pastel colors, including pink! I blogged about this on my former article entitled Bhaktivedanta Manor, Sanjay Dadlani And 3G.

Now, let us take a look at the Bhaktivedanta Manor Deities of RadhaKrishna and Lord Ramachandra all dressed in pink:

Lord Krishna And Radharani Wearing "Girly" and "Gay" Pink and Hot Pink Attire:
01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14

Lord Ramachandra, Lakshmana, Sita And Hanuman All Wearing "Girly" and "Gay" Pink And Hot Pink Attire (Notice the hair on Rama and Lakshmana: Would look like Sathya Sai Baba's hair if the headpieces were removed):
01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13

Funny enough, ALL of Sanjay's homosexual slurs about the color pink and "girly" and "gay" Gods are now directed to the very deities that Sanjay bows to, prays to and worships as God Incarnate! One must remember that Sanjay himself admitted that he is a Bhaktivedanta Manor congregational member and that he literally gets down on his hand and knees and bows to these deities (see: Bow Or Bow-Wow?).

Is it just me or does it sound rather queer that Sanjay (the self-professed "complete studmuffin" among men) ceaselessly mocks others as being "homosexuals", "girly" and "gay" yet expressed the desire to wear a Pink G-String and himself worships effeminate-looking male deities (replete with earrings, rings, necklaces, wigs, lipstick, nail-polish, eyeliner, sparkle make-up around the eyes, jingling bell-anklets, bracelets, bangels, toe-rings, butterfly and flower barrettes, pearls, flowery garlands, shawls, colorful decorations and elaborate head-pieces)?

Couple all these facts with Sanjay's orgasmic gushing about Lord Krishna's Biceps, his passion for Elvis Presley, his acknowlegement of having homosexual friends, his sexual attraction for Jesus Christ, his fantasies of males sexually desiring him, his incestuous homoeroticism, his gender confusion and homoerotic confession for Kiedis, his views that He-Man is "very powerful", "handsome" and was his "ultimate role model" and everything seems to take on a very homo-erotic and very hypocritical tone. Don't you agree?

Sanjay is full of contradictions and he miserably fails to live up to the same standards he continually uses to measure Sathya Sai Baba with.

Sanjay Rekindling His Love For Sathya Sai Baba

2006-11-25T09:53:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On the QuickTopic forum and on his blog, Sanjay recently admitted that he attended Sathya Sai Baba's birthday celebrations in London! Sanjay said:

By the way, I went along to the birthday celebrations here in London just to check it out. Just the usual platitudes and shit, nothing new.

Don't ask me why, but I just thought it would be fun to attend the 81st Birthday (2006) celebrations here in London...Just to stick the knife in, I also got photos taken of myself with top-level Sai Organisation. ;-)

As I have said many times before, Sanjay not only stalks Sathya Sai Baba, he also has an unhealthy obsession with him as well. WHY would Sanjay feel even remotely inclined to attend Sathya Sai Baba's birthday celebrations in London when he ceaselessly labels him as a "homosexual pedophile" and a "faggot"? Mind you, at these birthday celebrations Baba's pictures are everywhere, movies are shown about him, songs are sung in his praise and all the talk revolves around him! WHY would Sanjay throw himself in the middle of all that?

It seems to me that Sanjay has hidden and secret desires to see Sathya Sai Baba and hear songs sung in his praise. Sanjay's life revolves around Sri Sathya Sai Baba. Sanjay tracks every news article pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba, devoted a blog to Sathya Sai Baba, searches the internet for information and pictures about Sathya Sai Baba, is regularly informed about the events surrounding Sathya Sai Baba and now he attended Sathya Sai Baba's birthday celebrations in London! Sanjay also blogged the following:

Whoop-de-doo, I am regularly informed about happenings in Puttaparthi and I knew about these events weeks in advance.

Sounds devotee-ish? Doesn't it?

As a matter of fact, Sanjay seemed to admit that he is a "wicked person" who is devoted to Sathya Sai Baba through hate. Sanjay posted the following quote at the end of his posts on the SSB2 Yahoo Group:

"For [the] Lord, both abuse and praise have no meaning. However, in the world many persons secure liberation Moksha by abusing the Lord, many other achieve salvation by adoring God ... But wicked persons achieve liberation more easily than those who love the Divine. The wicked person achieves merger in the Divine very quickly." - Sathya Sai Baba, 9th September 1992

Sounds to me like someone is rekindling a past love affair.

Bhaktivedanta Manor, Sanjay Dadlani And 3G

2006-11-24T22:35:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Gaurasundara") has developed a new-found sensitivity for "girly and gay gods" and thinks that since Sathya Sai Baba wears "dresses every day" (they are actually gowns/robes) he is a "cross-dresser transvestite drag queen" who is "androgyne". On the QuickTopic forum, Sanjay said:

Now Sai Baba is known as 3G. :-) No, this is not the cool abbreviation for third-generation mobile phones, it stands for the 3 Gs: Girly Gay God....Last but not least, Sai Baba is an androgyne. Since he started his mission in 1943 (not 1940, lol), he has been a cross-dresser transvestite drag queen who still wears dresses every day! Yes, go and worship your light of the world. 3G = Girly Gay God. Lol. I feel nothing but pity for your faggot-worship.

What is amusing about Sanjay's comments is that he is a self-professed Hare Krishna Congregational Member who prostrates, sings, prays, worships and offers repeated obeisances to the deities of Lord Krishna and Srimati Radharani at the Bhaktivedanta Manor Temple in the UK. This is the same temple where Sanjay claimed he was (sexually?) abused and whose president (Gauridas) personally told me, "Shocking...Whatever connections he (Sanjay Kishore Dadlani) has professed to have with ISKCON are fictitous. Therefore do not link him to Bhaktivedanta Manor!"

At the Bhaktivedanta Manor, both of the deities of Radha-Krishna wear elaborate, embroidered and effeminate-looking dresses (mostly in pastels), earrings, rings, necklaces, wigs, lipstick, nail-polish, eyeliner, sparkle make-up around the eyes, jingling bell-anklets, bracelets, bangels, toe-rings, butterfly and flower barrettes, pearls, flowery garlands, shawls, colorful decorations and elaborate head-pieces!

The following links are pictures of deities at the Hare Krishna Bhaktivedanata Manor (the temple Sanjay attends in the UK). These are the alleged non-"gayish" and non-"girly" deities that Sanjay prostates to, prays to and fervently worships as God Incarnate:

Lord Krishna (male): Examples:
Examples: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05

Radha-Krishna (male on left, female on right):
Examples: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05

Lord Krishna's Feet With Anklets, Toe Rings, Nail Polish, etc. (male):
Examples: 01 - 02 - 03

Click Here To View All BhaktiVedanata Manor Pictures

After looking at all these pictures, it is nothing less than utter absurdity and sheer hypocrisy for Sanjay to point his pudgy, self-righteous fingers at Sathya Sai Baba and accuse him of being a "Girly Gay God". Especially when the deities Sanjay worships and prostates to are extremely "girly" and profoundly "gayish". These deities look like they just emerged from the New Orleans Mardi Gras. Although I have never given it much thought before one could certainly reason (especially like the Indian Rationalists that Sanjay superficially sides with, although he is a Gaudiya Vaishnava) that these marble deities are dressed like "cross-dresser transvestite drag queens" who are "androgyne". I have met many people who thought Lord Krishna was a woman and who could not tell the difference between Lord Krishna and Radharani. This is because Lord Krishna is usually depicted as a very effeminate male. Here is a popular picture of Lord Krishna that proves my point:

Why does Sanjay worship such effeminate looking deities in the first place if he is so offended by and sensitive to "girly" and "gay"-looking gods?

Putting aside Sanjay's indirect mocking of the "girly" and "gay" gods at the Bhaktivedanta Manor, he also implied that these deities are lifeless marble stones that are devoid of any living presence! Hare Krishna! Sanjay said:

Oh by the way, remember that when Moreno blasphemes Hindu religion, he is talking about marble deities. When I am laughing my ass off at Sai Baba, I am talking about a living breathing human being who wears dresses every day since 1945.

Sanjay just "blasphemed" his own Hindu religion when he contrasted a "living breathing human being" with "marble deities" that are apparently lifeless and do not embody any living presence! Why should I say anything against the worship of stone dolls when Sanjay just made the case for me? Apparently, Sathya Sai Baba is not allowed to wear a gown/robe but stone deities that are worshipped as God Incarnate can wear effeminate dresses, make-up, jewelry, etc., and it is actually encouraged and eulogized!

Although Sanjay was quick to accuse me of "blaspheming" his Hindu religion (as he often does), he is feigning self-righteous religious fervor. Sanjay publicly defends and promotes the Anti-Sai Activists Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard, both who explicitly "blasphemed" Gaudiya Vaishanvas, Hare Krishnas, Hindus and their scriptures when they said that people who believe in the Ramayana are "backward intellectually" "ignorant peasants" who believes in "impossible concocted stories of the 'Superman' kind" (Reference). Needless to say, Sanjay casually dismissed these comments and was not offended by them whatsoever! Sanjay is a religious hypocrite who is willing to compromise his own religious beliefs when it comes to Sathya Sai Baba. Let one Sai devotee or proponent say one word remotely critizing Sanjay's religious beliefs and he gnashes his teeth, foams at the mouth and cries "blasphemy". However, when Anti-Sai Activists directly, unequivocally and explicitly attack Sanjay's religious beliefs, he is wholly unconcerned and ignores it.

Sanjay has a very strange sexual obsession with Sathya Sai Baba. What is disturbing about this is that Sanjay has a proven sexual obsession with Jesus Christ and a proven sexual obsession with boots and strappy shoes. Factor in Sanjay's orgasmic salivations over Lord Krishna's Biceps, his Disgusting Feces Obsession and the numerous exposures against him (Refs: 01 - 02) and everything reeks of deviancy, hypocrisy and perversity.

If it moves like a snake, looks like a snake, slithers like snake and hisses like a snake, it's a snake. Sanjay (the snake of the Anti-Sai Movement) keeps slithering, hissing and spitting venom at everything that moves, including his own religion. All I have to do is say a few words and watch Sanjay self-destruct in a fit of anger and bitterness. Sanjay has solidly situated himself between a rock and a hard marble deity. I say "3G" across the board. So what do you say, Sanjay?

(P.S.: For Bhaktivedanta Members who may still be unsure as to Sanjay's identity, he is the author of the Gaurasundara Blog, which has his picture displayed on it.)

Sanjay's Disgusting Feces Obsession

2006-11-23T23:49:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

For those who are familiar with Sanjay and his weird obsessions, fascinations and perversions, it will come as no surprise that Sanjay has a deeply rooted and disgusting fascination for feces.

To begin with, Sanjay went on a hissing and shrieking rampage accusing me of having a "fascination for faecal material" and being a "toilet sex pervert" because I used the word "poo" 14 times in my article about Jody Radzik (the Guruphiliac webmaster). Although Jody Radzik specifically used the words "poop" and "shit" to make his arguments against Gurus, Sanjay thought nothing of Jody's reference to fecal material. However, when I used the word "poo" 14 times (out of a 5,484 word article or a .0025% word density percentage), Sanjay irrationally and neurotically concluded that I was a "toilet sex pervet" that had a "fascination for fecal material"! This speaks volumes for Sanjay's filthy and pig-like tendency to soil others with his own sewer-like mentality.

Here are some of Sanjay's accusations against me because I used the word "poo" in my article about the Guruphiliac Webmaster and because Rasa von Werder (an alleged former porn star with whom I have never spoken or associated myself with) linked her own critical webpage about Jody Radzik to my critical webpage about him. Sanjay said (typos left in tact):

...perverted sexual fetish for faeces...

SEXUALLY SIGUSTING PERVERSIONS for his urine and faeces fetish.

It makes me laugh to see how he continues to point out fault sin other peopel (and stalk other people now) when his own disgusting sexual proclivities with references to faeces and urine have been exposed, proclaiming as arguably the most disgusting pervert ever!

...disgusting toilet sex fascinations evidenced by his own writings about anuses and faeces...

Moreno is a toilet sex porn pervert who dreams about people's faeces and anuses...

DOCUMENTED facination for faeces and anuses...

Is Gerald a coprophiliac? I actua Yes?

Nope, sorry pal. I don't do faeces, you do.

He also fantasizes about anuses and faeces by virtue of his connection with Rasa von Werder, an ex-porn star who makes disgusting pronographic movies feauturing scenes of urination and simulation of eating excrement.

(Reference For All The Quotes Above)

One is left to wonder how exactly Sanjay found out that Rasa made pornographic movies that involved "scenes of urination and simulations of eating excrement" if he did not watch the porn-movies himself? Sanjay apparently obtained Rasa's porn movies and watched every "disgusting" second of it, documenting "scenes of urination and the simulation of eating excrement".

Perhaps Sanjay will try to rationalize viewing Rasa's porn as his job for the IWF? Perhaps Sanjay will resort to the excuse that he was "curious" whether or not her porn movie really had porn or whether it was an innocent movie flick (as he similarly tried to do in justifying his requests for Jesus, Biblical and Disney Pornography on adult Google groups)? Or perhaps Sanjay will simply say he related stories he read on the internet but never verified for himself?

Sanjay is very much into pornography and this was proven with the public exposure of his StreetBitches Blog, in which he linked to illegal teen porn sites and pornographic boot-fetish sites. Sanjay also likes to post pictures of skimpily clad women in public forums (Reference) and admitted that, "The best sex anybody can ever have is kinky" (Reference).

Sanjay's alleged "disgust" for pornography is one huge and hypocritical pretense.

Funny enough, I am not the first person to make the observation that Sanjay has an unhealthy obsession with feces. "Truth_Bliss" made these observations far before I came on the scene. "Truth_Bliss" said:

September 5th 2003:
You really have a fascination with feces dont you? Just cant get it, or where it comes from, out of your mind. How do you like wallowing in the gutter? A lot obviously...And dont waste our time with your fairy tales kiddo. We are grown ups here.
(Reference)

March 3rd 2004:
Why? What did you do you sick pervert? Download some more child porn?

Its pitiful to see such a PROVEN lowlife, ignoramus and retard such as
you congratulating yourself:

1. You are a busted child porn addict

2. You are a busted LIAR whose claim that he was working as a 'child porn investigator' for IWF was PROVEN false.

3. You are an imbecilic ignoramus who thinks that stars shine with the Sun's light!

4. You are a clueless yet pretentious poser who still doesnt know that the Upanishads are a part of the Vedas and are considered Sruthi.

5. You are a self-loathing delusional wacko who claims he is 'white' when you are obviously colored.

6. You are a demented, depressed-looking dork who used to pass off a picture of a bollywood actor as his own.

7. You are a hatefilled jerk who insults India's greatest saints and sages with the foulest language just because they teach Upanishadic truth: Advaita.

8. You are am utterly sleazy gutter-mouth who has a noxious fascination for feces and anuses.

9. You are a servile, spineless worm who preens with pride when patted on the back by mediocrities such as Priddy, Steel, Pittard etc who are merely using you as a colored face for their white mischief

10. You are a loser who needs to get a life

WHAT's there for you to be proud of you pitiful perv????
(Reference)

March 10th 2004:
Fortunately it DOES show your disgusting fascination with feces, farts, anuses. You are a sleazebag with sewage in your skull. Its hilarious to watch you fake 'good' behaviour for a short while and then suddenly relapse into your true filthy nature. (Reference)

Even going back to December 2001, Sanjay was telling bold-faced lies and making references to feces. Sanjay said:

He's loved, by brainwashed people who would eat his faeces given half the chance. (Reference)

And to top it all off, Sanjay has a penchant to use the words "shit" and "bullshit". Here a few of many quotes taken from his former and current blogs and the QuickTopic forum:

Now it's October and I haven't even heard shit...They all fucking try this shit with me...I am NOT gonna be letting this shit go, especially from fucking nervous cowards who ain't even got the guts to come and face me...And she just turned all of that to shit...Little bitches, brought up as sluts. fucking shitty females, my ass. They can go die...A lot of shit went down in Sri Lanka...it was a load of bullshit...her own problems and fucking insecurities, stupid insecurities which never meant shit to me...Fuck that lame shit...it made me feel like shit...I think I might have needed to get seriously drunk before I could get down to some serious shit with her...Bhavna, really and shittily screwed me up so bad that I'm almost burnt for life...Why is it that this fucking shit happens to me EVERY time?...warm, honest, loving, trusting and all of that shit...start beliving in that love shit...the whole thing goes to shit...So now alcohol ain't gonnabe enough to deal with this shit?...I've been feeling like shit all week...shit I been going through lately...It's shitty...companionship and all that emo bullshit...compare his shit...I am gonna die like this, in this shit, I swear I am...Shit, he had a whole brick of weed...Shit!..."Oh shit," I thought to myself...Nice shit...Shit, no matter how much people hate Syed...the irritating shit who everyone wanted to be fired since Week 1...nothing but shallow shit...No shit, Mr. Chakravarthi!...No shit, Swami!...Sto pputting words in my mouth and stop talking bullshit...So don't give me any bullshit...Stop talking bullshit, Moreno, LOL!...Stop talking bullshit and stop trying to play with the big boys you silly little amateur...LIMF's "reason" is bullshit, and they have made many more bullshit explanations...Just the usual platitudes and shit...Simon eats cowshit and loves it!

Since Sanjay accused me of being a "toilet sex pervet" that had a "fascination for fecal material" simply because I used the word "poo", what does Sanjay's usage of the words "shit" and "bullshit" make him? Undoubtedly, this makes Sanjay a flaming fecal fetishist, using the very same standards he used against me!

Sanjay, don't you just hate it when your own illogic comes back to bite you? Judging from Sanjay's words, we know exactly what he is full of (and I can tell you now, it isn't "love").

Sanjay's "Stalking" Paranoia

2006-11-21T22:27:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay apparently has some sort of paranoid personality disorder in which he imagines that people are continually stalking him. Let us look at a few of Sanjay's many quotes about other's "stalking" him and being "stalkers":

Oh yeah, and stop following me around from forum to forum like a pair of crazy obsessed stalkers.

...carries out his round-the-clock perverse stalking of various individuals with obvious glee...

...psychopathic obsessive and stalking behaviour by keeping silent and saying NOTHING in disapproval...

Remember how he joined THAT forum for the sole purpose of STALKING me?

...stalking me all over the Net, adding his own slanderous comments...

...exposes the both of you, you crazy wacky stalking braindead zombies, you...

...fails to recognise is that he dreamt of stalking me, floating around in my house and then SPYING on me in my bedroom...

...he has been kicked out of Gaudiya Repercussions three times in a row for stalking behaviour...

On his latest stalkblog...

...his increasing number of fanatical obsessive stalkblogs is that they only reflect badly on HIM and his psychoactive nature...

...more proof of his rabid stalking...

Shamelees twisted creepy stalking little boy...

Gerald and Lisa, who make CAREERS out of stalking me everywhere and getting...

...he can continue stalking me in a bid to satisfy his increasing homosexual love for me...

The homosexually obsessed stalk-blogger is so full of desperation to slake his homosexual thirts...

...like Stalker Moreno...

...a maniacal obsessive STALKER who just WON'T leave people alone...

...and who only came out later to STALK me and create a fuss with pointed posts...

That's what happens to naughty little boys who have nothing better to do than stalk people all over the place...

...goes in the Guinness book for being the most obsessive and creepiest stalker ever...

Speaks volumes about the intellectually dishonest obsessive stalker who desperately tries to pin down things on me that are not mine. :-)

What an obsessive stalking creep!

...has taken to obsessively stalking other people, because evidently I have stopped satisfying his lust for voyeurism...

...has been obsessing over me since September 2005 or thereabouts, stalking me all over the Internet...

Since BOTH Gerald Moreno and Lisa De Witt have taken to STALKING me around the Net, they would of course have seen my profile at GaudiyaDiscussions.Com...

...regularly updates his stalkblog by rehashing his malicious and distorted propaganda...

...trolling through the archives of this board and is busy collecting a record of all the posts I have made is his hateful crusade of stalking me...

Being as you stalk me...

...are back in their comedy double-act of harassing and stalking ex-devotees...

...she has now reduced herself to stalking me and the comments I've left on other blogs...

Anyway Lisa, why are you researching my blog comments and passing them along to Joe, so he can stalk me like the weird creep that he is and follow me everywhere?

Poor Gerald, utterly obsessed with me insofar as to become a raving loony, STALKING me everywhere...

What more can we expect from an admitted stalker (who's proud of that too)...

Good to see that Gerald is STILL obsessively stalking me with homo-erotic fervour.

And because of admitted stalkers like him, Guruphiliac went into comment moderation mode.

...joy with his arms in the air at being officially appointed a stalker. Not just any old stalker, mind you, but a PERSONAL stalker...

Now he is completely free to stalk me and obsess over every single detail of my life. Have fun, geek! :-)

...my favourite sexually-obsessed critic and online stalker...

This ridiculous person obsessively stalks me and comes up with "conclusions" on his website that are illogical, dubious and disingenuous.

I didn't have proof because I can't be bothered qto check ALL of his pages like the obsessive stalker he is.

He really should stick to writing fictitious stories about me and following me around the Internet stalking me.

Not to mention an obsessive and sick stalker. :-)

...is nothing but an insidious, abusive, obsessive stalking liar...

Not to mention obsessively STALKING ex-devotees everywhere and interfering in their online and private lives.

...for his obsessive and borderline-insane stalking behaviour...

Given that you're so good at stalking me...

He couldn't have made his presence more obvious, and his obsession with stalking me is beginning to manifest itself fully. :-)

...they seriously need to get a life and do something about their stalking and obsession...

...serves NO purpose except to feed his sick stalking obsession with anti-SB peeople...

What more evidence do we need of Moreno's sick stalking and obsession with anti-SBs?

...has shown by his dastardly conduct that he is a sneaky and obsessive online stalking troll...

Says the sleazy, slimy, muck-raking obsessive online stalker who thinks nothing about broadcasting private diary entries in public.

...he has proved himself to be a malignant online stalker...

HOW many times have I ALREADY said that this was a story to get you OFF my back, you stalker bitch? It didn't stop you stalking me anyway, psycho nutcase.

Reference For All Quotes Above

...Sai Baba groupies feel the need to stalk me since 1998 in failed bids to make me look bad... (Reference)

How pathetic these stalkers are that they try to go as far back as 1998 to stalk me, they are truly obsessed with me. :-) (Reference)

Strange enough, Sanjay claimed (twice) that Sai Devotees were "stalking" him going back to 1998, 3 years before he became an ex-devotee! Why were Sai Devotees "stalking" Sanjay and trying to make him "look bad" when he was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba? Apparently, devotees caught Sanjay engaging in some sort of questionable behavior and Sanjay let it slip out of the bag.

In Sanjay's looney-tune-world, he plays the role of a helpless and forlorn victim who hopes that He-Man, Batman or Elvis will save the day. In Sanjay's looney-tune-world, everyone else is after him, stalking him, watching him, defaming him, obsessing over him and fantasizing about him (talk about being on an ego-trip). In Sanjay's looney-tune-world, everyone else is wrong, stupid, mistaken, brainwashed and gullible.

The irony of it all is that Sanjay is a fully exposed stalker who went around stalking innocent teenagers, women, mothers and university students with his digicam, filming them up their dresses, under tables, at bus stands, on the subway, in bookstores, in restaurants and even at school and posted his lustful escapades on his StreetBitches Blog.

Sanjay is a nut who relentlessly stalks Sathya Sai Baba on the internet like a groupie or junkie addicted to cocaine. Sanjay tracks every single news article, blog and conversation pertaining to Baba that he can find. Since Sanjay often equates "stalking" between males as being indicative of "homoerotic fervour", one is left to question why Sanjay has such an unhealthy sexual obsession with Sathya Sai Baba (especially when Baba has never been convicted or charged with any crime)?

For those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, I think it is obvious why Sanjay has a sexually-focused stalking obsession with Sathya Sai Baba. The following links help clarify the situation immensely:

Dadlani's Homoeroticism:
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion
- Move Over He-Man - Here Comes He-Krsna!
- Pink Blog Theme
- Dream About Sanjay
- Pink Is In. Sanjay Isn't.
- Sanjay's Incestuous Homoeroticism
- Sanjay's Pink G-String

Sanjay's "Direct Experience" Of Sathya Sai Baba's Godhood

2006-11-20T10:06:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Here are some amusing, sappy and warm-and-fuzzy devotee-quotes from Sanjay when he was praising Sathya Sai Baba as God Incarnate. Sanjay said that his realization of Baba's divinity was based on direct experience and was not based on books or stories as told by others!

He helped me rediscover my own religion, as he himself teaches us to be a better person of our own religion. Be a better Hindu, be a better Muslim, etc.

I do accept Him as God. Why? Well it's really hard to explain. Anyone who receives information about his miracles, etc, will naturally be attracted, but I think the realisation that "He is God" comes through a totally personal and individual set of circumstances.

Many people believe that he is God for a variety of reasons. Even today many people regard him as no more than a "holy man."

My own realisation happened like this: I had heard various stories of his miracles, like stopping natural disasters, raising people from death, etc, and I soon realised that this person was indeed performing "God-like" miracles. But the question still remained in the back of my mind, 'WHO is he? Is he God? Or just a holy man with great powers?'

Soon enough, I received a magazine which contained the various prophecies predicting Sai's advent, and that did it for me. There was really no turning back. Since I have a scholarly background, I know that it is a fact that whenever Avatars appear, there MUST be prior indication in scriptures. Since Sai Baba was predicted in not only Hindu scriptures, but in the other scriptures of the world also, well, WOW! (Reference)

Yes I currently believe that Sai is God (much like the rest of the 80 million devotees!), and that "faith" is based on direct experience, not on the stories I hear from books, or ofrom other people. In fact, it may interest you to know that I am a bit of a "revolutionary" devotee, because I tend to disagree with most. (Reference)

Let us be clear on what type of devotee Sanjay was. Sanjay was one of those "brainwashed" devotees who mushed, gushed, shrieked, melted and swooned over Sri Sathya Sai Baba like a girly teenager. Need more proof? Just read my past article entitled "Swaaaami!!! La la la la laaaaa!!".

Does the weirdness ever end?

Sanjay's Christian Supporter

2006-11-19T07:03:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Shocking Defamations By "Barbara J . Dent-Walton": A Fanatic Christian, Self-Professed Channeler Of Mother Mary And Supporter Of Sanjay Kishore.

MENU (click on a link to go to relevant section):
Introduction To Barbara Dent
Mother Mary Gives Me A Message Through Barbara Dent
Mother Mary And Mother Earth Speak Through Barbara Dent
Mother Mary Bashes Gays And Lesbians Through Barbara Dent
Barbara Dent's Many Lives With Mother Mary
Enter Mother Mary, Jesus, Joseph And Princess Diana
Barbara's Near Insanity, Homelessness And Astral Rapes
Barbara Dent Can Hear Dead People Speak To Her
Barbara Claims She Has The Gift Of Telepathy And Can Astral Travel
Barbara Dent Knows The Cure For AIDS
Barbara Confuses Mother Mary And Joseph With Adam And Eve
Barbara J. Dent Had Sex With A Married Man: Blames Sai Baba
Spiffy Quotes Direct From Barbara Dent's Potty Mouth
In Conclusion

Introduction To Barbara Dent:
Return To Menu

Barbara Dent is an ex-devotee of Sri Sathya Sai Baba. She submitted a signature to the "saipetition.net" site in which she claimed to have been a devotee from 1987 - 2004 (a period of 17 years). Barbara Dent is one of many Anti-Sai Activists who wage a flaming, vulgar and defamatory smear campaign against Sathya Sai Baba on the internet. Barbara has taken her psychotic Anti-Sai crusade to two QuickTopic forums (where one can listen to her endlessly garble about Satan, Mother Mary, Sai Baba and her holy war). Barbara Dent uses several names such as:

Carolyn

Carolyn Dardee

Carolyn Feice

Barbara

Barbara Osler

Barbara Dent

Barbara Walton

Barbara Dent-Walton

Barbara J. Osler

Barbara J. Dent

Barbara J. Walton

Barbara J. Dent-Walton

Amen

Kickbaabaa's Ass

Mother Bear

She uses the email: iseejesu@yahoo.com. Barbara is a Christian whacko who now claims that she is an internet psychic and that the spirit of Mother Mary possesses her, speaks through her and types through her fingers! Strange enough, Mother Mary cusses up a storm, bashes gays and lesbians and speaks exactly like Barbara does. She was formerly married to John Walton who had a spirit guide named "Hinono" and he wrote a book that Barbara edited entitled "For the Land of the Lost: How to Get Ready for God: Fire, Earth, Water, Air".

Mother Mary Gives Me A Message Through Barbara Dent:
Return To Menu

Barbara relayed the following message to me from Mother Mary herself:

"When I said I channeled Mother Mary, I MEANT it!!! So does Carolyn, you wretched and rotted idiot!!! AND THE NEXT IS FROM MOTHER MARY HERSELF:

To Joe108: "And you, bloody bastard, you said of me, and I quote, 'I do not need channels to voice my message.' I don't need you, fool. For when I said I use these two to carry my word into the world, I wasn't kidding. That's the second lie you told. It will cost you even more of your mind, mindless one. I don't tolerate such injustices and filth like you. I never did. I only allow your mindless twitter to continue, so that others may also learn just what and who you truly are. You are not Divine. You are hated by God. You lied to the world again and again, saying these two girls are the same person. For this lurid attempt to destroy yet two more feminine children of mine, I shall shatter your mind in four more pieces for the four names of mockery you dared utter against these two innocent victims, who dared to write down my words exactly as I spoke them. Did you think I would not return to you what you sought to lay upon these two good girls, who I sent into the world to take out you and your filthy kind? Want to bet I don't talk like this? This crap you wrote and send out to the entire world about me will cost you dearly. I don't pussy-foot around. I intend to take out more than your lights, you dark one who dared call himself ME. I am not you, nor will I ever be. If you think I can't and don't and won't and will not continue to use people I love as guides and channels and voices I speak through, think again, little faggot queen. I don't use queers and assholes and demon whores and would-be studs, a.k.a. Sai fag queens, to ever bring my word to any people anywhere, not in any time or dimension or plane or "heaven" or fun house like earth. I hate your kind on my earth. You never belonged here. You seek to join your energies with anyone or anything. It doesn't matter. You know nothing. You never did. You are un-learned, like Sai. You can only copy life. You don't impress anyone. You thought to overpower me, and that was your fatal mistake. I don't take shit lying down. I throw up false "prophets" like you daily. Enjoying your "think tank" sessions with blank minds that also "think" like you? I enjoy laughing at your "serious wit", witless old Fool. I capitalized Fool, foolish one, because you think to "take Mother Mary out" by banging out some foolish, unfounded crap on some ancient keyboard? When did you ever write or type or chalk or pencil or voice or "sing" a heartfelt word of love or praise to any of my children about anything, EVER??? You never did. Not ever. Nor will you ever, for it is not within you to be kind. You have NO attributes of God. You seek your own demise, for it is the thing that "attracts" you the most… your death. It is the black hole you live in, the door into Hell you will never be able to walk out of. You can FEEL its Presence, the Holy Spirit, and yet you abhor it. It terrorizes you to be left out, so you try to be included everywhere. You would say you are a God devotee, but you are not. I know ALL of my own God Children, for they are identical to me. There is nothing of me that they cannot be, know or have. I have given all that I am to each of my children. They, like me, know who you are through and through. They laugh at God's opposite, because they have good, wise wit. I make it my play to toy with you for awhile. Of course they act like me. They have my Good Will inside. It makes them fun to be around."

Too funny. Mother Mary has a potty mouth and uses phrases like:

"bloody bastard"

"I don't pussyfoot around"

"faggot queen"

"Sai fag queen"

"queer"

"asshole"

"demon whores"

"I don't take shit lying down"

Call it coincidence, but Mother Mary sounds exactly like Barbara. Barbara obviously thinks she is fooling people into believing that Mother Mary speaks through her. A very unconvincing act, if you ask me.

Mother Mary And Mother Earth Speak Through Barbara Dent:
Return To Menu

Mother Mary (also known as "Mother Earth", didn't you know?) defended Barbara by resorting to verbal abuse:

"I am called Mother Mary and this woman who channels me just fine is called Barbara Dent and was severely beaten, raped, animals tortured by him and his filthy crew called Kumar and obviously you too...I am speaking to the demon traits in you,dear one, for you obviously are a part and parcel of this ancient crap called dirty Sai Baba devil filth. You know who you are as well as I. I say you are dirty, filthy Satan, and you came to my earth to rape and pillage and plunder all that was good. But look at you now. You are dead almost. Yeah. We have won our earth back from you and your kind, even the little snots like you who you try to get to defend your so-called good name, will,like you, be all dead shortly. That is why I send so many earthquakes, earthshakes, floods and torrential rains, and more, to wash and shake and blast you once and forever off my sacred bones and earth. This is Mother Earth that speaks to you as Mother Mary and more. Anyone sane knows this pig called Satchya Sai Baba is not God, but his original name was none other than devil Satan, and I don't mean maybe...See the mind of God or die. Open your third eye as this one typing has done. And when she did, she saw it was your dear Sai Baba raping her and none other. So don't open your fifth chakra, your big mouth and fib to yourself or any other about the "greatness" of evil Sai. You must be blind, deaf and dumb if you never witnessed this at your school or ashram. Millions of others did... AND THEY DO NOT LIE, you filthy little snot. Get off my earth, Kumar, you and all other like you as well, for when you support another of such filth, you must be equally filthy, stupid and mentally lazy and evil!!! Goodbye forever, you will not inhabit my earth for long."

Mother Mary aka Mother Earth claimed that she is responsible for "earthquakes, earthshakes, floods and torrential rains, and more, to wash and shake and blast you once and forever off my sacred bones and earth"! Barbara also claims that she opened her "third eye" and sees into the astral world.

Mother Mary Bashes Gays And Lesbians Through Barbara Dent:
Return To Menu

"Barbara, you keep right on writing these words we all know you bring from our True Mother and Father God. I join forces with you in helping you rid the earth of all filthy gays and queers and lesbians and rapists and whores, for underlying such filth is nothing but Satan rot. Take heart, my friends, I too feel they won't last long on Mother Earth. They all think they are special when Sai Baba sucks their dicks. Brainless wierdos."

Barbara Dent's Many Lives With Mother Mary:
Return To Menu

"I have incarnated with Mother Mary more times than you can begin to count. I know so many of my past lives through her kind guidance, it's humerous. Since when was Mother Mary not found on earth, taking out these ragged queers? You think she doesn't hate shit and evil, like that many times over split fool, who posts his crap under so many various names?"

Enter Mother Mary, Jesus, Joseph And Princess Diana:
Return To Menu

"I know you both like having it stuck up your backside. NOT ME. And I will take out every last drone, with the help of Mother Mary and Her very sacred crew... meaning you, dirty drag queens, killers of all that was good and sacred and true. It's over for you!!! That's why you are all losing your land, your money, your jobs... your dinner, etc...that's the Second Chakra the Holy Ones are taking out all over the earth. Look around you, ignorant fools.
The very blessed child of God called Ravindran actually said it best--you boys who never got a boy's form that could grow into a sane man (or woman) are pitiful little fruits. Without the sunlight of Truth and the God-given rain of sanity, you too will shrivel and dry and eek out your days in horror upon our blessed earth, like your dried up old prune Sai. Now figure this out... if you can. Who spoke these words? Was it I, Mother Mary, Jesus, Joseph or Princess Diana? Answer. All had a part in taking you out, little vile horrors, Ex-Sai student and dumb draby, poor boy Chandan who never got a diamond ring."

Barbara's Near Insanity, Homelessness And Astral Rapes:
Return To Menu

"I know more about him than most, as I too was a victim of "spiritual" rape, meaning, he came to me often over the period of 3 1/2 years, via the psychic plane, raping me at will...All I know is that I nearly died insane. I hated him bitterly. One day, Mother Mary came to be told me, showed me how to stop this horror that he insisted was good for my body. I hate him to this day, for subjugating me to such horror and evil and filth. I was a woman of some means, I mean money, and he took that too. After so much rape and emotional abuse, I became homeless for over two years. I lost eveything. My animals were raped on the psychic plane as well. Many lost their lives in the most vicious and cruel ways. My horse Wind Star was maliciously cut in so many places, I lost count. Several of my other cats were torn to pieces. They lost their minds as well. If this is not Satan, you tell me who it is. I will never forget the words of my mother Mary. She told me Sai Baba's original name was, in fact, Satan. and he has been changing names every since he first came to our planet. He was never invited here, he just came here with his many evil drones, sons, if you will. And they took everything from our earth. Some of these first idiots to come here were none other than folks like Napolean, Hitler, Stalin, Edi Amein, and on and on and on. When they first arrived here, however, they were known by their original demonic names, not by their latest incarnational names."

Barbara Dent Can Hear Dead People Speak To Her:
Return To Menu

"For what goes around comes around. He is dying slowly, so that others may see just exactly who he is and who he is not. Same with Avil Kumar, his first right hand man. who is also evil and an incestuous hog. Many others at his ashrams in charge know this man is a sadist, a murderer and a pediphile, yet they say nothing because they are the same. I know them well. A couple of my friends tell me he participated in their deaths, for I hear the dead speak. This is another reason he came to me so frequently... to shut me up. But I will never stop telling the world who he is, until he is dead and gone forever from this earth. One day he came to me on the psychic plane and said, "I will kill you for your words." That was the night my horse was butchered and nearly died."

Barbara Claims She Has The Gift Of Telepathy And Can Astral Travel:
Return To Menu

"We all hear your cries of foulness, the dirty and dishonest names you actually do call us... all under your breath, of course. And you think we can't hear you? Some of us actually have this thing called God's Gift to His own people. It's called the Gift of Mental Telepathy. It's call the Gift of Out-of-Body Travel. That's how we know Sai lies a lot, just like you. Even the Akashic Records tell everything about you... where you slumber and snore at night, who you slut around with... or rather who you tried to, but no longer can. You are all IMPOTENT queers, who can't get enough energy in your so-called penises to rape and sodomize any of us anymore. That's the only reason Joe isn't molesting or being "molested" any more. Don't think for a minute that he wouldn't, if he still could. How about that? Permanent IMPOTENCY for all you lifeless hogs and queers. I told you the Mother of All is rendering you all forever IMPOTENT!!! Without sexual fire, there is no fire to ignite the brain or any of the body's organs. Death comes slow and painfull to all you worthless sodomizing, raping whores."

Barbara Dent Knows The Cure For AIDS:
Return To Menu

"I want this innocent one called Hari haran to really know there is a cure for Aids. Start by cleansing the liver first of all. You can do that by drinking a lot of water with lemon. Then you boost the Immune System. It's not difficult to do, and it costs hardly any money at all… only a few lemons. Then you find folks like me who use massage and other good methods for removing sickness off an innocent form like yours. Then you send it back to the evil perpetrator , dirty slut Sai Baba… as well as really mean Chandan, who actually mocked your innocence. The nasty dirty unwanted little drone BASTARD!!! Meaning, he doesn't have a real mama or a real papa. No one wants that mean little freak. That's why he tries to hang out here with us. Unwanted fodder. Too ugly and mean and dirty and rude. Too stupid to get a life or a earn a living, poor sick and twisted, lonely, creepy, godawful, damaged, stinky-smelling fool."

Barbara Confuses Mother Mary And Joseph With Adam And Eve:
Return To Menu

"That favorite Mother is none other than Mother Mary. She has a husband called Joseph, and they were the First Couple to populate our Earth. Ask her sometime. See what you get... dirt ball."

Barbara J. Dent Had Sex With A Married Man: Blames Sai Baba:
Return To Menu

"I was given a test--a big test--one I found wanting never to take again. Through a strange set of circmstances, I was led by Sai Baba to believe that sleeping with my best friend's husband was an answer to solving their marital problems. I couldn't quite believe this, nevertheless, I thought Sai was a supreme guide. I made a weak attempt to comply. Confusion grew greater and greater. How could this be God telling me to do this? I had no doubt that the voice I heard was Sai Baba's."

Spiffy Quotes Direct From Barbara Dent's Potty Mouth:
Return To Menu

"You are absolutely correct in assessment of this most vile creature the world has even known. This man is not honest, nor is he good. He is a molester of men, women, children, even animals. He worships incest. Look at his statue of Saraswathi, seated in a lotus position, right at the bottom of the footseps of his darshan hall at Whitefield, Bangalore. Saraswathi is a product of incest, not rape... and this is the female diety he would have us respect, honor and worship, as well as him? Two birds of the same feather. Puke."

"The best part is, the rest of the world can see how stupidly nasty you truly are, just like your father, Satan Sai. You're just one more filthy, mentally defunct, creepy little drone, who acts and sounds just like your daddy, Satan Sai. On the psychic plane, of course."

"And why not include your REAL NAME, not just some mealy mouthed signature--'EX-Sai student'. Then others can know who you really are, hiding little snake. Takes guts, doesn't it, to put your name, right on the internet. You ain't got no testicles or penis, not even a womb nor a brain. For others who want a laugh, this one called Sai student has a penis size about one inch long, if that. And that's a fact!!"

"And for your information, filthy sai student, my letter clearly states that I CHANNEL Mother Mary. I never once said I was her. Are you crazy or just majorly retarded? Of course I am not her. Do you even know what a channel is, uneducated fool?"

"Wanna' guess who told me to tell you that, snotty little queer? Will your worthless "testimony" in favor of Sai, that of--I didn't see a thing or you're just a crazy bitch--actually get him off the electric chair? You think so, little demon snot and whore called Ex-sai student? You think I don't know exactly who you are and what you have done? Did you have a sister you liked to rape? Queer butt."

"One sure way to tell a nasty drone from a true Child of God is that they actually claim to be Mother Mary, God the Mother, etc. This is a very deep psychosis. What fractured mind would ever dare to make such a false claim? Only a mind possessed by the darkest evil—faggy-girl Satan Sai--who also "claims" to be our Mother. Duh!!! Don't you just want to puke when disgusting, woosie-toosie, whiney girlie Sai dons his disgusting glossy-white dresses and prissy-prances like a girl he ain't, saying he is our Mother God??? Where are his matching silk panties, his braziers and fancy laces? Where are his sleezy red high heels? His diamond rings for each lazy finger? His lipstick of pearly pink and his matching colors of rosey rouge? Where's his classy fox fur coat? (Probably buried with Marilyn drone-butt Monroe, another whore like Sai). For I know he always envied her. That's where he got his "moves." Ssb is as "transparent" as his coat of gay "armor". Meaning, it's easy to pierce though that faggot's defenses. That's what I do on this Internet, along with the real Mother Mary. We make sure Satan and Satan's evil creatures fry in hell for long past Eternity."

"Look at the grief on their repulsively ugly and revolting faces. Anyone seen Sai Baba's pale and bloodless, crazed look of terror frozen on his huge face lately? Meaning, he's starting to re-metamorphize back into his original head of horror, the Beast of all beasts, the one branded with its own true number, 666. In case anyone has forgotten, ssb's birth time occurred at 6:26, in the year 1926…. This boils down to the exact description and number of the Mark of the Beast, 666, also known to some as the Antichrist. There is an old Biblical prophecy, among many other prophecies, that predicted the Antichrist would appear on earth, during the last epoch of earth's history. Ssb is definitely the Antichrist, ie Satanist, ie, monster from hell that we have all come to tag and identify--not just Christians everywhere, but Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sufi's, etc, etc… billions are now praying his Satanic whoring filth off our lands everywhere. That's why he dying so rapidly. We are also taking much needed action. Hence, the true purpose for this website. I encourage you to keep writing and praying and doing everything in your power to annihilate this ancient evil and all of his remaining copy-cat drones forever."

"We don't NEED to tell them off. I just enjoy it, really enjoy it."

"Get the point, asshole freak? Get off our earth, vile demon whores!!!"

"You see, queer butt, we hate sick queers, demons and vile gross whores like you who like to lie for a living. Sick sadistic freaks like you always crave verbal beatings and more. So here's some more right back to you. We don't like you. Never did. We don't want your kind on our earth. You got that yet? We intend to keep helping Mother Earth clean her very Sacred Body of you, until you are all screaming in hell."

"TO HOG N' WHORE, Putrid pud-wished-he-could-get-screwed-more-up-the-backside, completely IMPOTENT Joe 108, how is it being IMPOTENT? Hi honey, it's me, Barbara the Barbarian. Yipee!! So very thrilled you remembered my glamorous style of ripping off your pee-sized nuts with just my bare hands and teeth. Good for you, sweet sultry n’ sedutive, could-ya’-be-a girl queen??? What’s your name now? Liza Teaser? Emmie Eunuch? Or just plain WHORE??...Hey Joey, blowey, gay-girl guy, animal inserter, bet you thought you'd seen the last of me. Me-oh-me-oh-my. Sorry, loveless "lady", I like twisting out what little remains of your very nasty dong, as well as your pedophilic mind. How is it being IMPOTENT, queer butt?...Kinda' like ya'll, bill-do-dildo brain. Dinky-donkey messy frivolous what-ya-ma-call -it, thing, ya' sure ya' wanna' look into the mirror and be so happy-dappy, little freaky-friday?"

"How is it being impotent, little pickininny nun? Are ya sceeered 'cuz your wanger's never yet been found… and never will? Whee, I bet ya'll wanted us girls to think you was a real bad ass, drivin' all the girls crazy with your Harley Davidson, eh??? Ya’ motorcycle red-hot momma-man. Vrooom, vrooom. Now I'm gettin' REAL scared. Did I hurt your faggy-ass feelings, poor drippy Aids girl? Gettin' just a small hint of a picture of your fun-filled future? Hey karma queen, did ya' really mean to go "down south" so often? Who ya' bendin' over for now in your favorite, ass-over-tea-cup position? Slimmy slut! How was it being nuttin"? Sorry button. You're just a bedazzeled, "jewels-envy" kinda' guy. Sorry you lost all that you always stole from off our own Mother Earth... FOREVER AND forever... and forever...... What's hell for, except for toastin' gay cutters and sadist porn queens like you, come again to Earth for the very final time? How ya' doing, tootsie-wootsie?"

"I Would be King, said banana’s baba, but I only made the silly-thilly drag queens lists of common whores. I could go on. I promise I will take out more of your edginess real soon, ok drag whore, suckass jo-jo bean?"

In Conclusion:
Return To Menu

What to say? Barbara is just one of many Anti-Sai clowns and nutters on the internet who are tying to "expose" Sathya Sai Baba. The more these vicious Anti-Sai Activists say, the less I have to defend. Anti-Sai Activists make the case for me that they are a mob of angry, vindictive and mentally disturbed people who rather resort to defamation, deceit and dishonesty than the truth.

Related Link:
Christian Movements Against Sathya Sai Baba & Hinduism

Return To Top Menu

Sanjay's Pink G-String

2006-11-16T11:08:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Attempting to keep up with the never-ending exposure of Sanjay's homoeroticism and gender confusion, I found this gem from Sanjay's former killuminati blog (Reference).

Those who are familiar with Blogger will know how one can choose a random question for one's profile. Sanjay was given the following question:

If you were a cannibal, what would you wear to dinner?

Sanjay responded:

Pink G-String!

Just the type of answer one would expect from a person with a long and amusing history of homoeroticism and gender confusion, but not the type of answer one would expect from someone who sees homosexuality as being inextricably entwined with the color pink!

"Pink G-String!" lol

I guess it could always have been worse, like Sanjay's response on his other blog under the name "Dark Knight". On that blog, Sanjay was given the following question:

The children are waiting! Please tell them the story about the bald frog with the wig.

Sanjay responded:

It died a horrible death by someone's shoe and it's limpid body was dragged and smeared all over the floor! :-)

I hope nobody is allowing Sanjay to be alone with children. I shudder at the thought.

Dadlani's Homoeroticism:
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism: A Closer Look
- Sanjay's Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion
- Move Over He-Man - Here Comes He-Krsna!
- Pink Blog Theme
- Dream About Sanjay
- Pink Is In. Sanjay Isn't.
- Sanjay's Incestuous Homoeroticism

Bow Or Bow-Wow?

2006-11-15T22:08:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

For those who may not know, Srila Prabhupada is the founder of the International Society For Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), also known as the Hare Krishna's.

On the Audarya-Fellowship forum, Sanjay made some amusing posts in which he clearly indicated that it was/is his custom to get down on his hands and knees and bow when entering and exiting the temple room. Sanjay worked himself into a self-righteous huff because others were "falling back on standards because of laziness" (clearly implying he suffered from no such laziness). Read for yourself:

It has been the custom since Srila Prabhupada's manifest presence to bow down when entering or leaving the temple room, even if one enters only for a minute.

However, I have noticed that this standard is starting to fall. Devotees now satisfy themselves with nodding their heads if not just touching the floor with their hands, with no thought if it pleases Srila Prabhupada or the Deities.

This can be understandable, since sometimes there is a need to place or remove heavy objects in the temple room, but that is not an excuse to fall back on standards simply because of laziness.

Just my opinion, and my regrets. (Ref: Post #8)

and...

No Priitaaji, you are not an oddball. Believe it or not, I have a very high respect and admiration for Srila Prabhupada's disciples such as yourself, and I am glad to read your posts all the time.

I understand what you mean about kirtana. I am not aware if people bow down or not according to their respect (or lack of it) but perhaps it may be due to a very crowded temple room. I'll have to admit that sometimes I have not been able to bow down during the prema-dhvani or other occasions simply because of a lack of room. In these cases I bow my head and hear the prema-dhvani, and hope Krsna will not be too offended at my not bowing down.

As long as Krsna knows that it is not convenient, lol!! But sometimes I feel a little guilty, especially when I have to remain in a standing position due to some specific service, etc. I agree with what you say about Srila Prabhupada; I have also read a letter from him in which he says pretty much what you say; that one must bow for everything. I remember him specifically saying "there is no limit to bowing down."

Something I forgot to mention earlier; in Bhagavad-gita, Krishna says that offering obeisances is an austerity of the body. So hey! Is this some easy tapasya or what! All one needs to do is bow down out of respect!

Priitaaji, could you tell me more about the custom of knocking on the temple-room doors before entering? How did it originate, what did Prabhupada say about it, etc? I'd be most grateful. (Ref: Post #20)

Sanjay needs to bow more and bow-wow less.

Unfortunately, the only type of bowing that Sanjay does nowadays is under tables to film women up their skirts and under tables with his digicam. Read About It For Yourself.

Pink Is In. Sanjay Isn't.

2006-11-11T18:39:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Click Here to view some posts where Sanjay spoke derisively about the Blogger pink-template used on this blog. Sanjay alleged that since I chose a pink-theme for my blog, this implies that I am a homosexual. Funny enough, Dinakaran (a nice guy and neutral party in the Sai Controversy, with whom Sanjay professes friendly relations) recently changed his blog color-theme to the very same pink-theme used on this blog!

Sanjay, what does this imply about Dinakaran? Do tell?

Furthermore, Sarlo (the Rajaneesh/Osho devotee who created the GuruRatings Yahoo Group) also has a very pink-theme that outdoes Blogger's pink-template anyday.

Sanjay, what does this imply about Sarlo? Do tell?

Sanjay Dadlani The Energizer Braggart

2006-11-11T14:20:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

As strange as it may sound, Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") is very sensitive to "lies". Since Sanjay is SO righteous and truthful, let me set the record straight about his pathetic and amusing lies that he was the one who discovered my real name and my personal geocities site before anyone else.

On the Quicktopic forum Sanjay said (Reference):

11-06-2006 09:43 PM ET (US)
"And before Moreno comes back with some asinine remark about how everyone knows his full (real) name, let me be the one to reveal that I was the first person to discover his identity online. Back in the early days when he had the 'vishvarupa' domain, he was still passing himself off as 'Joe' to all of us without divulging his identity. I did some digging around and I found his personal website on Geocities where his full name and details were there, and I passed this info along to everyone else. Get that, Handbag? I discovered your website before anybody else and I found out your real name too. It's no wonder you started using your full name immediately afterwards, lol."

The very first public mention to my webpages (dealing with the Sai Controversy) occurred on October 2nd 2004 when I wrote my first email to Robert Priddy: See For Yourself. A judgmental nut with the name "Randi Godager" emailed me the same day (October 2nd 2004) and requested my full name. I told Randi Godager that my full name was "Gerald Joe Moreno" and that my full name was clearly published on the bottom of my webpage: See For Yourself. Therefore, when I first created my webpages, I divulged my full name on the bottom of all of them. Sanjay is a filthy and pathetic braggart who lied when he said he was the one who "discovered my identity online". He most certainly did not. In 2004 (as well as to this day) I respond to all emails using the name "Joe". My full identity was divulged at the inception of my webpages dealing with the Sai Controversy and Sanjay had nothing to do with it.

Secondly, my geocities site does not divulge my "full name and details". So when Sanjay boasted that he found my "full name and details" on my geocities site, he is obviously in a drunken and confused stupor.

As a matter of fact, when I first communicated with Lisa DeWitt (a Sai Devotee), I didn't think of telling her about my geocities site but she found it anyway the day after we talked. My geocities site has never been hidden and no attempt was ever made to conceal it from anyone. Sanjay's finding my site is no great accomplishment as anyone with remedial google-searching skills can find it.

Sanjay also said:

"And while I'm on the subject, Gerald Moreno hid his picture which was on his personal website. What a flaming hypocrite this guy is, who makes fun of people's physical appearances and even creates false and hurtful pictures of them by playing around with Photoshop-type programs, is himself afraid of his picture that he had to take it down to hide himself from the world? Never mind, we have it. :-) We know what he looks like. Couldn't you have chosen a better hairstyle, Homoreno? :-)"

Click Here To View Some Pictures Of Sanjay Dadlani (the Hare Krishna Congregational Member who loves to stalk innocent teenagers and students with his digicam and secretly film them up their dresses and under tables: Reference). Sanjay, couldn't you have chosen a better hairstyle than your Papa Smurf one? :-)

Click Here To View The Merged Photoshop-Type Images In Question or Click Here For The Blogged Version

It is utterly absurd that Sanjay (of all people) called me a "flaming hypocrite" and whined and whimpered about me creating "hurtful pictures" of others by "playing around with photoshop-type programs".

First and foremost, I was not the one who started the warring over "merged photoshop-type images". Sanjay was responsible. On several blogged posts, Sanjay posted "merged photoshop-type images" of Sathya Sai Baba and thought it was funny. As a matter of fact, Reiner Van Der Sandt also created "merged photoshop-type images" of Sathya Sai Baba as well: Reference.

Needless to say, Sanjay never complained about these "hurtful" images and even said about them, "hope these give you a good belly laugh as they did me". However, when the tables were turned (and thankfully they were) and a Sai Devotee (using the pseudonym "PremaPerm") made "merged photoshop-type images" of Sanjay, he didn't like it and threw a flaming, shrieking, girly hissy-fit and shrilly blurted "Not to mention the fact that he has stolen an image of myself from my website and regularly presents ridiculous composite images such as the one you see. Such childish behaviour hardly deserves any comment.".

Although Sanjay was allegedly deeply offended by the "merged photoshop-type images" of himself, within a few weeks time he stole my composite image of him and Bala Sai Baba and started using it as his picture on his blog! See my article entitled Sanjay: Multiple Personalities?

Sanjay also said:

"When he refers to other people as being 'anonymous, faceless hypocrites', he is really talking about himself."

If Sanjay is so honest, he should come forward with his real full name, full address, full phone number and contact details. To date, Sanjay has never divulged this information, yet hypocritically points his pudgy fingers at me and whines and babbles about my "anonymous" identity.

Sanjay is a braggart, a flaming hypocrite and a shameless liar with proof. His lies never end. His absurdities never end and his suffocating negativity and bitterness never end. Sanjay is the energizer braggart who can't stop beating his own drum.

To Flip-Flop Or Not To Flip Flop?

2006-11-11T12:31:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Trying to slither his way out of his past comments about The Guardian Article being the result of a 6-month-long collaboration between Paul Lewis and Anti-Sai Activists, Sanjay said:

"Regarding my previous post, this is yet another like of Joeblow Moreno's. He is stupidly claiming that the recent Guardian article is the result of a six-month collaboration with anti-Sais when this is a total and absurd lie.

I even blogged about it: Moreno's Guardian Lies And Speculations. Even after it has been proven that my remarks of April referred to my posting just a few days later, the intellectually-dishonest lying swine is still claiming (without any proof whatsoever) that his speculations are correct."

Apparently, Sanjay now realizes his blunder about boasting about how Anti-Sai Activists were behind Paul Lewis' The Guardian Article and is attempting to do damage control.

Neverless, it is on record that Sanjay said exactly the following (with the included link):

Sai Baba EXPOSED!
11-05-2006 01:23 AM
Edited by author 11-05-2006 01:49 AM
"Want to talk about blindness? I warned you fools about this months ago, but you're way too thick to pick up the hints. I even warned you months in advance about the BBC movie, and you were too thick to pick up the hints about that too. Nothing has changed even two years later. :-)" (Reference)

If my comments about Anti-Sai Collaboration with Paul Lewis and The Guardian is a "total and absurd lie", then Sanjay is to blame. Not I. After all, Sanjay was the one who claimed that he "warned" us about The Guardian article and cited, as proof, his Yahoo post going back to April 2006.

Sanjay's Yahoo post said:

"Sai Baba, male-rapist extraordinaire, has been drooling for TWO YEARS expecting the entire UK Youth contingent to travel to Puttaparthi and satisfy his perverted sexual cravings. It's all going down this November. Details to follow." (Reference)

Call it coincidence, but come November (6 months later), Paul Lewis releases an article in The Guardian about (you guessed it) the UK Sai Youth Group traveling to Puttaparthi and "pedophilia claims".

Furthermore, in relation to Anti-Sai Collaboration with Paul Lewis and The Guardian, Sanjay also said:

"We already knew about this issue months before the date of publication of course. In fact it was mooted as a front-page story, but at the last minute a development in a legal issue involving PM Tony Blair took precedence and the Sai Baba article was moved to Page 3...Sorry I couldn't take part while I was busy participating in this development...We run the Exposé and the Exposé continues."

"And yes, I know all about what has gone on behind the scenes. This is the stuff I am working on while you idiots are arguing endlessly over who's a bigger pervert...Of course, I already know which page it's on even though I don't have it yet."

So now when Sanjay says that Anti-Sai Activists did not collaborate with Paul Lewis and were not involved in the publication of the The Guardian article, one can only wonder what kind of people Sanjay thinks he is fooling?

Either Sanjay lied about his past comments regarding Anti-Sai Collaboration, or he is lying now. Either way, Sanjay lied and is liar, with proof.

Nothing Sanjay says can be trusted as he casually changes his views based on whatever whim suits him at any given moment.Sanjay flip-flops so often, he is like a fish out of water just waiting to die.

BBC 'Secret Swami' Programme Bias

2006-11-07T14:22:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

After exposing Anti-Sai Activist's involvement with Paul Lewis' Guardian Article and Michelle Goldberg's Salon.com Article, I think it is appropriate to divulge the same Anti-Sai bias in the BBC "Secret Swami" production.

MENU (click on a link to go to relevant section):
Bill Aitken's Opinion About The "Secret Swami" Program
"Secret Swami" Discussed In The Asian Voice
Tanya Datta Talks To Dr Murli Manohar Joshi About Letter
Suppressing Anti-Guru Bias On The "Secret Swami" Documentary
An Open Admission Of Bias About The Secret Swami Video
Pertaining To 'Secret Swami' Witness, Mark Roche
Pertaining To 'Secret Swami' Witness, Alaya Rahm

Bill Aitken's Opinion About The "Secret Swami" Program:
Return To Menu

Not only has the BBC.co.uk repeatedly been accused of bias, Bill Aitken (an expert in comparative religion and a travel writer) said about their program against Sathya Sai Baba:

"The latest in these so called exposes is a BBC documentary whose agenda was so predetermined to denigrate Baba that it stooped to the unethical use of a spy camera. In a last farcical gesture, the producer hired some roadside entertainers to attempt to simulate Baba's chamatkar. The result is so ludicrous that it leaves the viewer wondering as to who is funding this bizarre display of hostile reporting. The BBC is ultimately governed by the Anglican establishment, and churches in the west are losing out financially to the appeal of the Sai Baba movement. As a commercial broadcaster, the BBC's opting for sleaze would have the dual advantage of discrediting a rival as well as getting good audience rating. The Church of England can have no objection to programmes that weaken perceived threats—like the papacy or Hindu holy men—to its (declining) influence in the world. Posing as a lion in Asia, the BBC is a mouse in Britain. It dare not criticise public icons like the Queen, who happens to be the supremo of the Anglican church." (Reference)

"Secret Swami" Discussed In The Asian Voice:
Return To Menu

In an interview with an Asian Voice correspondent, Mr Ashok Bhagani (a trustee of the Sai Organisation in the UK) said that he believed the allegations in the Secret Swami BBC documentary were completely factless and baseless and have never been proved. Mr Bhagani also stated that when devotees are selected by Baba for a private interview, there is always someone else present in the room, and this is especially the case when women and children meet him (Reference).

Navin Patel, a biochemistry student at the Sathya Sai Arts College in Bangalore during the 1970s, told Asian Voice that he visited Baba's ashram many times and studied at Baba's college long enough to know the allegations were untrue. Patel claimed the 'Secret Swami' BBC documentary was very misleading and was based on only two westerners who had their own monetary agendas. Patel expressed the opinion that western journalists were bashing Baba collectively (Reference).

Tanya Datta Talks To Dr Murli Manohar Joshi About Letter:
Return To Menu

In the "Secret Swami" documentary, Tanya Datta queried Dr Murli Manohar Joshi about an official letter (released to the general public in December 2001) signed by A.B. Vajpayee (the then Prime Minister of India), P.N. Bhagawati (Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India), Ranganath Mishra (Chair Person, National Human Rights Commissioner of India and Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India), Najma Heptulla (President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union; UNDP Distinguished Human Development Ambassador) and Shivraj V. Patil (Member of Parliament, India; Formerly of the Lok Sabda & Union Minister) in which they all called the allegations against the Indian guru Satya Sai Baba "wild, reckless and concocted allegations made by certain vested interests" and that they "unequivocally condemned" the allegations as "baseless and malicious" (Reference).

Suppressing Anti-Guru Bias On The "Secret Swami" Documentary:
Return To Menu

Interesting enough, Khushwant Singh (an Indian Journalist consulted in the Secret Swami programme) stated in the GuruBusters video that he holds Anti-Guru and Rationalist views. Mr Singh said, "What you cannot prove by your reason, we reject...I reject God...I can only be wishful and say I hope that rationalism will thrive in this country as it has in some others." For some mysterious reason, Mr Singh's Anti-Guru and Rationalist views were not divulged in the Secret Swami programme.

An Open Admission Of Bias About The "Secret Swami" Video:
Return To Menu

Within the past 5-6 months, Andries Krugers Dagneaux (former webmaster and current "Main Representative, Supervisor and Contact" for the largest Anti-Sai Site on the internet, hetnet.nl/~exbaba: Reference) made several very disturbing claims that Michelle Goldberg (from salon.com), the Danish Radio (which produced the Seduced documentary), Tanya Datta (correspondent for the BBC in the production of the Secret Swami programme) and the BBC itself accepted, promoted the views of and were sympathetic with Anti-Sai Activists: Reference! It is true that Tanya Datta wrote an article promoting the Secret Swami programme in exclusive association with Basava Premanand (an atheist and long term critic & skeptic of Sathya Sai Baba since 1968). Tanya Datta also worked in close association with Premanand prior to the making of the Secret Swami programme.

Pertaining To "Secret Swami" Witness, Mark Roche:
Return To Menu

Mark Roche claimed in the Secret Swami documentary that he was allegedly abused once in 1976 (when he was approximately 25 years old) and maintained his devotion as a devotee to 1994 (for a period of 15 years). Strangely enough, Roche spent several weeks with Robert Priddy in 1994 and never gave any indication that he was upset with Baba or that anything was wrong. Mark Roche's testimony came from "out of the blue" and he has neither filed a basic police complaint, court case or even a written testimony about his alleged experiences with Sathya Sai Baba (Reference).

Pertaining To "Secret Swami" Witness, Alaya Rahm:
Return To Menu

According to Alexandra Nagel (in her paper "Shiva Shaki"), Alaya Rahm (the prime interviewee on the Secret Swami) claimed that "on two different occasions" Sathya Sai Baba turned his penis into a vagina or made his penis disappear and then reappear. Nagel said that she personally talked to Alaya Rahm (then using the pseudonym "Sam Young") and she obtained this first-hand testimony from him. Needless to say, nowhere else do we read this incredible (and simply unbelievable) claim from Alaya about Baba making his penis disappear and then reappear. Why not?

The testimonies of Alaya Rahm are sanitized versions of what Alaya actually encountered with Baba. In Alaya's testimonies, Sathya Sai Baba is depicted as a human, with no paranormal powers, who is forcing Alaya into having sex with him. However, factor in the accounts that Alaya Rahm gave to Alexandra Nagel where Baba literally went from having male genitals to female genitals and things begin to appear quite different. Of course, by adding the information that Alaya gave to Nagel, many would doubt Alaya's testimonies. Perhaps that's why it was never mentioned. However, factoring in the miraculous genitalia change, if it were true (and why would Alaya lie about it?), one could most certainly reason that since Baba has the miraculous ability to literally change from one gender to another, his actions, no matter how sexual, cannot be equated with those of a normal human being. This is not making an excuse for what happened to Alaya. It is simply a very valid observation based on the miraculous, physical transformation that Alaya attributed to SSB, but did not discuss in his public testimonies. Some have attributed this "genitalia switch" to Baba being a hermaphrodite. However, if we are to truly believe the accounts made by Alaya, Sathya Sai Baba had a fully functional penis as Alaya claimed he saw it.

As a matter of fact, Keith Ord gave a very compelling sexual encounter with Sathya Sai Baba that Anti-Sai Sites refuse to list in their sexual abuse section. Why? Because Keith Ord talked about Sathya Sai Baba literally morphing his penis into a vagina! Keith Ord specifically said that Baba was not a hermaphrodite, but that Baba literally changed his penis into a vagina. Of course, this claim makes Keith Ord's alleged sexual encounter with Baba sound crazy, which is why it is not listed under ExBaba's sexual abuse section. Furthermore, David Bailey accepted Keith Ord's story, but snipped out the "penis turned vagina" section because Bailey knew it would cast serious doubt on Keith Ord's credibility. If Keith Ord's testimony is seen as being unbelievable (because of the "genital switch" story), why is Alaya Rahm's not seen as being the same?

Consequently, we are presented with the possiblities that either Alaya Rham lied about his experiences or Sathya Sai Baba has the miraculous ability to change his gender at will. Which scenario sounds more plausible?

Secret Swami Related Links:
- Alaya Rahm's Self-Dissmissed Lawsuit
- A Scathing Response To Critics
- Alaya Rahm's Contradictory Testimonies

Return To Top Menu

RELATED BLOG LINKS: ANTI-SAI BIAS:
» » Michelle Goldberg Salon.com Bias
» » Paul Lewis, The Guardian & The Anti-Sai Hack Job

Michelle Goldberg Salon.com Bias

2006-11-07T14:00:00.000-08:00

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

After exposing Sanjay Dadlani and Anti-Sai Activist's involvement with Paul Lewis' Guardian Article, I think it is appropriate to divulge the same Anti-Sai Involvement in Michelle Goldberg's salon.com article entitled "Untouchable?".

MENU (click on a link to go to relevant section):
Introduction To Goldberg, Michelle And Her Salon.com Article
Email Correspondence Between Michelle Goldberg And Glen Meloy
Michelle Goldberg's First-Hand Interviews
Goldberg's Shabby Research And Exaggerated Claims
Failure To Verify Hari Sampath's Claims
Michelle Goldberg Contacts Anti-Sai Activists Again
In Conclusion

Introduction To Goldberg, Michelle And Her Salon.com Article:
Return To Menu

On July 25th 2001, Michelle Goldberg published a Salon.com (an internet news resource) article about Sathya Sai Baba entitled "Untouchable?". This article had a comments section entitled "Sai Baba: Pedophile or God incarnate?".

After reading the "Untouchable?" article, it was clear to me that it was thoroughly slanted against Satya Sai Baba. After doing some research, I found a startling set of email correspondence between Glen Meloy (an Anti-Sai Activist) and Michelle Goldberg that "filled in the gaps", so to speak. Not only did Michelle Goldberg say to Meloy, "Thanks again for all your help", she also said she hoped her article would "bring much attention to your struggle". Glen Meloy reciprocated and told Goldberg that it was "a privilege to work with you" (meaning they were working together, compiling information against Sathya Sai Baba).

Email Correspondence Between Michelle Goldberg And Glen Meloy:
Return To Menu

Email correspondence between Michelle Goldberg and Glen Meloy (an Anti-Sai Activist) divulged on the "hetnet.nl/~exbaba" site (the largest Anti-Sai Site on the world-wide-web):

Glen Meloy:
Dear Former Devotees, Devotees, Friends and Supporters of Truth and Goodness, I am pleased to share with all of you that we have finally had a major breakthrough today in the USA, wherein salon.com has now published a major cover story on Sai baba entitled...Untouchable? Sai Baba, perhaps the most powerful holy man in India, is also an alleged pedophile. By Michelle Goldberg

You can view it online and print it out from:
salon.com/people/feature/2001/07/25/baba/index.html

When you have finished reading the story, please write a short thank you note to Michelle and the Editors. You can do this at the end of the story in the section entitled: Sound Off - Send us a Letter to the Editor

You can also send a personal note of thanks directly to Michelle (See her letter below).

For Love, Truth and Goodness,

Glen

Michelle Goldberg:
michellehelene@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: yesontruth@earthlink.net
Subject: salon story

Dear Mr. Meloy,

I'm writing to let you know that my piece on Sai Baba will run as a Salon cover story tomorrow (Wednesday). I apologize for not having the time to pursue every angle of the story, but I think the final piece (more than 2000 words longer than it was originally assigned) will bring much attention to your struggle.

Thanks again for all your help.

Sincerely,

Michelle

Glen Meloy:
yesontruth@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:33:29 -0700
To: Michelle Goldberg michellehelene@yahoo.com
Subject: Salon.com Cover Story entitled "Untouchable"?

Dear Michelle,

All former devotees and supporters of Truth and Goodness appreciate your shining the spotlight of Truth on the dark side of Sathya Sai Baba who calls himself God .

Hopefully your story will open the eyes and touch the hearts of the American people and that it will be syndicated throughout the world media until this evil molester of children is brought to justice; and that his organization is exposed and held accountable for covering up these heinous acts for over 40 years.

We thank you for your excellent writing and may it soon be proved that he is indeed... NOT Untouchable.

It has been a privilege to work with you and I hope the editors of Salon.com will consider allowing you to do a follow-up story on all the other leads and material that has been furnished to you.

Our Heartfelt Thanks from all of us,

Glen Meloy

Michelle Goldberg's First-Hand Interviews:
Return To Menu

In the "Untouchable?" article, Michelle Goldberg only interviewed the following Sai Critics first-hand:

Glen Meloy (an Anti-Sai Activist)

Hari Sampath (an Anti-Sai Activist)

In the "Untouchable?" article, Michelle Goldberg only interviewed the following alleged sexual abuse victims first-hand:

Jed Geyerhahn (an alleged molestation victim)

Said Afshin Khorramshahgol (an alleged molestation victim)

In the "Untouchable?" article, Michelle Goldberg only interviewed the following Sai Devotees first-hand:

An unnamed female Sai Devotee from Denmark. No mention is made of her expressing any opinion about the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba.

An unnamed female Sai Devotee from Buenos Aires. No mention is made of her expressing any opinion about the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba.

An unnamed female Sai Devotee from Holland. No mention is made of her expressing any opinion about the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba.

A male Sai Devotee named "George Leland". Leland expressed the opinion that the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba were true (although he also expressed the opinion that Baba was "the most powerful being that ever came to the planet").

A male Sai Devotee named "Rico Mario Haus". Haus expressed the opinion that the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba were completely false.

An unnamed Indian "director of the Sai Organization". He expressed the opinion that the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba were completely false.

Goldberg's Shabby Research And Exaggerated Claims:
Return To Menu

Goldberg's Claims:

"But the guru's alleged interest in his followers' phalli is pretty much an open secret among old hands at the ashram. The eerie thing about this story isn't just the evidence of widespread sexual abuse..."

"What's also strange is that many of Sai's followers seem to accept that their chastity-preaching guru takes young men, including minors, into a private chamber, asks them to drop their pants, masturbates them and occasionally demands blow jobs. They believe the stories, and they believe that he's God."

When there was only one Sai Devotee (out of the 6) who expressed the opinion that the allegations were probably true, where did Goldberg get her information from that convinced her to make the claims she did? She only spoke to one Sai Devotee who believed the allegations. This hardly makes the case for her claims of "evidence of widespread sexual abuse" and "many of Sai's followers seem to accept...". This amounts to nothing less than bold-faced distortions and blatant exaggerations of the truth by Michelle Goldberg.

Despite only interviewing two alleged victims (both of whom stated that they initially saw nothing sexual in what Sathya Sai Baba did to them) and making references to stories she read, but never verified first-hand, Goldberg had the audacity to state that there was "evidence of widespread sexual abuse". Goldberg also referred to the allegations of Hans De Kraker, Conny Larsson, David Bailey and Tal Brooke to form her speculations (although she never interviewed these alleged victims first-hand).

Failure To Verify Hari Sampath's Claims:
Return To Menu

In the Salon.com article, Goldberg reported that Hari Sampath was "petitioning India's Supreme Court to order the central government to investigate Sai Baba". In the following email correspondence, Goldberg acknowledged that she never verified Hari Sampath's claim that he was petitioning the Supreme Court. As a matter of fact, Hari Sampath publicly claimed that he petitioned (past tense) the Supreme Court on May 8th 2001, yet told Goldberg he was "petitioning" (present tense) the Supreme Court in July 2001. More contradictions from Hari Sampath and more failures from Goldberg to double-check claims.

Lisa De Witt:
Dear Ms. Goldberg,

Regarding Hari Sampath and the Sathya Sai Baba issue, can you please tell me if Hari ever actually showed you concrete proof he had filed a case with the Supreme Court of India? According to your July 25, 2001 article, Untouchable?, he had a case pending with the Supreme Court in India.

Yet, according to posts Hari made on the Anthony Thomas quicktopic board, the Supreme Court had, as of a decision on May 8, 2001, referred him to the High Court of India under article 37. I have checked the Supreme Court online records for May 8, 2001 and can find no such case decision.

Respectfully,

Lisa De Witt

Michelle Goldberg:
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:41:35 -0800 (PST)
From: "michelle goldberg"
Subject: Re: Hari Sampath
To: "Lisa De Witt"

Dear Lisa,

I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner -- I rarely check this email address. Hari never showed me any documentation -- I was in India at the time I wrote that story, and he was in Chicago, if I remember correctly. I relied on his word and the confirmation of a journalist who was working on the same story for one of the major Indian weeklies. Honestly, though, all this was four years ago, and I don't remember all the details.

Sorry I couldn't be more helpful.

Best,
Michelle

Michelle Goldberg Contacts Anti-Sai Activists Again:
Return To Menu

On the snowcrest.net site, Goldberg contacted Anti-Sai Activists again:

Michelle Goldberg:
www.snowcrest.net/sunrise/Q603-678.htm

07-12-2001 09:27 AM

Hello,

I'm an American journalist working on an article about Sai Baba for Salon Magazine. I recently spent a week in Puttaparthi talking to Sai devotees, and am now eager to get the other side of the story. I especially need to speak with people who have been victims of sexual abuse by Sai Baba; I've heard countless stories second-hand but need first-hand sources if I'm to publicize these charges. As I'm currently in India, the best way to get in touch with me is via email at michellehelene@yahoo.com. Thank you,

Michelle Goldberg

In Conclusion:
Return To Menu

There is little doubt that Michelle Goldberg worked with Anti-Sai Activists and purposely slanted her article in their favor. Needless to say, this hidden bias was never publicly divulged in her article.

Michelle Goldberg spent one week in India interviewing 6 Sai Devotees (only asking 3 about the allegations) and obtained a single admission from one non-notable Sai Devotee who expressed the opinion that he believed the allegations were probably true. After getting this single admission, Goldberg claimed that there was "evidence of widespread sexual abuse" and that "Sai's followers seem to accept that their chastity-preaching guru takes young men, including minors, into a private chamber, asks them to drop their pants, masturbates them and occasionally demands blow jobs". These stunning and unsubstantiated comments wholly compromise Goldberg's integrity.

After returning from her one-week jaunt at Baba's ashram, Goldberg wrote to
Anti-Sai Activists saying she was "eager to get the other side of the story". Hold on! Is asking 3 non-notable Sai Devotees their opinions about the allegations one side of the story?

Undoubtedly, Michelle Goldberg heavily relied on the words and views of Anti-Sai Activists. This was confirmed in her private email correspondence with Glen Meloy in which she said "Thanks again for all your help" and that she hoped her article would "bring much attention to your struggle". Glen Meloy reciprocated and said "it has been a privilege to work with you".

It is exactly this type of hidden bias and shabby research that is responsible for misleading so many people about Sai Baba. Anti-Sai Activists love to boast about how they were the one's responsible for negative media against Sathya Sai Baba (just like Sanjay Dadlani boasted about his involvement with Paul Lewis' Guardian Article). Critics love to make these same boasts in relation to Goldberg's Salon.com article as well. Therefore, the general public must be fully informed about the Anti-Sai "behind-the-scenes" influence that is responsible for negative media against Sathya Sai Baba.

Return To Top Menu

RELATED BLOG LINKS: ANTI-SAI BIAS:
» » Paul Lewis, The Guardian & The Anti-Sai Hack Job
» » BBC 'Secret Swami' Programme Bias